Fortnite
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 119 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 51 | 66 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 96 | 124 | 176 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 152 | 196 | 278 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fortnite with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers a highly playable Fortnite experience across most settings, with the data showing a clear shift from GPU-bound performance at 4K to a more balanced profile at 1080p. The measured frame rates indicate that this pairing is capable of exceeding 100 FPS at 1440p on High settings, while the Ultra preset demands significantly more from the hardware, resulting in a steep performance penalty. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, examines the roles of the CPU and GPU, and provides context on how this specific combo ranks against others in the database.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a predictable but pronounced scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 152 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 drops that average to 96 FPS, a reduction of 56 FPS or approximately 37%. The jump to 3840x2160 is even more severe, with the average falling to 51 FPS, which is a 66% decrease from the 1080p result. This steep curve strongly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 becomes the primary limiting component as pixel count rises, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus being stressed by the higher resolution workloads.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For Low settings, the frame rate drops from 278 FPS at 1080p to 176 FPS at 1440p and finally to 93 FPS at 4K. The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory: 196 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 66 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, starting at 100 FPS at 1080p and falling to 64 FPS at 1440p, then plummeting to 34 FPS at 4K. The consistent proportional drops across all presets suggest that the resolution scaling is primarily a function of the GPU's rendering throughput, not a sudden bottleneck introduced by the CPU.
At 1080p, the gap between Low and High settings is notable (278 FPS vs 152 FPS), but the CPU still manages to feed the GPU adequately. The data shows that the Core Ultra 5 245, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, is not the limiting factor at this resolution for most presets. However, at 4K, the frame rates across all settings are significantly compressed, with the spread between Low (93 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) being much wider than at 1080p. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is the sole bottleneck, and the CPU's headroom is largely unused.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Fortnite?
A: The highest average frame rate measured is 278 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with the Medium preset?
A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 66 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS. This is the only 4K preset with min/max data available.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 1440p?
A: Based on the frame rate scaling, the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 1440p. The average FPS for High settings drops from 152 at 1080p to 96 at 1440p, a 37% decrease, which is a larger proportional drop than what would be expected if the CPU were limiting performance.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields 278 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset yields 100 FPS. This represents a 178 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding on the graphics hardware.
Q: Does the combo maintain a 60 FPS average at any 4K setting?
A: Yes, the combo achieves a 66 FPS average at 4K with Medium settings. The High preset at 4K falls below 60 FPS with a 51 FPS average, and the Ultra preset drops to 34 FPS.
Q: How does this combo's performance at 1080p Ultra compare to its 1440p High performance?
A: The average frame rate is identical at 100 FPS for 1080p Ultra and 96 FPS for 1440p High. This suggests that the GPU is similarly stressed by both configurations, despite the resolution difference.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's benchmark scores show a strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, which is critical for Fortnite's game logic and physics calculations. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 32924 indicates substantial parallel processing capability, though Fortnite does not always scale perfectly with all 14 threads.
In the context of Fortnite, the CPU's role is to handle game world simulation, player positions, and input processing. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 278 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough draw calls to achieve very high frame rates. The processor's Passmark single-thread score of 4394 puts it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong per-core performance. However, the nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (which scores 49228 on average, a 0.5% difference) and the Intel Core i5-14600K (scoring 48618, a 0.8% difference), are very closely matched, suggesting this CPU is not a unique outlier in its class.
The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help reduce memory latency, which is beneficial for a fast-paced game like Fortnite. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s with dual-channel DDR5 support is adequate for the game's data streaming needs. The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not a significant bottleneck at 1440p or 4K, as the frame rates at those resolutions are much lower than at 1080p, pointing to GPU limitations. At 1080p High, the 152 FPS average shows the CPU can handle the workload, but pushing to 1080p Ultra (100 FPS) still leaves headroom, as the GPU is likely struggling with the increased visual fidelity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average at 278 FPS, followed by Medium at 196 FPS (with a min of 166 and max of 225), High at 152 FPS, and Ultra at 100 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 178 FPS, demonstrating the significant impact of graphics settings on performance. The Medium preset at 1080p is notable for having min/max data, showing a 59 FPS range, which indicates some frame time variance but still a very smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS values are 176 for Low, 124 for Medium (min 106, max 143), 96 for High, and 64 for Ultra. The performance drop from 1080p is consistent, with the Low preset falling by 102 FPS and the Ultra preset falling by 36 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a min of 106 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset at 1440p is a solid option for players with high refresh rate monitors, as the 96 FPS average is close to the 100 FPS mark.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates are significantly lower. The Low preset averages 93 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset averages 66 FPS (min 56, max 76), which is the only 4K setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS. The High preset at 4K drops to 51 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 34 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable on Low or Medium settings, as the higher presets result in sub-60 FPS averages. The min FPS of 56 at 4K Medium indicates that occasional dips below 60 FPS are possible, which could be noticeable on a 60 Hz display.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the primary driver of the frame rates observed in this data. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz, with 5888 shading units and 96 ROPs. The GPU's Passmark G3D score is 22214, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, which is a mid-range position. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (scoring 17083, a 0.7% difference), show that the RTX 3070 is competitive but not dominant in its class.
In Fortnite, the GPU's role is to render the game's vibrant, stylized graphics, which can be demanding at high resolutions and settings. The data clearly shows that the RTX 3070 struggles at 4K with high and ultra presets, as the memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM capacity become limiting factors. The 34 FPS average at 4K Ultra indicates that the GPU is heavily overloaded, likely spilling over its memory capacity and causing significant frame drops. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck at 4K with high-resolution textures, as Fortnite's Ultra preset can require more than 8 GB of video memory.
At 1080p, the RTX 3070 is more capable, delivering 278 FPS on Low settings, which is well above the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. The GPU's performance at 1440p is also strong, with a 96 FPS average on High settings, making it suitable for 1440p gaming without compromising too much on visual quality. The GPU's FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS is sufficient for the game's shader complexity, but the 4K results show that raw compute power is not the only factor; memory bandwidth and capacity play a crucial role at higher resolutions. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, it becomes a limiting factor, as evidenced by the steep FPS drop.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For players with a 1080p monitor, the High preset at 152 FPS is the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it provides a smooth experience on most high refresh rate displays. The Medium preset at 196 FPS is also excellent for competitive play, offering higher frame rates with a slight reduction in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 100 FPS is playable but may not be worth the performance cost for the marginal visual improvement.
At 1440p, the High preset at 96 FPS is the recommended choice for a balance of quality and smoothness, as it stays close to the 100 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 124 FPS is better for players who prioritize frame rate, offering a significant boost over High with a modest visual trade-off. The Ultra preset at 64 FPS is still above 60 FPS but may feel less fluid on a 144 Hz monitor, so it is only recommended for players who value visual fidelity over frame rate.
At 4K, the options are more constrained. The Medium preset at 66 FPS is the only setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a playable 4K experience. The Low preset at 93 FPS is also viable and provides a more comfortable frame rate margin, but with significantly reduced visual quality. The High and Ultra presets at 4K should be avoided, as the 51 FPS and 34 FPS averages, respectively, are below the threshold for smooth gameplay. For most players, the data suggests that 1440p High or 1080p Ultra offers the best overall experience, balancing visual fidelity with frame rate.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 1115 out of 2740 tested combos in Fortnite, placing it in the 59th percentile of all tested systems. This rank indicates that while the combo is above average, it is not among the top performers. The CPU's percentile of 90 is significantly higher than the GPU's percentile of 61, which suggests that the GPU is the weaker component in this pairing relative to the broader hardware landscape. The combo's overall rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's mid-range position.
The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Core i5-14600K, have average benchmark scores within 1% of the Core Ultra 5 245, indicating that the CPU is not a differentiator in this combo. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, also have very similar average scores, with deltas of less than 1.5%. This suggests that the combo's performance in Fortnite is largely determined by the GPU, and swapping the CPU for a close rival would not significantly change the frame rates, while swapping the GPU for a close rival would also have a minimal impact.
The rank of 1115 out of 2740 places this combo in the upper-middle tier of tested systems. The measured FPS data supports this positioning, as the combo can handle 1080p and 1440p Gaming very well but struggles at 4K with high settings. For a system built around a 14-core CPU and an 8 GB GPU, this performance is expected, and the data confirms that the combo is well-suited for mainstream gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but not for enthusiasts seeking maximum 4K performance.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Fortnite
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 176.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 124.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 278.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 196.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 100.0 |
Fortnite with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs
See how Fortnite performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fortnite with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Fortnite performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.