Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, shows remarkably high performance on the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination. The measured frames per second (FPS) data indicates that this hardware pairing is capable of delivering smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay even at the most demanding settings. The data points across three resolutions and four quality presets provide a clear picture of a system that is consistently over-performing relative to the needs of the simulation genre.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data reveals a clear hierarchy in performance across the four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from a staggering 468 on Low to 223 on Ultra. The Medium preset delivers 331 FPS, while High provides 234 FPS. For players with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, the High preset is the optimal choice, as its 234 FPS average is more than sufficient to saturate a 240Hz display while offering significantly better visual fidelity than Medium or Low.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptional. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 141 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz monitors. The High preset yields 148 FPS, a marginal increase that does not justify the loss in visual quality. The Medium preset at 209 FPS and Low at 295 FPS are excessively high for most display capabilities, making Ultra the best experience at this resolution. The data shows a clear point of diminishing returns, where the jump from High to Ultra costs only 7 FPS on average, making Ultra the recommended preset for 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits, though it remains highly capable. The Ultra preset delivers 73 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate 4K monitors. The High preset provides 77 FPS, a negligible difference. However, the Medium preset jumps to 109 FPS, offering a much smoother experience. Given that the visual difference between High and Medium in a simulation game is often subtle, the Medium preset at 4K presents the best balance, providing a 41.8% improvement over High in average FPS. The Low preset at 154 FPS is unnecessarily high for 4K, sacrificing too much visual quality for performance that exceeds most display refresh rates.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the primary driver of the high frame rates in this simulation. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides a substantial 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is ample for Pc Building Simulator, which is not a texture-heavy title compared to modern AAA games. The GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 80 RT cores are far beyond the requirements of a simulation game from 2019, which explains why the performance is so high even at 4K.

The GPU’s clock speeds, with a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2550 MHz, contribute to its raw throughput. Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 34245, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, scores 54247 on the average benchmark, making the SUPER variant a mere 0.1% faster. This indicates that the RTX 4080 SUPER is at the top of its class, with the data suggesting that the GPU is rarely the bottleneck in this game, except at the highest resolution and settings.

The performance scaling with settings is telling. At 1440p, dropping from Ultra to Medium increases average FPS from 141 to 209, a 48.2% gain. This indicates that the GPU is sensitive to the rendering load, but even at its most stressed state (4K Ultra), it maintains a respectable 73 FPS. The GPU’s role here is to provide headroom; it is so powerful that the game’s engine or the CPU may become the limiting factor at lower resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the massive 468 FPS figure at 1080p Low.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D provides the computational backbone for this system. With 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, it offers substantial multi-threaded performance. Its 128 MB of L3 cache is a significant asset for simulation games, which often involve complex data structures and physics calculations. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks, which are common in game logic, are handled with minimal latency.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 47737 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6739 in single-core. Its average benchmark score of 54762 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, has an average score of 55093, making the Ryzen chip 0.6% slower. This tight competition shows that the 9900X3D is a top-tier processor, but its performance in Pc Building Simulator is likely overkill.

The CPU’s role in this game becomes apparent when analyzing FPS at low settings. At 1080p Low, the system hits 468 FPS, a figure that is more reflective of CPU and engine limits than GPU capability. The data suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to sustain incredibly high frame rates. However, the game’s engine appears to have a soft cap around this level, as the 4K Low setting still achieves 154 FPS. This indicates that while the CPU is exceptionally strong, the game’s simulation logic may not scale perfectly with the 12 cores, but its high single-thread performance prevents it from being a bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 146th out of 3002 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 4.9% of all systems tested, which is a strong showing for a hardware pairing that is not even the absolute fastest available. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this setup; it has enough CPU power to handle complex simulation logic and enough GPU power to render high resolutions.

The high rank is corroborated by the measured FPS data. The system is capable of breaking 200 FPS at 1080p on Ultra settings, which puts it in the upper echelon of performance. The fact that it can maintain over 140 FPS at 1440p Ultra and over 70 FPS at 4K Ultra shows that this combo is not just a 1080p performer; it is a versatile system that can adapt to various display configurations. The rank of 146 suggests that there are 145 combinations that perform better, but these likely involve newer or more specialized hardware. For a simulation game, this rank indicates that users can expect a flawless experience with no perceivable stutter or lag.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reveals the system’s bottleneck characteristics. Starting at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 223. Moving to 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 141, a 36.8% decrease. Continuing to 4K Ultra, the average falls to 73, another 48.2% decrease from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

However, the data at Low settings tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the average is 468 FPS. Dropping to 1440p Low yields 295 FPS, a 37.0% decrease. Moving to 4K Low results in 154 FPS, a 47.8% decrease. The percentage drops are consistent across settings, suggesting that the GPU is the primary scaling factor. The fact that the 4K Low score of 154 FPS is still higher than the 1440p Ultra score of 141 FPS indicates that the GPU’s pixel throughput is the main constraint at higher resolutions, not the CPU.

The limiting component is clearly the GPU at 4K, as evidenced by the 73 FPS on Ultra. At 1080p, the CPU and game engine become more relevant, as the 468 FPS Low result is likely near the engine’s maximum frame rate. The data shows that the CPU has enough headroom to push beyond 400 FPS in this game, but the GPU’s rendering workload at 4K Ultra brings the system to a more moderate, yet still playable, performance level.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Pc Building Simulator at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes, it can. The measured data shows an average of 73 FPS at 3840x2160 on Ultra settings, which is a smooth and playable frame rate for a simulation game.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 is recommended, as it achieves an average of 141 FPS, which is just below the 144Hz refresh rate, providing a near-perfect match for the display’s capabilities.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the standard RTX 4080?

A: The benchmark data shows the RTX 4080 SUPER has an average score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247. This makes the SUPER version 0.1% faster, indicating a negligible performance difference.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 9900X3D a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER in this game?

A: No, it is not. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 468 FPS, showing that the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond typical display refresh rates. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and high single-thread performance prevent it from being a limiting factor.

Q: What is the expected FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured data indicates an average of 234 FPS at 1920x1080 on High settings, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate 1080p monitor.

Q: Does the game utilize the CPU’s 12 cores effectively?

A: While the game sees high performance, the FPS at Low settings (468 at 1080p) suggests the engine may have a frame rate cap. The CPU’s 24 threads provide ample headroom, but the game likely relies more on single-thread performance, which the 9900X3D excels at with a 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination, as provided by the data.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 77 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 154 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 109 | 93 | 126 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 73 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 148 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 295 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 209 | 178 | 240 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 141 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 234 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 468 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 331 | 282 | 381 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 223 | — | — |

The data shows a consistent pattern: the Medium preset provides a substantial boost over High and Ultra, with the minimum FPS figures (93 at 4K, 178 at 1440p, 282 at 1080p) ensuring that even the most complex simulation scenarios will not cause stutters. The maximum FPS values for Medium settings (126 at 4K, 240 at 1440p, 381 at 1080p) demonstrate the system’s ability to burst to very high frame rates when the simulation load is light. This granular data confirms that the system is well-balanced, with no single component creating a significant performance bottleneck across the tested configurations.