Revolution Idle
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 46 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 23 | 24 | 32 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 44 | 46 | 61 |
| 1080p Full HD | 44 | 69 | 72 | 96 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Revolution Idle with Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
Revolution Idle is not a demanding title, and the measured data for the Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 confirms that this combination is firmly overqualified for the game at most settings. The benchmark results indicate that the primary challenge is not raw horsepower but finding the right balance between frame rate and visual fidelity, as the GPU's performance curve shows dramatic drops at higher resolutions and presets. For the best experience, the data points to a specific settings and resolution pairing that consistently delivers smooth gameplay without pushing the hardware to its limits.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this CPU and GPU combo in Revolution Idle?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 96 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to its closest rival in overall benchmark scores?
A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49228, making them statistically equivalent in performance.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded on the Medium preset at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 20, with a maximum of 27 and an average of 24 FPS.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 more powerful than the Intel Arc A750 based on the data?
A: The data shows they are nearly identical. The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Intel Arc A750 has a score of 20582, a difference of -0.1% for the B570.
Q: What is the performance percentile of the Intel Core i5-14600KF compared to all other CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile, indicating it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the benchmark database.
Q: What is the difference in average FPS between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440 resolution, the Low preset averages 61 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 28 FPS, a difference of 33 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data clearly indicates that the Ultra preset is not viable for smooth gameplay at any resolution tested with this hardware. At 1920x1080, Ultra yields an average of 44 FPS, which drops to 28 FPS at 2560x1440 and plummets to 15 FPS at 3840x2160. These figures fall below the threshold for a consistently fluid experience, especially at higher resolutions. The data suggests that the Ultra preset places an excessive load on the Intel Arc B570's resources, likely due to its 10 GB VRAM allocation and 160-bit memory bus, which may struggle with the preset's demands.
Conversely, the Low preset provides the highest frame rates across all resolutions, but it does so by sacrificing visual quality. The data shows that the Medium preset offers a more balanced approach, providing a significant improvement in frame rate over High while maintaining better visual fidelity than Low. At 1920x1080, Medium averages 72 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS, which is a highly playable range. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS, which is still acceptable for a game of this genre.
Therefore, the optimal experience is achieved with the Medium preset at 1920x1080. This configuration delivers an average of 72 FPS and a minimum of 62 FPS, ensuring that frame pacing remains stable without the risk of noticeable stutter. The jump from 44 FPS on High to 72 FPS on Medium at 1080p represents a 63.6% improvement in average frame rate, making Medium the clear choice for a smooth experience. At 1440p, Medium is also the best balance, as its 46 FPS average is more than 50% higher than the 28 FPS average of Ultra, while the visual uplift over Low is substantial.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary limiting factor in this configuration, even for an idle game. At the Medium preset, the average frame rate drops from 72 FPS at 1920x1080 to 46 FPS at 2560x1440, a 36.1% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160, the average falls to 24 FPS, which is a 66.7% decrease from the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is being heavily taxed by the increase in pixel count, despite the game's relatively simple graphics.
This pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low, the average frame rate drops from 96 FPS at 1080p to 61 FPS at 1440p and then to 32 FPS at 4K. The 4K Low preset performance of 32 FPS is particularly telling, as it is only slightly higher than the 24 FPS average of the Medium preset at the same resolution. This suggests that even at the lowest settings, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The Intel Arc B570's pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, while respectable, are clearly not enough to handle the 8.3 million pixels of a 4K display without significant performance degradation.
In contrast, the CPU's role in resolution scaling appears minimal. The Intel Core i5-14600KF's robust single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594, is more than enough to feed the GPU at any resolution. The consistent frame rate drops with increasing resolution point squarely at the GPU as the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would remain relatively constant across resolutions, which is not the case in this data. The data strongly suggests that for 4K gaming in Revolution Idle, the Intel Arc B570 is underpowered, and users should stick to 1440p or lower for a satisfactory experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of performance across the four settings. The Low preset delivers the highest average frame rate at 96 FPS. The Medium preset follows with an average of 72 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS, indicating a stable frame time. The High preset averages 69 FPS, which is surprisingly close to Medium, suggesting that the visual differences between these two presets have a minimal impact on performance at this resolution. The Ultra preset is the outlier, with an average of 44 FPS, a significant drop from the other presets. This 44 FPS figure is less than half of the Low preset's performance, highlighting the massive cost of the Ultra preset's graphical enhancements.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease across the board. The Low preset remains the fastest with an average of 61 FPS. The Medium preset averages 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53. The High preset averages 44 FPS, which is now nearly identical to the Medium preset's performance, whereas at 1080p there was a 3 FPS difference. This convergence suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, reducing the performance gap between Medium and High. The Ultra preset shows a drastic drop to 28 FPS, making it effectively unplayable for most users. The 33 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is stark.
At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly poor. The Low preset achieves an average of 32 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches playability. The Medium preset averages 24 FPS, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 27, indicating that even its frame pacing is inconsistent. The High preset averages 23 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 15 FPS. The data shows a clear pattern: at 4K, the difference between Low and High is only 9 FPS, while the difference between Low and Ultra is 17 FPS. This indicates that the GPU's performance ceiling is being hit, and the visual fidelity settings have diminishing returns as the resolution increases.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570's specifications play a critical role in the observed performance. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a likely culprit for the poor 4K performance. The high resolution demands a large frame buffer, and while 10 GB is sufficient in terms of capacity, the 160-bit bus may not provide enough bandwidth to efficiently feed the GPU's 2304 shading units at 4K. The data supports this theory, as the frame rate drops are disproportionately large when moving from 1440p to 4K.
The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base and boost of 2500 MHz. This consistent clock speed suggests that the card is not thermally throttling, but rather hitting a performance wall due to other bottlenecks. The FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is a measure of the GPU's raw compute power, and while it is substantial, it is not enough to overcome the memory bandwidth limitations at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s is another critical metric; at 4K, the GPU must fill over 8 million pixels per frame, and a 200.0 GPixel/s rate is clearly insufficient to maintain high frame rates when combined with complex shaders.
The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and PassMark G3D score of 14195 place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This mid-range positioning is consistent with the measured frame rates in Revolution Idle, where it excels at 1080p but struggles at 4K. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, has a nearly identical average score of 20534, a 0.1% difference, but the desktop RTX 3070 would likely have different thermal and power characteristics. The data suggests that the Arc B570 is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but its architecture is not optimized for 4K gaming in this title.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This high boost clock is crucial for gaming performance, as it ensures that the CPU can quickly process the game's logic and input commands. The CPU's benchmark scores reflect its strength: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and a single-core score of 4594. The single-core score is particularly relevant for Revolution Idle, as idle games often rely on a single thread for their simulation logic, though the game's genre suggests it is not CPU-intensive.
The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache is another important factor. This large cache can store frequently accessed game data, reducing the need to fetch data from slower system memory. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides ample bandwidth for feeding the GPU. With 20 threads and high clock speeds, the i5-14600KF provides more than enough processing power for this game, as evidenced by the fact that frame rates are clearly GPU-limited at all resolutions and settings.
The CPU's overall performance is strong, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 49394 is slightly higher than its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49228. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration. At 1080p Low, the frame rate of 96 FPS is likely close to the game's engine limit or the GPU's maximum output, rather than a CPU limitation. The CPU's robust single-thread performance ensures that it can maintain high frame rates without stuttering, as the minimum FPS figures for the Medium preset at 1080p (62 FPS) and 1440p (39 FPS) are quite stable. The conclusion is that the i5-14600KF is an overqualified partner for the Arc B570 in this title, and users should focus on GPU settings to improve performance.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc B570 in Revolution Idle
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 24.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 23.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 61.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 96.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 72.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 44.0 |
Revolution Idle with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Revolution Idle with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.