Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 308 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 207 | 217 | 228 | 347 |
| 1440p QHD | 259 | 272 | 286 | 434 |
| 1080p Full HD | 304 | 319 | 335 | 483 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers exceptional frame rates in Valorant, positioning the combo in the 79th percentile of all tested configurations. With average FPS ranging from 207 at 4K Ultra to 483 at 1080p Low, this system demonstrates that even a mid-range CPU and GPU pairing can saturate high-refresh-rate displays in competitive shooters. The measured data shows a system where the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's raw throughput combine to produce a highly responsive gaming experience across all tested settings.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that remains firmly GPU-bound at higher resolutions while showing CPU limitations at lower ones. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 483 FPS at 1080p to 434 FPS at 1440p—a 10.2% reduction—and then to 347 FPS at 4K, representing a 28.2% drop from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the Intel Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become progressively more significant as pixel count increases.
At High settings, the scaling is more aggressive: 319 FPS at 1080p drops to 272 FPS at 1440p (a 14.7% decrease) and then to 217 FPS at 4K (a 20.2% decrease from 1440p). This steeper decline at higher quality presets suggests that the additional shading work—particularly the 144 texture mapping units and 80 render output units—becomes a bottleneck as resolution and quality both increase. The 4K High result of 217 FPS still represents excellent playability, but the gap between Low and High at 4K (347 vs. 217 FPS) demonstrates how much headroom the GPU has when texture and shading complexity rises.
The Medium preset shows the most interesting scaling behavior. From 335 FPS at 1080p to 286 FPS at 1440p (14.6% drop) and 228 FPS at 4K (20.3% drop), this preset consistently sits between Low and High in performance, as expected. The Ultra preset, however, shows the tightest variance: 304 FPS at 1080p, 259 FPS at 1440p, and 207 FPS at 4K. This narrowing gap at Ultra suggests that the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads at up to 4.40 GHz boost clock are starting to contribute to the frame time budget, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance headroom. At 1080p Medium, the system produces 335 FPS average with a minimum of 285 FPS, ensuring that even frame-time spikes remain above the 240 Hz refresh rate common in competitive monitors. The jump from Low to Medium costs only 6.5% performance at 1080p (483 to 335 FPS), while the jump from Medium to High costs 4.8% (335 to 319 FPS). This suggests that Medium provides the most efficient use of GPU resources.
At 1440p, the Medium preset's 286 FPS average with a 243 FPS minimum keeps the experience smooth for high-refresh displays, while the Low preset's 434 FPS provides maximum competitive advantage for players prioritizing responsiveness over visuals. For 4K users, the data shows that Low (347 FPS) versus Ultra (207 FPS) represents a 67.6% performance delta, making Low the only sensible choice for 240 Hz displays at this resolution. However, for 60 Hz or 144 Hz 4K displays, Ultra's 207 FPS still exceeds the refresh rate, allowing players to enjoy maximum visual quality without compromising smoothness.
The Medium preset's consistency across all three resolutions—with the smallest relative gap between average and minimum FPS (85.1% of average at 1080p, 85.0% at 1440p, 85.1% at 4K)—indicates that this setting level produces the most stable frame delivery. This stability is particularly valuable in a tactical shooter like Valorant, where consistent frame pacing matters more than peak frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2279 out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant, placing it in the top 79% of all configurations. This ranking is notable given that the CPU's average benchmark score of 21088 places it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 20556 puts it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combination's game-specific ranking slightly trails its component averages, suggesting that Valorant's engine characteristics do not perfectly align with the strengths of this pairing.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks—the Intel Core i3-1220P (0.1% higher score), Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (0.1% lower), AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (0.2% lower), and Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (0.4% lower)—all perform within a tight band around the 5600G. This indicates that the 5600G's Zen 3 architecture, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides competitive single-threaded performance that is crucial for Valorant's game logic. The CPU's 3.90 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clocks, combined with its 16 MB L3 cache, deliver the responsiveness that the game's tick-based mechanics require.
For the GPU, the Arc B570's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher score), Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% higher), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% lower). The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves sufficient for Valorant's modest texture requirements even at 4K resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this system maintain 240 FPS at 1440p in Valorant?
A: Yes, at Low settings the average is 434 FPS, at Medium it drops to 286 FPS, and at High it remains at 272 FPS. All three presets exceed the 240 FPS threshold, though the Ultra preset at 259 FPS leaves minimal headroom.
Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: The Low preset averages 483 FPS while Ultra averages 304 FPS, representing a 37.1% performance reduction. This is the largest preset-to-preset gap measured, indicating that Ultra's additional shading work significantly impacts frame rates.
Q: How does the CPU's integrated graphics compare to the discrete GPU in this test?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600G includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, but all measured FPS data in this benchmark uses the discrete Intel Arc B570. The discrete GPU provides substantially higher performance, with the 1080p Low result of 483 FPS far exceeding what integrated graphics could deliver.
Q: Is the minimum FPS at 4K Medium sufficient for competitive play?
A: The 4K Medium preset shows a minimum FPS of 194, which is below the 240 Hz threshold but still well above 144 Hz. For competitive play at 4K, the Low preset's 347 FPS average provides more headroom.
Q: How does this combo compare to systems with newer CPUs?
A: The CPU's nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V and Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, score within 0.4% of the 5600G in synthetic benchmarks. This suggests that the 5600G remains competitive for Valorant despite being from an earlier generation.
Q: What is the best resolution for this system to maximize both visual quality and frame rate?
A: At 1440p Medium, the system produces 286 FPS with a 243 FPS minimum, offering a strong balance. For maximum frame rates, 1080p Low at 483 FPS is optimal, while 4K Ultra at 207 FPS provides the best visuals while still exceeding 144 Hz.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570's specifications directly influence the measured frame rates. With 2304 shading units operating at a 2500 MHz base and boost clock, the GPU delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This compute throughput, combined with 144 texture mapping units and 80 render output units, produces pixel rates of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rates of 360.0 GTexel/s. These figures explain why the GPU can sustain over 200 FPS even at 4K Ultra settings in Valorant.
The 10 GB GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Valorant's relatively simple scene geometry. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), and the GPU's 18 ray tracing cores and 72.1 million transistors per mm² density indicate a modern architecture capable of handling the game's DirectX 12 requirements. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the game's data transfer needs, though the measured results show that the GPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions.
At 1080p, the GPU's role becomes less critical—the 483 FPS at Low settings indicates that the CPU's single-thread performance is the limiting factor. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its proximity to the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% difference in average score) suggest that it punches above its weight class in this game. The Arc B570's 2500 MHz boost clock, while not the highest in its class, provides consistent performance that scales predictably with resolution changes.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G's 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture codenamed Cezanne, deliver the single-threaded performance that Valorant demands. The CPU's 3.90 GHz base clock and 4.40 GHz boost clock, combined with a 16 MB L3 cache, provide the low-latency instruction execution that the game's hit registration and ability mechanics require. The 7 nm process node from TSMC, containing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, contributes to the CPU's efficiency, though the 65 W TDP is not a factor in this analysis.
The CPU's benchmark scores reveal its strengths: a Cinebench R23 single-thread score of 1409 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1801 indicate strong per-core performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 872, while lower in absolute terms, confirms that the CPU can handle the game's logic thread without becoming a bottleneck. The PassMark single-thread score of 3177 places the 5600G in a competitive position against rivals like the Intel Core i3-1220P (0.1% difference in average score) and Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (0.1% difference).
The CPU's role becomes evident when examining the resolution scaling. At 1080p Low, the 483 FPS result suggests the CPU can feed the GPU faster than the GPU can render, but at 4K Ultra, the 207 FPS result indicates the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. The 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth (DDR4 dual-channel) provide sufficient data throughput for the game's assets, though the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 interface with 16 lanes may slightly limit GPU data transfer compared to newer PCIe Gen 4 systems.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 483 FPS, Medium averages 335 FPS with a minimum of 285 FPS and maximum of 385 FPS, High averages 319 FPS, and Ultra averages 304 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 179 FPS (37.1%), indicating that the GPU has significant headroom even at maximum quality settings.
At 2560x1440, performance scales predictably. Low averages 434 FPS, Medium averages 286 FPS (minimum 243 FPS, maximum 329 FPS), High averages 272 FPS, and Ultra averages 259 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p costs between 10.2% (Low) and 14.8% (Ultra) of performance, with the absolute FPS drop ranging from 45 to 49 FPS across presets.
At 3840x2160, the GPU faces its greatest challenge. Low averages 347 FPS, Medium averages 228 FPS (minimum 194 FPS, maximum 263 FPS), High averages 217 FPS, and Ultra averages 207 FPS. The 4K to 1440p scaling shows losses of 20.0% (Low), 20.3% (Medium), 20.2% (High), and 20.1% (Ultra) respectively, demonstrating consistent GPU scaling behavior. The Medium preset's minimum of 194 FPS at 4K remains the only measured result below 200 FPS, yet still comfortably exceeds standard 144 Hz display refresh rates.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B570 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 347.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 228.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 217.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 207.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 434.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 286.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 272.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 259.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 483.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 335.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 319.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 304.0 |
Valorant with Ryzen 5 5600G + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600G + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.