The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 110 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 52 | 61 | 80 |
| 1440p QHD | 75 | 96 | 112 | 146 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 146 | 171 | 223 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis
# The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a thoroughly playable experience in The Technomancer across all tested resolutions, with the data showing a clear GPU-bound pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p, the pairing produces triple-digit frame rates at every settings tier, while 4K Ultra dips to 41 FPS, indicating that the RTX 3080 becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. The measured results place this combo at rank 758 out of 2825 tested configurations, solidly in the upper quartile of all possible pairings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in The Technomancer?
A: The data shows 1440p as the sweet spot. At High settings, the combo delivers 96 FPS average, which is comfortably above 60 FPS, while 4K High drops to 52 FPS and 1080p High reaches 146 FPS. The 1440p result balances visual fidelity with smooth performance, maintaining a strong margin over the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest rivals in overall GPU benchmarks?
A: The RTX 3080 posts an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitors are the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, 0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, 0.4% ahead). All four rivals are within half a percent of the RTX 3080's score, indicating a tightly clustered performance tier.
Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded capability in this configuration?
A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 22884. In PassMark multithread testing, it achieves 56154, while the average benchmark score across all tests is 54762, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.
Q: Which settings preset provides the highest frame rate at 1080p?
A: The data shows Low settings at 1080p produce 223 FPS average, which is the highest measured result across all resolution and settings combinations. Medium settings yield 171 FPS, High settings 146 FPS, and Ultra settings 114 FPS.
Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?
A: At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 146 FPS at 1080p to 96 FPS at 1440p, then to 52 FPS at 4K. This represents a 64% reduction from 1080p to 4K, demonstrating that the RTX 3080 becomes increasingly saturated as pixel count rises.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 a bottleneck at 1080p in this game?
A: No, the data indicates the opposite. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 223 FPS, and even at Ultra it maintains 114 FPS. These high frame rates suggest the GPU is not the primary constraint at this resolution, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739) providing ample headroom.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the primary renderer in this configuration, and its specifications directly shape the frame rates measured in The Technomancer. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for a 2016 title, and the data suggests it is more than sufficient for the game's demands at all tested settings and resolutions.
The RTX 3080's clock behavior is notable: it runs at a base clock of 1440 MHz and boosts to 1710 MHz. The boost clock is the effective operational speed during gaming workloads, and the measured FPS results indicate that this clock speed, combined with the GPU's 8704 shading units, delivers strong rasterization performance. The GPU's 96 ROPs and 272 TMUs contribute to pixel and texture throughput rates of 164.2 GPixel/s and 465.1 GTexel/s respectively, which are relevant for a game like The Technomancer that renders dense environments.
The GPU's overall benchmark standing reinforces its role. With an average benchmark score of 23172, the RTX 3080 sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score is 25086, while DirectX 11 testing yields 207 and DirectX 12 yields 100. These scores show that the GPU's DirectX 11 performance is roughly twice its DirectX 12 performance in synthetic tests, which is relevant for a 2016 title that likely uses older API paths. The GPU's Vulkan score of 33620 indicates strong modern API potential, but The Technomancer's engine will primarily stress the DirectX 11 path.
The RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM capacity is worth examining against the game's requirements. At 4K Ultra, the combo produces 41 FPS average, and at 4K High, 52 FPS average. These results suggest that VRAM capacity is not the limiting factor — the GPU's compute throughput is the more likely constraint at 4K. The memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s is ample for the game's textures and geometry, and the data shows that settings changes at 4K produce proportional FPS shifts rather than sudden drops that would indicate VRAM overflow.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate moves from 223 FPS at 1080p to 146 FPS at 1440p, then to 80 FPS at 4K. This represents a 64% drop from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the progression is 146 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K — a 64% reduction as well. The consistency of this scaling across settings tiers indicates that the RTX 3080 is the primary performance limiter as resolution increases.
The Medium settings rows provide the only min/max FPS data in the pack, which offers insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the average is 171 FPS with a minimum of 146 FPS and maximum of 197 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 112 FPS with a range of 95 to 129 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 71. The minimum FPS values track closely to the average, suggesting that the game maintains stable frame pacing rather than exhibiting severe drops.
The scaling pattern strongly indicates a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU's contribution becomes more significant, but the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739) ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU. As resolution rises, the GPU's workload increases disproportionately, and the RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the determining factor. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS average shows the GPU nearing its limits, while the 1080p Low result of 223 FPS demonstrates the headroom available when pixel count is low.
Settings Recommendations
The data supports High settings as the optimal balance for this configuration, particularly at 1440p. At 1440p High, the combo delivers 96 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Moving to Ultra at 1440p drops the average to 75 FPS — still playable, but the 21 FPS cost for the highest preset may not justify the visual gains. At 1080p, High settings provide 146 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate displays, while Ultra still achieves 114 FPS.
For 4K users, the recommendation shifts to Medium settings. The 4K Medium result of 61 FPS average is the only 4K preset that clears the 60 FPS barrier, with High at 52 FPS and Ultra at 41 FPS falling short. The Medium preset at 4K also shows a minimum FPS of 52, meaning the game rarely dips below playable territory. Low settings at 4K produce 80 FPS average, but the visual quality reduction is likely too severe for a game that benefits from detail.
The Ultra preset is difficult to recommend at any resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the 114 FPS average is respectable, but the step from High to Ultra costs 32 FPS (from 146 to 114). At 1440p, the cost is 21 FPS (from 96 to 75), and at 4K, it is 11 FPS (from 52 to 41). The data shows diminishing returns from High to Ultra, making High the sensible default choice. The Medium preset offers a safety margin for users who prioritize consistent frame times, particularly at 4K where the 61 FPS average with a 52 FPS minimum provides the most stable experience above 60 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the configuration produces its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings yield 223 FPS average, Medium settings 171 FPS (with a range of 146 to 197), High settings 146 FPS, and Ultra settings 114 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 109 FPS, demonstrating that settings have a substantial impact at this resolution. The 1080p results show that the combo has significant headroom for high-refresh-rate displays, with even Ultra settings exceeding 100 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the expected reduction. Low settings deliver 146 FPS, Medium settings 112 FPS (range of 95 to 129), High settings 96 FPS, and Ultra settings 75 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings tiers: roughly 35% for Low, 35% for Medium, 34% for High, and 34% for Ultra. The 1440p results indicate that the RTX 3080 handles this resolution comfortably, with every preset except Ultra staying above 90 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the performance landscape changes significantly. Low settings produce 80 FPS average, Medium settings 61 FPS (range of 52 to 71), High settings 52 FPS, and Ultra settings 41 FPS. The 4K results show that only Low and Medium presets maintain playable frame rates above 60 FPS on average. The drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p transition: approximately 45% for Low, 46% for Medium, 46% for High, and 45% for Ultra. This steeper decline at higher resolutions reinforces the GPU-bound nature of the workload, as the RTX 3080's fill rate and compute capacity become the bottleneck.
The Medium settings rows provide the only complete min/max data across all resolutions. At 1080p, the spread from minimum to maximum is 51 FPS (146 to 197), at 1440p it is 34 FPS (95 to 129), and at 4K it is 19 FPS (52 to 71). The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that frame pacing becomes more consistent as the GPU approaches its saturation point, with less variance in rendering times.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D provides the computational foundation for this configuration, and its specifications indicate it is well-suited to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 3080 in The Technomancer. The CPU features 12 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and boosting to 5.50 GHz. This high boost clock is critical for gaming performance, as many titles rely on single-thread performance for game logic and physics.
The CPU's benchmark results confirm its strength. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739 and multi-core score of 47737 place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The Geekbench single-core score of 3041 and multi-core score of 22884 further substantiate its capability. The PassMark single-thread score of 4646 and multithread score of 56154 show balanced performance across both metrics.
In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, where the GPU workload is lightest, the combo achieves 223 FPS. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its limits without becoming a constraint. The CPU's 3DMark results support this: single-thread score of 1269, 2-thread score of 2512, 4-thread score of 4885, 8-thread score of 9002, and max-thread score of 13795. The scaling from 2 to 8 threads shows good utilization of additional cores, while the max-thread score confirms that the 12-core, 24-thread configuration can handle heavily threaded workloads.
The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are all Intel parts: the Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093 average, 0.6% behind), Core Ultra 5 245K (54053 average, 1.3% ahead), Xeon 6505P (53701 average, 2% ahead), and Core i7-14700F (53620 average, 2.1% ahead). The 9900X3D's average benchmark score of 54762 sits between these competitors, showing that it is competitive with modern mid-range and workstation CPUs. For The Technomancer, this level of CPU performance ensures that frame rates are determined by the GPU at standard resolutions, and even at 1080p where CPU overhead is more visible, the 9900X3D's strong single-thread performance prevents it from limiting the RTX 3080's output.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 80.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 61.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 146.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 75.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 223.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 171.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 146.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 114.0 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 3080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.