AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and the Intel Core i5-110. The AMD part delivers an average benchmark score of 52,901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-110, by contrast, sits in the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning its average score is listed as zero. This makes direct comparison impossible via head-to-head tests, but the existing data points for the AMD side are extensive.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 posts a PassMark single-thread score of 4,029, a figure that reflects strong per-core efficiency. Its multithread score reaches 25,889, which is a substantial result for a mobile-class processor. In integer math, the AMD chip scores 87,940, while floating-point math hits 55,799. Data compression workloads yield a score of 327,891, and data encryption comes in at 16,055. Extended instruction testing produces 24,193, and random string sorting finishes at 34,801. Prime number finding is a weaker area, with a score of 71, which is typical for workloads that rely heavily on single-thread latency rather than raw throughput.

The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This is not a statement of performance capability, but rather a gap in the recorded data. The database shows the AMD part with a full suite of PassMark results, while the Intel part has none. Therefore, any quantitative comparison must rely solely on the AMD side's figures and the architectural specifications of both chips.

When looking at the AMD part's nearest rivals, the data shows it is extremely close to the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, with a delta of 0.1% (the P164 scores 52,901 versus 52,873). It trails the Intel Xeon 634 by 0.1% (52,901 versus 52,974), the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.6% (52,901 versus 53,206), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.7% (52,901 versus 53,288). These deltas are small, indicating that the P164 performs within a narrow band of these established desktop and server parts, despite being a mobile-segment chip.

The Intel Core i5-110, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, would logically fall behind an 8-core, 16-thread part in heavily threaded workloads. But without recorded scores, the database cannot quantify that gap. The data that does exist shows the AMD part delivering a multithread score of 25,889, which is roughly 6.4 times its single-thread score of 4,029, a ratio that indicates strong scaling across its 16 threads.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 52,901 for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-110 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-110, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon 634, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 7313P, and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 memory only.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-110's boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process node from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, which is a 14 nm design fabricated by Intel. These process differences are significant: the smaller node allows for more transistors in a given area, though transistor counts are not listed in the database.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip's larger per-core L2 cache is a notable advantage for workloads that benefit from fast local data access. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB) could help in scenarios where multiple cores share data.

Memory architecture also diverges. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4, with memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics are another point of separation. The AMD part uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 630. The database does not provide comparative graphics benchmarks, so any performance claims about these iGPUs would be speculative.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every listed specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 2.90 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for the AMD part and 4.30 GHz for the Intel part. Thermal design power is 28 W for the AMD part and 65 W for the Intel part.

Sockets differ: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part is classified as a mobile-segment processor, while the Intel part is a desktop-segment processor. Production status is listed as active for both. The release date for the AMD part is recorded as March 8, 2026, while the Intel part has a release date of September 10, 2025.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $200. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a part number of SA35X, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

Process nodes differ: 4 nm for the AMD part, 14 nm for the Intel part. Foundries differ: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. The AMD part has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel part has no die size recorded. L1 cache is 80 KB per core for AMD and 64 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 256 KB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, DDR4 for Intel. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s for AMD, 42.7 GB/s for Intel. ECC support: true for AMD, false for Intel. PCIe: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 3 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon 880M for AMD, UHD Graphics 630 for Intel.

The Verdict

The data in the database points to a clear division of roles. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is a mobile-segment processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP. It delivers a single-thread score of 4,029 and a multithread score of 25,889, with an average benchmark score of 52,901. It sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs and is within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, a high-end desktop part.

The Intel Core i5-110 is a desktop-segment processor with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP. It has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its average score is zero. Its percentile ranking is 50th, which is the median point of the database, but this ranking is based on the absence of data rather than measured performance.

For workloads that benefit from higher core counts, faster memory bandwidth, and a more advanced process node, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has the documented advantage. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than double the Intel part's 42.7 GB/s, and its 4 nm node versus 14 nm suggests greater power efficiency per operation, though the database does not provide direct efficiency metrics.

For desktop builds that rely on the Intel Socket 1200 platform and DDR4 memory, the Intel Core i5-110 is the only compatible option in this comparison. Its 12 MB of shared L3 cache is larger than the AMD part's 8 MB, which could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads. The Intel part also has a recorded launch MSRP of $200, a detail not available for the AMD part.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results, and the Intel part has no scores at all. Buyers who need quantified performance data should rely on the AMD part's verified results. Those who require a desktop socket, DDR4 support, or a specific platform compatibility may select the Intel part, but they would be choosing it without any recorded performance validation in this database.