Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title where the hardware itself is the star, and the data for the Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 shows a combination that is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, but shifts to a more balanced workload at 1080p. The measured frame rates reveal a system that is exceptionally fast across the board, though the scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K provides a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies. The results indicate that this pairing is capable of delivering high refresh rate gameplay at 1440p and solid 4K performance, but the specific settings you choose will dramatically alter the experience.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 235 FPS at 1920x1080 to 148 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 87 FPS, and then further down to 78 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 67% decrease in average FPS from 1080p to 4K, meaning the RTX 4080 is doing the heavy lifting, and its workload increases exponentially with pixel count. The data shows that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but as the resolution climbs, the GPU's rendering capabilities become the sole limiting factor.

This trend is even more pronounced at the Low preset. The jump from 429 FPS at 1080p to 297 FPS at 1440p is a 132 FPS drop, and then it falls to 155 FPS at 4K. The fact that the 4K Low result (155 FPS) is still higher than the 4K High result (78 FPS) confirms that the GPU is the primary constraint; reducing the graphical load directly translates to higher frame rates. Conversely, the scaling between Medium and Ultra settings at each resolution shows a similar pattern, with the gap between 1080p and 4K being roughly 220-240 FPS for Medium and 150 FPS for Ultra, which reinforces that resolution is the dominant factor in performance.

The frame time data further illustrates this point. At Medium settings, the difference between the minimum and maximum FPS is 100 FPS at 1080p, 63 FPS at 1440p, and 33 FPS at 4K. This tightening of the frame rate range at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU is becoming more consistently saturated, reducing the variance that can come from CPU-driven frame spikes. The data strongly indicates that this combo is not CPU-limited at 1440p or 4K, as the frame rates scale almost perfectly with the pixel count, leaving the RTX 4080 as the definitive performance ceiling.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F brings substantial processing power to this pairing, with 20 cores and 28 threads operating at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The benchmark results for this CPU show it is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 91st percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and single-core score of 4958 demonstrate a strong balance between heavy multi-threaded workloads and lighter, latency-sensitive tasks. This is relevant for a simulation game, which often has significant background simulation logic that can benefit from many cores.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is to handle the game's logic, physics calculations, and the management of all the individual components you are assembling. The data suggests that the 14700F is more than adequate for this task, as the frame rates at 1080p Low (429 FPS) are extraordinarily high, indicating that the CPU can process frames far faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions. The fact that the 1080p High result (235 FPS) is also very high shows that even with increased graphical demands, the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution.

However, the data also reveals that the CPU's influence wanes as resolution increases. Comparing the 4K Low (155 FPS) to the 1080p Low (429 FPS) shows a 274 FPS difference, which is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load. The CPU's workload per frame does not change significantly with resolution, so its performance ceiling is effectively hidden when the GPU is forced to render four times the pixels. The nearest rivals to the 14700F, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, have a negligible average score delta of 0.6%, which suggests that swapping to a similarly priced competitor would yield almost identical results in this game, further confirming that the CPU is not the limiting component in most scenarios tested.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this configuration, and its specifications explain the performance scaling seen in the data. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, it offers a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, which is crucial for feeding the GPU's 9728 shading units at high resolutions. Its boost clock of 2505 MHz and FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS position it as a high-end card from the Ada Lovelace architecture, and its benchmark scores reflect this, with a percentile rank of 86 versus all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 54247. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 is a strong indicator of its raw rendering capability.

The GPU's role in this game is clearly the primary driver of frame rate. The measured FPS data shows a direct correlation between the graphical preset and performance, with the Low preset at 4K (155 FPS) achieving more than double the frame rate of the Ultra preset at 4K (74 FPS). This is a clear sign that the RTX 4080 is being fully utilized, and its performance is directly tied to the workload. The 16 GB of VRAM is also a relevant factor; in a game about building PCs, it is plausible that high-resolution textures and detailed component models could consume significant memory, and having 16 GB provides ample headroom to avoid any VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in at 4K Ultra settings.

The comparison with its nearest rivals shows that the RTX 4080 is positioned exactly where you would expect. The RTX 4080 SUPER is only 0.1% faster on average, which is within the margin of error, meaning the two cards are effectively identical in performance. The data shows that the RTX 4080 is a very consistent performer, and the 4K Ultra result of 74 FPS is respectable for a demanding simulation, but it falls short of the 141 FPS achieved at 1440p Ultra. This suggests that for a smooth 4K experience, you will likely need to use High settings to get closer to the 78 FPS average, which is playable but not optimal for high refresh rate monitors.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 220th out of 3723 combos for Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 6% of all tested configurations, which is an excellent result and indicates that this is a high-performing combination for this game. The rank of 220 is a strong endorsement of the balance between the CPU and GPU, as it outperforms the vast majority of other pairings, which likely includes many with weaker CPUs or GPUs.

The high rank is not surprising given the individual performance of the components. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggest that both are well above average, and when combined, they produce a system that excels in this simulation. The fact that it ranks 220th out of 3723 means that there are only 219 other combos that perform better, which likely consist of top-tier components like the RTX 4090 or possibly newer generation hardware. This combo is clearly in the enthusiast tier, and the data suggests that for Pc Building Simulator, it is a pairing that will not leave you wanting for performance.

It is also notable that the combo rank is relatively high compared to what you might expect from the individual component percentiles. This is because the game seems to respond well to strong single-threaded performance, which the 14700F provides, and also to high GPU throughput, which the RTX 4080 delivers. The result is a system that is well-balanced for this specific title, avoiding the pitfalls of a severe bottleneck in either direction. The rank of 220 out of 3723 is a definitive statement that this is a top-tier combination for players who want high frame rates in Pc Building Simulator.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 429 FPS, which is extraordinarily high and indicates that the CPU is capable of pushing frames far beyond what most monitors can display. The Medium preset averages 333 FPS, with a minimum of 283 FPS and a maximum of 383 FPS, showing a very consistent experience. High settings average 235 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 224 FPS, ensuring that any 1080p monitor with a high refresh rate will be fully utilized.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high but start to show the GPU's workload. The Low preset averages 297 FPS, which is still incredibly fast for 1440p. Medium settings average 210 FPS, with a minimum of 179 FPS and a maximum of 242 FPS, providing a smooth experience for high refresh rate gaming. High settings average 148 FPS, which is ideal for a 144Hz monitor, and Ultra settings average 141 FPS, which is still very playable and close to the High preset's performance. The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, as even Ultra settings are well above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The Low preset averages 155 FPS, which is still excellent for 4K and shows the raw power of the RTX 4080. Medium settings average 110 FPS, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS, which is a solid 4K experience. High settings drop to an average of 78 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Ultra settings average 74 FPS, which is the lowest result in the entire dataset, but it is still above 60 FPS, meaning the game is playable at maximum settings on a 60Hz 4K display, though with little headroom for frame drops. The data clearly shows that for 4K, you will need to choose between High and Medium settings to maintain a consistently smooth frame rate.

Settings Recommendations

For players using a 4K display, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The average of 110 FPS at 4K Medium is a significant improvement over the 78 FPS at High, and the frame rate range of 93 to 126 FPS indicates a more stable experience than the High or Ultra presets, which have no reported minimum or maximum values, suggesting potential for more variance. The jump from Medium to High costs you 32 FPS on average, which is a substantial drop for what is likely a marginal visual improvement in a simulation game where you are mostly looking at menus and PC cases.

At 1440p, the High preset is the clear recommendation, as it delivers an average of 148 FPS, which is perfect for a 144Hz monitor. The Ultra preset at 141 FPS is nearly identical, so if you have a G-Sync or FreeSync display, you can opt for Ultra without any noticeable difference. However, if you are sensitive to frame rate drops, the High preset provides a slightly higher average and likely a more consistent frame time. The Medium preset at 210 FPS is overkill for most displays, but it shows that the hardware has plenty of headroom.

For 1080p users, the choice is less critical because all presets are exceptionally fast. The Ultra preset at 224 FPS is the best option for maximizing visual quality, as it still provides a frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most 1080p monitors. The High preset at 235 FPS is also a great choice, and the difference between High and Ultra is only 11 FPS, so you should not hesitate to use Ultra if you want the best-looking components. The Low and Medium presets are only relevant if you are trying to achieve maximum frame rates for competitive play, but in a simulation game, the visual fidelity of Ultra is likely more valuable than the extra 200 FPS.