AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a shared L3 cache of 96 MB, compared to the Ryzen 3 110's shared 8 MB L3 cache.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 boosts up to 4.30 GHz, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D boosts up to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 memory, but the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a higher memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Which socket does each processor use?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses AMD Socket AM5.

Q: What is the production status and market segment of each?

A: Both are listed as Active in production. The Ryzen 3 110 is a Mobile segment part, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a Desktop segment part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. This generational gap shows in the manufacturing process: the Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. The die sizes reflect a major difference: the Ryzen 3 110 has a 210 mm² die, whereas the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a much smaller 71 mm² die, with the latter listing 11,270 million transistors.

Cache hierarchy differs substantially. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core, but the L2 cache per core doubles from 512 KB on the Ryzen 3 110 to 1 MB on the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The L3 cache is the most dramatic gap: the Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB shared, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 96 MB shared. This 12x difference in L3 capacity is the defining architectural feature of the 7500X3D, typical of the X3D line designed to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ: the Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D includes a generic Radeon Graphics. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel DDR5, but the memory bandwidth numbers differ: 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110 versus 83.2 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. PCIe support varies as well: the Ryzen 3 110 is limited to Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile part on Socket FP7, released on September 30, 2025, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a desktop part on Socket AM5, released on November 11, 2025. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a distinguishing factor. The Ryzen 3 110 has a 28 W TDP, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a 65 W TDP, reflecting its higher core count and clock speeds.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data in the database only records results for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D, with no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Ryzen 3 110. As a result, the comparison relies on the available recorded scores for the 7500X3D and the percentile ranking for the Ryzen 3 110.

The Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D ranks at the 89th percentile. This percentile gap indicates a large performance separation. The 7500X3D's average benchmark score is 44,573, while the Ryzen 3 110 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no recorded score exists for it.

Looking at the 7500X3D's raw scores, the single-thread score is 3,494, and the multithread score is 25,047. In floating-point math, it scores 43,594, and in integer math it scores 70,774. Data compression reaches 271,649, data encryption scores 15,797, and extended instructions score 20,455. Physics processing scores 2,779, random string sorting scores 32,999, and finding prime numbers scores 221.

The nearest rivals to the 7500X3D provide context for its performance level. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. It trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7%. These deltas are all within roughly 1%, placing the 7500X3D in a tightly clustered performance tier.

Since the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmarks, the database shows zero wins for it and zero wins for the 7500X3D in head-to-head results. The practical interpretation is that the 7500X3D's recorded scores, combined with its 89th percentile position, indicate a significantly higher performance level than the Ryzen 3 110's 50th percentile, which reflects no measured data rather than a measured low score.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

• Cores: 4 (Ryzen 3 110) vs 6 (Ryzen 5 7500X3D)
• Threads: 8 vs 12
• Base clock: 3.00 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
• Boost clock: 4.30 GHz vs 4.50 GHz
• TDP: 28 W vs 65 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 vs AMD Socket AM5
• Architecture: Zen 3+ vs Zen 4 (Raphael)
• Codename: Rembrandt-R vs Raphael
• Generation: Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) vs Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Raphael))
• Process node: 6 nm vs 5 nm
• Transistors: Not listed vs 11,270 million
• Die size: 210 mm² vs 71 mm²
• L2 cache: 512 KB per core vs 1 MB per core
• L3 cache: 8 MB shared vs 96 MB shared
• Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s vs 83.2 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes vs Gen 5, 24 Lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M vs Radeon Graphics
• Market segment: Mobile vs Desktop
• Release date: September 30, 2025 vs November 11, 2025
• Part number: 100-000000549 (FP7r2) vs 100-000001904
• Launch MSRP: Not listed vs $269 (stated once as launch MSRP)

Fields that are the same: manufacturer (AMD), L1 cache (64 KB per core), memory support (DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC memory support (both true), production status (Active), and multiplier unlocked (both false).

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins on every measurable performance metric available in the database. Its higher core count, higher clocks, larger caches, and newer architecture give it a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its multithread score of 25,047 and its 89th percentile ranking. The 96 MB L3 cache is particularly suited to workloads that repeatedly access a large working set, such as certain simulation and data-processing tasks. The single-thread score of 3,494, combined with a 4.50 GHz boost clock, supports strong performance in lightly threaded applications.

The Ryzen 3 110, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot claim any measured win. Its 50th percentile position reflects an absence of data, not a competitive score. Its strengths lie outside raw performance: it draws only 28 W, making it a low-power option for mobile systems, and it uses a smaller 8 MB L3 cache, which is less demanding on power. The mobile segment designation and Socket FP7 indicate it is intended for laptops, where the lower TDP and integrated Radeon 660M graphics are practical advantages.

For desktop users, the 7500X3D offers a 6-core, 12-thread design with a 65 W TDP, which is still relatively modest for a desktop part, and it includes PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes, which benefits high-bandwidth storage and GPUs. The Ryzen 3 110's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes is adequate for many mobile configurations but falls short of the newer standard. The 7500X3D also has a higher memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which supports memory-intensive applications.

The Verdict

The data indicates a decisive performance gap. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores, and those scores place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 44,573. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.7% of its score, are high-end desktop and mobile parts like the Intel Core i9-13950HX and Intel Core i5-14600. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded scores and sits at the 50th percentile, which in the database represents an unmeasured state.

The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, built for laptops and compact systems where power draw and integrated graphics matter. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, a larger 96 MB L3 cache, and higher clocks, built for performance. Anyone choosing between them should base the decision on the platform: Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 3 110 versus Socket AM5 for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The sockets are not interchangeable, so the motherboard and system form factor determine which CPU is viable.

From a performance standpoint, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the clear choice. It delivers roughly a 50% increase in cores and threads, a 12x larger L3 cache, and higher single-thread and boost frequencies. The Ryzen 3 110 offers lower power consumption and a smaller physical footprint, but the database contains no evidence of competitive benchmark performance. The verdict is straightforward: the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the higher-performing processor, while the Ryzen 3 110 serves the low-power mobile segment.