The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
74
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 41 54
1440p QHD 50 64 75 98
1080p Full HD 77 98 115 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 28
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Ultra 50
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 115
1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Ultra 77

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination delivers a highly capable, yet distinctly resolution-dependent experience in The Technomancer. The data shows this pairing ranks 1721st out of 2825 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this specific title. This rank is somewhat surprising given the CPU's 91st percentile standing among all processors, suggesting that the GPU is the primary factor limiting the combo's overall position. The benchmark results indicate a system that can comfortably handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high frame rates, but which struggles to maintain playable performance at 4K with maximum settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1721 out of 2825 tested configurations places it in the 39th percentile of all tested combos for The Technomancer. This is a modest result, especially when considering the individual components' standings. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D sits in the 91st percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54762. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, a difference of just -0.6%, indicating the AMD chip is essentially performance-equivalent to that Intel part in synthetic tests. The CPU is clearly a high-end part.

In contrast, the RTX 5050's percentile rank is 66 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, scores 21153, which is a -0.6% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, a +1.6% delta. These are older, lower-tier GPUs, and the RTX 5050 is only marginally faster or slower than them in aggregate benchmarks. This suggests the GPU is a mid-range or entry-level part in the current generation.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's more modest one is a key indicator. In a game like The Technomancer, which is an Action RPG from 2016, the rendering load often falls heavily on the GPU. The combo's rank of 1721, therefore, is likely dragged down by the GPU's performance ceiling rather than the CPU's capabilities. The data implies that the system is CPU-overpowered for the GPU it is paired with, meaning the RTX 5050 is probably the bottleneck in most scenarios. The 1721st rank is a reflection of the GPU's mid-pack performance, not the CPU's top-tier standing.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play The Technomancer with this combo for a smooth experience?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo averages 98 FPS, and at 2560x1440 with High settings, it averages 64 FPS. These are the two resolutions where the average frame rates are comfortably above 60 FPS, making them the most suitable for a consistently smooth experience.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. With High settings, the average FPS is 35, and with Ultra settings, it falls to 28 FPS. Only at Low settings does it reach an average of 54 FPS, indicating that 4K gaming is only viable with significant graphical compromises.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS at Low settings is 98, while at Ultra settings it is 50. This represents a 48 FPS drop, or roughly a 49% reduction in frame rate, when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor in this game?

A: The benchmark data suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The CPU's average benchmark score of 54762 places it in the 91st percentile, while the GPU's score of 21035 places it in the 66th percentile. The significant gap in percentile rankings indicates the GPU is the weaker component and likely the bottleneck.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for the Medium settings at various resolutions?

A: The measured data provides min FPS only for Medium settings. At 1920x1080, the min FPS is 98. At 2560x1440, the min FPS is 64. At 3840x2160, the min FPS is 35. These figures show that even the minimum frame rates at 1080p and 1440p are quite playable.

Q: How does this combo's rank compare to its component's individual performance?

A: The combo ranks 1721st out of 2825, which is in the lower half of tested combos. However, the CPU is in the 91st percentile and the GPU is in the 66th percentile. This mismatch suggests the combo's rank is more closely tied to the GPU's lower relative performance in this specific game.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 98 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the average drops to 64 FPS, a reduction of 34 FPS (approximately 35%). Further increasing to 3840x2160 at High settings yields an average of only 35 FPS, a further drop of 29 FPS (approximately 45%). This pattern shows that the performance cost of each resolution step is substantial.

This scaling behavior is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting component. The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. As resolution increases, the demand on memory bandwidth and the GPU's compute units (2560 shading units) grows exponentially. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, is unlikely to be the bottleneck at these higher resolutions because the workload shifts heavily towards the GPU's pixel and texture processing capabilities.

The data for Low settings reinforces this. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 150, at 1440p Low it is 98, and at 4K Low it is 54. The relative performance drops are consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 52 FPS (35%), and the 1440p to 4K drop is 44 FPS (45%). This linear degradation suggests that the system is not being held back by a CPU bottleneck at any resolution, as the frame rate scales directly with the number of pixels rendered. The conclusion is that the RTX 5050's rendering throughput is the primary factor determining performance across all tested resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For this combo, the measured data points to Medium settings as the optimal balance between visual quality and performance. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 FPS. This is a very playable experience with a high degree of smoothness, and the minimum frame rate indicates that there are no significant stutters. At 2560x1440, Medium provides an average of 75 FPS and a minimum of 64 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold for a generally smooth experience.

While High settings at 1080p (98 FPS) and 1440p (64 FPS) are also viable, they offer a lower performance headroom. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p results in an average FPS drop from 75 to 64, a difference of 11 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra at 1440p is even more punishing, dropping from 64 FPS to 50 FPS. The data suggests that the visual fidelity gains from High or Ultra may not justify the performance cost, especially when considering the minimum FPS figures.

At 4K, the situation is different. Even at Medium settings, the average FPS is only 41, with a minimum of 35. This is not a smooth experience for most players. The only 4K preset that approaches playability is Low, with an average of 54 FPS. However, this requires a significant reduction in graphical quality. Therefore, the recommendation is to stick with Medium settings for the best overall experience at 1080p or 1440p, and only consider 4K if the user is willing to accept Low settings for a playable frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full dataset for this combo in The Technomancer is as follows.

At 1920x1080, the performance is strong across all presets. Low settings yield the highest average FPS at 150. Medium settings average 115 FPS, with a minimum of 98 and a maximum of 132 FPS. High settings average 98 FPS. Ultra settings average 77 FPS. The system consistently delivers frame rates well above 60 FPS at this resolution, even at the highest quality preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains respectable but begins to show the GPU's limits. Low settings average 98 FPS. Medium settings average 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87 FPS. High settings average 64 FPS. Ultra settings average 50 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is the highest resolution at which the combo can maintain an average FPS above 60 with High settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops off considerably. Low settings are the only preset that averages above 50 FPS, achieving 54 FPS. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings average 35 FPS. Ultra settings average 28 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming is not a practical option for this combo unless the user prioritizes frame rate over all visual fidelity and selects Low settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its substantial 128 MB of L3 cache is a defining feature, which is often beneficial in gaming workloads. The CPU's benchmark results are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 and a single-core score of 6739.

In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU's role appears to be secondary. The game is from 2016, and its engine likely does not scale perfectly with 12 cores or 24 threads. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 3041) is more relevant for game logic and physics. However, the benchmark data shows that the combo's performance is heavily influenced by resolution, which points to a GPU bottleneck.

The 3DMark scores for the CPU show a clear scaling from 2 threads (2512) to 16 threads (12490), but the jump to max threads (13795) is modest. This suggests that the CPU's performance plateaus beyond 16 threads in many workloads. For a game like The Technomancer, the 12-core configuration is likely overkill, and the game is probably not using all available threads. The CPU's high percentile rank (91st) compared to the combo's overall rank (1721st) strongly suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor and that its performance is more than sufficient for this game, leaving the GPU as the performance ceiling.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. It has 2560 shading units and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. Its synthetic benchmark scores are modest, with a Passmark G3D score of 17326 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334. These figures place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's role in this combo is clearly the defining factor for gaming performance. The measured FPS data shows a strong correlation between resolution and frame rate, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound system. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming in a 2016 title, but it may become a constraint at 4K, especially with higher texture quality settings. The memory bandwidth of 320 GB/s is also a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the GPU needs to fetch more texture data.

The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is telling. It is within 1.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and within 1% of the AMD Radeon HD 8970M in average benchmark score. These are older, lower-tier parts, which underscores that the RTX 5050, while current-generation, is positioned as an entry-level or mid-range card. In The Technomancer, this means it can handle 1080p and 1440p with high frame rates, but its 32 ROPs and 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. The data confirms that the GPU's capabilities are the primary constraint on the combo's overall performance ranking.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.0
3840x2160 Medium 41.0
3840x2160 High 35.0
3840x2160 Ultra 28.0
2560x1440 Low 98.0
2560x1440 Medium 75.0
2560x1440 High 64.0
2560x1440 Ultra 50.0
1920x1080 Low 150.0
1920x1080 Medium 115.0
1920x1080 High 98.0
1920x1080 Ultra 77.0

The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.