Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that stresses system component interaction rather than pure graphical fidelity. The benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 reveals a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and settings, with the GPU acting as the primary performance governor at higher loads. The measured FPS figures show a clear progression from high refresh rate capability at 1080p to playable, though less fluid, performance at 4K, providing a detailed look at how this specific hardware combination handles the game's demands.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and tells a clear story about the system's bottleneck. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average frame rate falls from 151 FPS to 95 FPS, a reduction of 56 FPS. The scaling to 4K is even more pronounced: at 3840x2160 High settings, the average dips to 50 FPS. This represents a 101 FPS drop from the 1080p High result, indicating that the rendering load at 4K is nearly three times heavier on the graphics pipeline.

The pattern is consistent across all quality presets. At Low settings, the jump from 1080p (302 FPS) to 1440p (191 FPS) sees a 111 FPS decline, while 4K Low (100 FPS) is 202 FPS below the 1080p figure. Medium settings show a similar trajectory: 214 FPS at 1080p, 135 FPS at 1440p, and 71 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings are the most demanding, dropping from 144 FPS at 1080p to 91 FPS at 1440p and finally to 47 FPS at 4K.

These numbers suggest that the RTX 3070's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit memory bus are being pushed to their limits at 4K. The game's simulation logic, which relies on the CPU for tracking component interactions and system building tasks, is not the limiting factor here. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see less dramatic scaling between resolutions, as the CPU workload would remain constant while the GPU load changes. Instead, the significant FPS reductions at higher resolutions point directly to the GPU as the constraining component.

The data also reveals that the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (302 FPS) and Ultra (144 FPS) is 158 FPS, a 52% reduction. At 4K, the same comparison shows a difference of only 53 FPS (100 FPS vs 47 FPS). This compression of performance at 4K further confirms that the GPU is saturated, as the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are insufficient to fully leverage the higher quality settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 brings 14 cores and 14 threads to the system, operating with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This Arrow Lake-S architecture processor, built on a 3 nm process, demonstrates strong single-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648. Its multi-core capabilities are equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is primarily tied to the simulation of system components, compatibility checks, and the logic behind building and configuring PCs. The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is more than capable of handling these tasks, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved at 1080p. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the system reaches 302 FPS, which is well beyond what most displays can show. This high ceiling suggests that the CPU is not creating any meaningful performance ceiling at lower resolutions.

The processor's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for the game's data streaming requirements. The Passmark multithread score of 38706 and single-thread score of 4394 indicate balanced performance that can handle both the game's simulation threads and its rendering tasks without contention.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals shows it sits in a competitive position. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average benchmark score of 49196, which is 0.4% higher than the Core Ultra 5 245's 48995 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, a 0.5% advantage, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 0.6% lower at 48698. The Intel Core i5-14600K trails by 0.8% with a score of 48618. These tight margins indicate that the Core Ultra 5 245 is performing at a level consistent with other mid-range and high-end desktop processors.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs further reinforces its capability. In this game, the data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the frame rates scale primarily with GPU load. Even at 4K Ultra settings, where the average FPS drops to 47, the CPU is still able to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain playable frame rates, albeit with the GPU working at maximum capacity.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the more critical component in this configuration for Pc Building Simulator. This Ampere architecture GPU, built on an 8 nm process, features 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a key factor in how the card performs at different resolutions and settings.

The GPU's clock speeds of 1500 MHz base and 1725 MHz boost, combined with its 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance, allow it to handle the game's rendering requirements efficiently. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and the Passmark G3D score of 22214 place the card in a solid mid-range position, though the 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates there is faster hardware available.

The RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM capacity appears to be a limiting factor at 4K with higher quality settings. The game's textures and rendering effects at 4K Ultra likely exceed what 8 GB can efficiently handle, contributing to the 47 FPS average at that configuration. In contrast, at 1080p, the same VRAM is sufficient, allowing the card to achieve 144 FPS at Ultra settings.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17208 places it close to several rivals. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17083, which is 0.7% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 is 1% lower at 17037. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, 1.1% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% higher at 17468. These small deltas show that the RTX 3070 is performing in a predictable range for its class.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is a crucial specification for this game. At 4K, the higher resolution demands more memory bandwidth to move texture and geometry data. The measured FPS drop from 100 FPS at 4K Low to 47 FPS at 4K Ultra is a direct consequence of the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth when handling higher quality assets at that resolution. The GPU is clearly the bottleneck in this configuration, especially at 4K and when using High or Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 1233 out of 3002 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This places the configuration in the 41st percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 59% of the combinations that have been benchmarked. Given the CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking, the combo's overall position is lower than what the CPU alone would suggest, highlighting the GPU's role as the performance limiter.

The ranking of 1233 out of 3002 indicates that this is a mid-pack configuration overall. It is not a top-tier system, but it is also far from the bottom. The 4K Ultra performance of 47 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay, which likely contributes to the combo's mid-range ranking. Conversely, the 1080p performance is excellent, with all settings achieving over 144 FPS, which would place the combo much higher in rankings if only 1080p performance were considered.

The data suggests that the combo's ranking is heavily influenced by its 4K performance. At 1440p, the system is more competitive, with High settings achieving 95 FPS and Ultra reaching 91 FPS, both of which are respectable. The 4K results, however, drag the overall ranking down, as the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates at that resolution with higher quality settings.

Settings Recommendations

For this configuration, the best experience depends on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset provides an average of 214 FPS with a minimum of 182 FPS and maximum of 246 FPS. This is an excellent balance, as the frame rates are well above what any standard display can show, and the quality is noticeably better than Low settings. The High preset at 1080p yields 151 FPS, which is still very smooth, but the Medium preset's higher frame rate and only slightly lower visual quality make it the better choice for most users.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again stands out with an average of 135 FPS, a minimum of 115 FPS, and a maximum of 155 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with good visual quality. The High preset at 95 FPS is also playable, but the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold with less risk of noticeable frame drops.

For 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset achieves 100 FPS, but the visual quality is poor. The Medium preset offers 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS, which is the best balance for 4K. It maintains playable frame rates while providing better visual fidelity than Low. The High preset at 50 FPS and Ultra at 47 FPS are below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in less smooth gameplay, making Medium the recommended setting for 4K.

The Ultra preset, while offering the best visual quality, provides diminishing returns in terms of performance at all resolutions. At 1080p it reaches 144 FPS, but the difference from Medium is only 70 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 47 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for many users.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 302 FPS. Medium settings achieve 214 FPS with a minimum of 182 FPS and maximum of 246 FPS. High settings reach 151 FPS, and Ultra settings hit 144 FPS. These numbers show that the system can easily handle 1080p gaming with any preset, making it ideal for high refresh rate displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected drop from 1080p. Low settings average 191 FPS. Medium settings achieve 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and maximum of 155 FPS. High settings reach 95 FPS, and Ultra settings hit 91 FPS. This resolution is well-suited for the combo, with all presets maintaining frame rates above 90 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings average 100 FPS. Medium settings achieve 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS. High settings reach 50 FPS, and Ultra settings hit 47 FPS. The Medium preset is the only option at 4K that consistently stays at or above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for this resolution.

The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings across all resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum is 182 FPS; at 1440p, it is 115 FPS; and at 4K, it is 60 FPS. These minimums indicate that the Medium preset provides stable frame pacing, with no significant stutters or drops below the average.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 2560x1440 offers the best balance of performance and visual quality. At Medium settings, it achieves 135 FPS average with a minimum of 115 FPS, providing smooth gameplay with good fidelity. 1920x1080 is also excellent, with Medium settings hitting 214 FPS average.

Q: Can this system run the game at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at Medium settings. The 4K Medium preset delivers 71 FPS average with a minimum of 60 FPS. High settings drop to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), 0.6% faster than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), and 0.8% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600K (48618).

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings achieve 302 FPS average, while Ultra settings reach 144 FPS. This represents a 158 FPS difference, or a 52% reduction in performance when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 rank among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 ranks in the 61st percentile among all GPUs based on its average benchmark score of 17208. It is 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083), 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037), and 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019), but 1.5% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468).

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in this game?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 1233 out of 3002 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the upper-middle range of all tested configurations, with the GPU being the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.