The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with both resolution and graphical presets. This analysis examines the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D processor paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT graphics card across a matrix of settings. The data indicates a configuration capable of high refresh rate gameplay at 1080p, but one that becomes increasingly constrained by the GPU as resolution climbs to 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high frame rates?

A: At 1920x1080, the combination delivers an average of 138 FPS on Medium settings and 117 FPS on High settings, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. At 2560x1440, the averages drop to 90 FPS on Medium and 77 FPS on High, which remains smooth, but at 3840x2160, even High settings yield only 42 FPS on average.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D compare to its closest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,573, placing it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. It is 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-14600, which scores 44,889.

Q: What is the performance delta between the RX 6750 XT and its nearest rival?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,011. It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.6% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7100, 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro D700, and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K. The frame rate drops dramatically from 1080p to 4K, indicating the rendering workload is overwhelming the graphics card. For instance, on High settings, the average FPS falls from 117 at 1080p to 42 at 4K, a reduction that points heavily toward GPU-bound performance.

Q: What is the range of performance for the Medium preset across all resolutions?

A: The Medium preset shows a clear scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the average is 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 158 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average is 90 FPS with a range of 76 to 103 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average is 49 FPS with a range of 42 to 57 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 1262 out of 2825 total tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the upper half of tested configurations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is built on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The processor includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache is a defining characteristic of the X3D series, designed to improve gaming performance by reducing memory latency.

In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU’s role appears to be providing a stable foundation for the GPU to work. The benchmark results show that at 1080p, the system achieves very high frame rates, such as 179 FPS on Low settings and 117 FPS on High settings. These numbers suggest that the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is not presenting a significant bottleneck at this resolution, allowing the RX 6750 XT to operate near its full potential. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score is 3,494, and its multithread score is 25,047, indicating strong per-core performance that is beneficial for game logic and physics. Its percentile ranking against all CPUs is 89, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

When comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the performance is very tight. The average benchmark score of 44,573 is only 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX. This indicates that while the 7500X3D is a top-tier performer, the differences between it and other high-end chips are marginal in synthetic benchmarks. For a game like The Technomancer, the CPU’s robust cache and high single-thread performance are likely more impactful than raw core counts, ensuring that frame pacing remains consistent even when the GPU is under heavy load. The 65 W TDP also suggests efficient operation, though it does not directly translate to game performance. The data shows that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p, as the frame rates scale predictably with graphical settings, a sign of a balanced system at that resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and utilizes the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. It contains 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS.

In The Technomancer, the GPU’s role is dominant, especially at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates show a clear correlation between resolution and performance, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080, the GPU can produce an average of 179 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 92 FPS on Ultra. This indicates that even at 1080p, the graphical settings have a significant impact on the GPU’s workload. The 12 GB of VRAM is a substantial amount, and while the game’s specific VRAM usage is not in the data, the capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor at these settings.

The GPU’s performance relative to its rivals is notably close. Its average benchmark score of 26,011 is just 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and 0.7% higher than the AMD FirePro D700. This suggests that the RX 6750 XT is a solid performer, but it is not in a class of its own. In the context of The Technomancer, the GPU’s raw compute power determines the frame rate ceiling. The transition from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K shows a consistent and significant drop in average FPS across all presets. For example, on High settings, the average frame rate falls from 117 at 1080p, to 77 at 1440p, and finally to 42 at 4K. This pattern clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the rendering demands outpace the card’s capabilities. The 250 W TDP and dual-slot design are notable physical characteristics, but they do not influence the measured FPS. The data suggests that for a smooth 60 FPS experience, the RX 6750 XT is best suited for 1080p Ultra or 1440p High settings, while 4K requires a significant reduction in preset to maintain playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1262 out of 2825 total tested combos in The Technomancer. This position places it in the 55th percentile of all configurations, indicating that it performs better than a majority of systems but is outclassed by a significant portion of high-end builds. The ranking reflects a balance between a very strong CPU and a mid-to-high-tier GPU. The CPU’s high percentile ranking of 89 and the GPU’s percentile ranking of 71 contribute to this overall standing.

This rank suggests that while the CPU is capable of supporting much faster graphics cards, the RX 6750 XT is the performance-limiting component in this pairing. The combo’s position in the middle of the pack is not a reflection of poor performance, but rather an indication that many other tested configurations feature more powerful GPUs. In the context of the benchmark database, this combo sits in the upper half, meaning it will outpace a large number of systems, particularly those with older or less powerful components. The ranking underscores the importance of the GPU in this specific game, as the CPU’s strength cannot fully compensate for the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions. The data shows that for users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this rank is quite respectable, but for 4K enthusiasts, higher-ranked combos with more powerful GPUs would be necessary to achieve higher frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable. On Low settings, it achieves an average of 179 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 and a maximum of 158. High settings yield an average of 117 FPS, and the Ultra preset, while demanding, still produces a smooth average of 92 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo can handle any preset with ease, offering a wide range of options for competitive or visually demanding play.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings produce an average of 117 FPS, which is identical to the 1080p High preset. Medium settings average 90 FPS, with a range of 76 to 103 FPS. High settings deliver a solid 77 FPS average, while Ultra settings bring the average down to exactly 60 FPS. The 1440p results show that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution, with the Medium and High presets offering the best balance of visual quality and smoothness. The Ultra preset is also playable, but it sits at the threshold of 60 FPS, which may not be ideal for all users.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings yield an average of 64 FPS, which is the only preset to maintain a comfortable frame rate. Medium settings average 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 and a maximum of 57. High settings drop to an average of 42 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to an average of 33 FPS. The 4K data shows a steep performance cliff, indicating that the RX 6750 XT does not have enough raw power to maintain high frame rates at this resolution. Even the Medium preset, which is often a recommended balance, struggles to stay above 50 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant compromises in graphical fidelity to achieve playable frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. The average of 92 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a visually rich experience without sacrificing smoothness. For users with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 117 FPS offers an excellent balance, while the Medium preset at 138 FPS is ideal for competitive play where maximum frame rate is prioritized.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the best overall choice. The average of 77 FPS provides a smooth experience that is suitable for most action RPGs. The Medium preset, at 90 FPS, is a strong alternative for users who prefer higher frame rates, and it still maintains a high level of visual quality. The Ultra preset, while hitting exactly 60 FPS on average, is viable, but it leaves no headroom for demanding scenes, making High the safer and more consistent option.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations change drastically. The Low preset, with an average of 64 FPS, is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset, at 49 FPS, is playable but may be subject to noticeable frame drops in intense combat. High and Ultra settings are not recommended for 4K, as their averages of 42 and 33 FPS respectively will result in a suboptimal gameplay experience. The data suggests that for 4K, users should either accept the visual compromises of the Low preset or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a significantly better balance of quality and performance.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K provides clear insight into the system’s bottleneck. At 1080p, the average FPS across all presets is very high, ranging from 92 on Ultra to 179 on Low. When moving to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 40-50% across all presets. For example, on High settings, the average falls from 117 to 77, a reduction of 40 FPS. This significant drop indicates that the GPU is beginning to feel the pressure of increased pixel count.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more dramatic. On High settings, the average falls from 77 to 42, a reduction of 35 FPS. On Medium settings, the average drops from 90 to 49, a 41 FPS reduction. This pattern is a textbook example of GPU-bound performance. The CPU, with its high performance, is not the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain relatively consistent across resolutions, as the CPU workload is primarily determined by game logic, not pixel count. Instead, the frame rate plummets as resolution increases, directly demonstrating that the RX 6750 XT’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint.

The data shows that the transition from 1080p to 4K represents a 4x increase in pixel count, and the frame rates reflect this. On Low settings, the average goes from 179 at 1080p to 64 at 4K, a 64% reduction. On Ultra settings, the average goes from 92 at 1080p to 33 at 4K, a 64% reduction as well. The consistent percentage drop across all presets confirms that the scaling is purely resolution-driven. This analysis indicates that for this game and this combo, the CPU has ample headroom, and the GPU is the component that determines the playable resolution and settings. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need a more powerful GPU, while the Ryzen 5 7500X3D would be well-suited to support such an upgrade without becoming a bottleneck.