AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains comprehensive benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in this dataset. This asymmetry means the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's performance metrics and the Intel processor's architectural specifications to draw comparisons.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 posts an average benchmark score of 52,901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F (average score 52,873, a 0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon 634 (average score 52,974, a -0.1% delta), the AMD EPYC 7313P (average score 53,206, a -0.6% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (average score 53,288, a -0.7% delta). This positions the P164 in a tightly contested cluster where less than 1% separates the four surrounding processors.

In single-threaded work, the P164 scores 4,029 in the PassMark single-thread test. This figure indicates strong per-core performance for a processor with an 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz contributes to this result, and the data shows the processor can sustain high frequency on individual cores when needed.

The multi-threaded PassMark score for the P164 is 25,889. This represents the aggregate throughput across all 16 threads. The data shows a substantial scaling from single-thread performance, though the exact scaling factor depends on workload characteristics. The processor also achieves 87,940 in integer math, 55,799 in floating-point math, and 24,193 in extended instructions, demonstrating balanced arithmetic capability across different instruction types.

Memory-intensive workloads reveal further strengths. The P164 scores 327,891 in data compression and 34,801 in random string sorting. These results indicate efficient cache and memory subsystem utilization. The processor's 8 MB of L3 cache, combined with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X support, provides the data throughput necessary for these tasks.

Encryption tasks produce a score of 16,055, while prime number finding scores 71. Physics simulation scores 1,210. These varied results paint a picture of a processor that excels in data movement and arithmetic-heavy workloads, with more modest results in specialized mathematical operations.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50th places it at the median of all CPUs, but this ranking appears to be a default value given the absence of measured performance data. The available information shows a 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 45 watts, higher than the AMD's 28 watts.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 for performance-sensitive applications. With an average benchmark score of 52,901 and a 91st percentile ranking, the P164 sits in the upper tier of all tracked CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14501TE, lacking any recorded benchmark scores, cannot be directly compared on measured performance.

For workloads that benefit from higher thread counts, the P164's 8 cores and 16 threads provide an advantage over the i5-14501TE's 6 cores and 12 threads. The P164 also delivers higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus the Intel part's unspecified bandwidth, and it uses DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory compared to the Intel's DDR4 or DDR5 support.

The Intel processor does hold advantages in specific areas. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the AMD's 5.00 GHz, and its L3 cache of 24 MB shared is three times larger than the AMD's 8 MB. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

The data indicates the P164 is the stronger choice for multi-threaded productivity, data compression, and encryption workloads. The i5-14501TE may appeal to users prioritizing PCIe Gen 5 connectivity or larger shared cache, but without benchmark data, its actual performance advantage cannot be quantified.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile market segment.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop market segment.

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the AMD has 1 MB per core, while the Intel has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows the largest divergence, with the AMD providing 8 MB total and the Intel providing 24 MB shared.

Memory support also differs. The AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory. The Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with no bandwidth figure recorded, and it also supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity favors Intel. The AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel part a generational advantage in available I/O bandwidth for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The release dates show the Intel processor launched earlier, on 2024-06-30, while the AMD processor's release date is 2026-03-08. Both processors are currently marked as active in production.

The TDP figures show the AMD at 28 watts and the Intel at 45 watts. Both processors have locked multipliers, preventing overclocking. The AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz versus the Intel's 2.20 GHz, and the boost clocks are 5.00 GHz versus 5.10 GHz respectively.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has an average benchmark score of 52,901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor offers more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is three times larger than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164's 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What PCIe generations do the processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins in multi-threaded throughput scenarios. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide more parallel execution capacity than the Intel's 6 cores and 12 threads. The recorded multi-thread score of 25,889, combined with the 91st percentile ranking, demonstrates strong aggregate performance for workloads that scale across cores.

The AMD also wins in data-intensive operations. The data compression score of 327,891 and random string sorting score of 34,801 indicate a capable memory subsystem backed by 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X support provides the throughput needed for these tasks.

Encryption and security workloads favor the AMD as well. The data encryption score of 16,055 shows competent cryptographic throughput, and the extended instructions score of 24,193 indicates support for advanced instruction sets that accelerate these operations.

The AMD's power efficiency profile also favors it in constrained environments. With a 28-watt TDP versus the Intel's 45 watts, the AMD delivers its performance at a lower power envelope, which matters for mobile or thermally limited systems.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in single-core frequency potential. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the AMD's 5.00 GHz, suggesting that lightly threaded workloads may see a marginal advantage on the Intel part, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Intel also wins in cache capacity. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus the AMD's 8 MB provides a larger working set for frequently accessed data, potentially benefiting workloads with strong data locality.

PCIe Gen 5 support gives the Intel an advantage in I/O bandwidth for compatible peripherals. Storage devices, GPUs, or networking cards that leverage Gen 5 speeds can achieve higher transfer rates on the Intel platform.

The Intel's support for DDR4 memory provides a broader memory compatibility range. Systems with existing DDR4 modules can use them with the Intel processor, while the AMD requires DDR5 or LPDDR5X.

The release timeline also differs. The Intel processor has been available since 2024-06-30, while the AMD processor's release date is 2026-03-08. The Intel's earlier availability may matter for systems that need to be deployed sooner.

For users building new systems with PCIe Gen 5 devices, the Intel Core i5-14501TE presents a clear connectivity advantage. For users prioritizing multi-threaded performance, memory bandwidth, and power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 delivers according to the recorded data.