Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and configuring PCs, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 reveals a system that is overwhelmingly powerful for this workload, with performance scaling that highlights the CPU’s dominance at lower resolutions and the GPU’s capabilities at 4K. The measured frame rates show that this combo sits in the 95th percentile of all tested configurations, and the analysis below breaks down exactly how each component contributes to the experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested hardware combinations in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 183rd out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 5% of all configurations measured for this game.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 9 9900X3D than its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s average benchmark score is 54,762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093) but 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053). The delta is minimal, indicating near-identical raw compute performance among these top-tier CPUs.

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate recorded for this combo, and at what settings?

A: The highest average FPS is 468, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is nearly double the next highest result, which is 333 FPS at the same resolution with Medium settings.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 have more or less raw GPU compute power than its closest competitor?

A: The RTX 4080’s average benchmark score is 54,247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) but 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828). The scores are effectively tied, showing that the 4080 remains a formidable GPU even against its direct successor.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 210 FPS, with a minimum of 179 FPS and a maximum of 242 FPS. This indicates a stable frame delivery with a 63 FPS spread between the low and high marks.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 6,739 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 47,737 in multi-core. The multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times higher, which reflects the scaling across its 12 cores and 24 threads.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, featuring 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, which is more than sufficient for the modest texture and geometry demands of a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator.

The GPU’s boost clock of 2505 MHz and base clock of 2205 MHz are high, but the data shows that the RTX 4080 is not the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 468 FPS, which is so high that the CPU is almost certainly limiting the frame rate. The GPU’s role becomes more apparent at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 74, which indicates that the GPU is now being pushed harder, though it still maintains a playable frame rate. The RTX 4080’s raw compute power, measured at 48.74 TFLOPS for FP32, ensures that even at 4K, the rendering workload is handled without dipping below 60 FPS on High settings (78 FPS average).

The GPU’s benchmark percentile of 86 places it in the top tier of all graphics cards, and its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is only 0.1% faster on average. This suggests that the 4080 is not leaving any meaningful performance on the table in this game. The data indicates that the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is more than adequate, as Pc Building Simulator is not a VRAM-heavy title, and the card’s 112 ROPs are capable of driving high pixel fill rates at 4K, evidenced by the 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear pattern of scaling as resolution increases, which is typical for a system where the CPU is very strong and the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at High settings drops from 235 to 148, a 37% reduction. This is a significant drop, but it is less pronounced than the drop from 1440p to 4K, where FPS falls from 148 to 78, a 47% reduction.

The scaling is even more dramatic at Low settings. At 1080p Low, the system hits 468 FPS, which drops to 297 FPS at 1440p Low (a 37% reduction) and then to 155 FPS at 4K Low (a 48% reduction from 1440p). This scaling suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiter, as the frame rates are astronomically high and the GPU has plenty of headroom. As resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows, and the frame rate begins to reflect the GPU’s rendering capabilities more closely.

The medium settings results provide the most complete picture, as they include minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 333 FPS with a minimum of 283 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 210 FPS with a minimum of 179 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 110 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS. The frame rate consistency also degrades with resolution, as the spread between min and max FPS widens from 100 FPS at 1080p to 63 FPS at 1440p and 33 FPS at 4K, indicating that the GPU is working harder and frame times are becoming less uniform.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 183 out of 3,723 tested combinations places it in the 95th percentile, which is an exceptional result. This ranking is likely driven by the CPU’s massive multi-threaded performance, as the Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s 12 cores and 24 threads are overkill for a game that is not heavily threaded. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 54,762 is within 1% of its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which shows that the CPU is at the very top of its class.

The GPU’s rank of 86th percentile is also strong, but it is slightly lower than the CPU’s percentile of 91. This suggests that the GPU, while powerful, is not as exceptional relative to its peers as the CPU is. However, the combination of a top-10% CPU and a top-15% GPU results in a system that is in the top 5% of all combos tested for this game.

The ranking is particularly impressive because Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that may not fully utilize the hardware’s capabilities. The data shows that the system is capable of frame rates well beyond what any display can show, especially at 1080p, which means that the combo is not being pushed to its limits. The high rank reflects the raw power of both components, even if the game itself does not require such extreme performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 468 FPS on Low, 333 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 283 and maximum of 383), 235 FPS on High, and 224 FPS on Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 11 FPS, which is surprisingly small and suggests that the game’s Ultra preset does not add a significant rendering load at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the results are 297 FPS on Low, 210 FPS on Medium (minimum 179, maximum 242), 148 FPS on High, and 141 FPS on Ultra. Again, the gap between High and Ultra is minimal at 7 FPS, but the drop from Medium to High is substantial at 62 FPS, indicating that the High preset introduces more demanding effects.

At 3840x2160, the results are 155 FPS on Low, 110 FPS on Medium (minimum 93, maximum 126), 78 FPS on High, and 74 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Medium to High is consistent, with each step reducing FPS by roughly 30-45%. The Ultra preset at 4K is only 4 FPS slower than High, which again shows that the Ultra settings are not dramatically more demanding than High.

The minimum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings, and they show that the system never drops below 283 FPS at 1080p, 179 FPS at 1440p, or 93 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the frame pacing is excellent, with no stutters or drops that would be noticeable to the user. The maximum FPS values show that the system can burst well above the average, reaching 383 FPS at 1080p and 242 FPS at 1440p.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the best experience is achieved by prioritizing a high refresh rate display. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset delivers 224 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors. For a 144Hz or 165Hz display, the High preset at 1440p (148 FPS) is the sweet spot, as it provides a smooth experience without sacrificing visual quality. The Ultra preset at 1440p (141 FPS) is also viable, but the 7 FPS difference is unlikely to be noticeable.

For 4K gaming, the High preset (78 FPS) is the best option, as it stays above 60 FPS and provides a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. The Medium preset (110 FPS) is a better choice for those with a 120Hz 4K display, as it offers a significant boost in frame rate while still looking decent. The Ultra preset (74 FPS) is playable but does not offer enough of a visual improvement over High to justify the 4 FPS loss.

The Low preset is not recommended for any resolution, as it produces frame rates that are far beyond what is necessary (468 FPS at 1080p) and likely sacrifices visual quality that would enhance the simulation experience. The Medium preset is a solid choice for users with high-refresh-rate displays, offering 333 FPS at 1080p and 210 FPS at 1440p, which are excellent for competitive or fast-paced scenarios.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) built on a 4 nm process. Its base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz are high, and the 128 MB of L3 cache is substantial. The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional: it achieves 47,737 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,739 in single-core, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 13,795.

The data suggests that the CPU is the primary performance driver in Pc Building Simulator at lower resolutions. The fact that the system can hit 468 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU with frames faster than the GPU can render them. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (1,269 in 3DMark single-thread) is critical for simulation games, which often rely on a single main thread for game logic.

The CPU’s 12 cores are more than enough for this game, and the multi-threaded scores (20,049 in Cinebench R20, 22,884 in Geekbench multi-core) show that the processor is not a bottleneck even when the game does use multiple threads. The CPU’s percentile of 91 versus all CPUs indicates that it is in the top 9% of all processors, and its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is only 0.6% faster, while the Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.3% slower, meaning that the 9900X3D is effectively tied with the best that Intel has to offer in this synthetic measure.

In the context of this game, the CPU’s massive L3 cache (128 MB) may also play a role in reducing memory latency, which is beneficial for simulation titles that access large datasets. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth of the dual-channel DDR5 setup is adequate, though not the highest available. Overall, the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution, and the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K is entirely attributable to the GPU’s increasing workload.