Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a solid, if not spectacular, experience in Control. The data shows a pairing where the GPU is the primary driver of performance, with the CPU providing ample headroom. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, component roles, and how this specific combo stacks up against the broader tested field.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture. It operates at a base clock of 4.00 GHz and can boost up to 4.50 GHz. This configuration, combined with a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, gives it strong gaming credentials. In the context of Control, an Action Adventure title, the CPU's job is to manage game logic, physics, and draw calls, all while feeding the GPU with data.

The benchmark results indicate that this processor is more than up to the task. Across all tested resolutions and settings, the CPU does not appear to be the limiting factor. The measured FPS scales predictably with GPU load, suggesting the 7500X3D has enough headroom to keep the RX 6750 XT fed. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3494 and multithread score of 25047 place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong performance for gaming workloads that often rely on a few fast cores.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the PassMark database, the 7500X3D's average benchmark score of 44573 is competitive. It sits just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX. Conversely, it trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7%. These are marginal differences, reinforcing that the 7500X3D is a high-performing chip that won't bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The data implies that for Control, the CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame pipeline, and it does so without issue, allowing the graphics card to dictate the final output.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the clear workhorse in this pairing. Built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, it features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 2150 MHz, with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. These specifications are well-suited for a visually demanding title like Control, which features complex physics and particle effects.

The GPU's performance is the primary variable in the measured FPS. As settings and resolution increase, frame rates drop, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload. The 12 GB of VRAM is a key asset here, as it likely prevents memory-related stutters at 4K resolution with higher texture settings. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20700 places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, has a score of 25740, which is 1.1% higher, showing the 6750 XT is in the same performance ballpark as that mobile flagship.

The data suggests the RX 6750 XT is capable of delivering playable frame rates, but its limits are tested at 4K Ultra settings. The jump from 42 FPS at 4K Ultra to 48 FPS at 4K High shows a meaningful performance cost for the highest quality presets. This indicates that while the GPU is powerful, it requires careful settings management to achieve a smooth experience at higher resolutions. Its 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is substantial, yet the game's engine still pushes it to its limits.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Control smoothly at 1080p?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows excellent performance at 1920x1080. Even at Ultra settings, the average FPS is 81. At High settings, it jumps to 94 FPS, and at Low settings, it reaches 148 FPS. The Medium preset shows an average of 105 FPS, making any setting at this resolution perfectly playable.

Q: What is the best resolution for a 60+ FPS experience?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot for a consistent 60+ FPS experience. At 1440p High, the average FPS is 71, and at Medium, it's 80. Even at Ultra, it maintains a 62 FPS average. 4K is more demanding, with only the Low preset (76 FPS) exceeding 60 FPS on average.

Q: How much of a performance hit does the Ultra preset take compared to High?

A: The cost of Ultra is significant. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 94 (High) to 81 (Ultra), a 13 FPS reduction. At 1440p, the drop is from 71 to 62 FPS, a 9 FPS reduction. At 4K, the drop is from 48 to 42 FPS, a 6 FPS reduction. The impact is less severe at higher resolutions, where the GPU is already the bottleneck.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: It is viable for less demanding settings. The 4K Low preset produces an average of 76 FPS, which is smooth. However, 4K High (48 FPS) and 4K Ultra (42 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating a compromise in visual fidelity is necessary for a fluid experience at this resolution.

Q: Is this system more limited by the CPU or the GPU?

A: The data strongly points to the GPU being the limiting factor. The FPS scales consistently with resolution changes, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's high benchmark scores and percentile ranking (89th) suggest it has ample power to keep up, and its performance does not appear to be the cause of frame rate drops at higher settings.

Q: How does this combo's performance compare to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1267th out of 2888 tested combinations in Control. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, indicating it is a capable pairing. While not in the top tier, it outperforms a majority of the configurations in the database for this specific game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. The table below outlines the exact average frame rates, with minimum and maximum figures where available.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :---------- | :------ | :------ |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | High | 48 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Low | 76 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Medium | 54 | 46 | 62 |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Ultra | 42 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | High | 71 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Low | 112 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Medium| 80 | 68 | 92 |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Ultra | 62 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | High | 94 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Low | 148 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Medium| 105 | 90 | 121 |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Ultra | 81 | - | - |

The data shows a clear hierarchy. At 1080p, all presets are well above the 60 FPS mark, with even the most demanding Ultra preset averaging 81 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the Ultra preset just barely holds onto a 62 FPS average, while High and Medium remain comfortably above. At 4K, the only settings that achieve a 60+ FPS average is Low, which hits 76 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum FPS of 46, indicating potential for noticeable dips in demanding scenes.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 94 at 1080p to 71 at 1440p, a 24.5% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K High, the FPS drops from 71 to 48, a further 32.4% reduction. This steep decline indicates that the RX 6750 XT is struggling to maintain frame rates as the pixel count increases dramatically.

This pattern is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. The average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 81, which drops to 62 at 1440p (a 23.5% decrease) and then to 42 at 4K (a 32.3% decrease from 1440p). These percentages show that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU is not able to compensate for the increased rendering load. The data implies that Control is heavily reliant on GPU compute and memory bandwidth, and the RX 6750 XT's 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The scaling is not linear, with the largest absolute FPS drops occurring between 1440p and 4K, highlighting the significant strain 4K rendering places on this GPU.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data offers a clear guide for optimizing the experience. For a 1080p display, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 81 FPS while providing the highest visual quality. The cost in FPS from High to Ultra is acceptable given the smoothness retained.

For 1440p, the High preset is the recommended starting point, with an average of 71 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset is also viable, with a 62 FPS average, but it leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset, with an 80 FPS average, is a safer option for those who prioritize a higher frame rate buffer.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset is the only one that averages above 60 FPS (76 FPS), making it the recommended setting for a smooth experience. The Medium preset, with a 54 FPS average and a minimum of 46 FPS, is a compromise that may be acceptable for players who prefer higher details over absolute smoothness. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended for 4K if a consistent 60 FPS target is desired, as their averages fall to 48 and 42 FPS, respectively. The data suggests that for the best overall experience, 1440p High or Ultra offers the ideal balance of quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Control, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1267th out of 2888 total configurations. This places it in the 56th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all tested systems. While it is not a top-tier combination, it is a respectable mid-range performer.

The rank indicates that the combination is well-balanced for this title. The CPU's strong performance, with a PassMark average score of 44573 and a 89th percentile ranking, ensures it is not a weak link. The GPU, with a 71st percentile ranking, is the component that holds the system back from higher performance tiers. The delta between CPU and GPU percentile rankings suggests that a more powerful GPU would yield significant gains in this game, as the CPU would likely support it without becoming a new bottleneck. This ranking reflects a system that delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience, but is not optimized for the highest-end 4K gameplay.