Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator presents an unusual hardware challenge. The game is a simulation about constructing PCs, yet the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Intel Arc B370 combo produces surprisingly low frame rates, ranking 2761st out of 3002 tested combos. The data suggests a significant bottleneck, and the benchmark results reveal a system that struggles to maintain playable performance at higher resolutions and settings, despite the CPU's strong synthetic scores.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a high-end desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This CPU is a powerhouse in synthetic benchmarks, scoring 19,088 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,987 in single-core tests. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 35,686 and single-thread score of 4,190 place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35,909. The data shows it is closely matched with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, which scores 35,802 (0.3% slower), and the Intel Core 7 250H, which scores 35,728 (0.5% slower).

Given the CPU's capability, one would expect it to handle a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator with ease. The game's genre, Simulation, often relies on single-thread performance for game logic and physics. The 7700X's single-core score of 1,987 in Cinebench R23 and 2,289 in Geekbench single-core indicates strong per-thread performance. However, the measured FPS in-game tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 113 FPS, which is decent. But at 1080p High, this drops to 56 FPS, suggesting that the CPU is not the primary limiter at lower settings.

The benchmarks reveal that the 7700X's multi-threaded performance is excellent, but this game may not utilize all 16 threads effectively. The 3DMark scores show a scaling pattern: 2,112 for 2 threads, 4,074 for 4 threads, 7,057 for 8 threads, and 8,859 for 16 threads. This indicates diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is typical for many games. For Pc Building Simulator, the data implies that the CPU's high clock speed (5.40 GHz boost) should be sufficient for the game's logic, but the actual frame rates suggest otherwise. The bottleneck appears to lie elsewhere, likely with the GPU, as the CPU's synthetic performance is far above what would be needed for 19 FPS at 4K Ultra.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process. It has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation pipelines. Its boost clock is 2,400 MHz, and it has 10 ray tracing cores. Notably, the GPU's memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. This is a critical detail, as the memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," which can severely limit performance in graphics-intensive scenarios.

The GPU's synthetic benchmark score is a mere 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (scoring 1,186, 0.2% faster) and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (scoring 1,190, 0.5% faster). This performance level is comparable to GPUs from over a decade ago, which explains the low frame rates observed. The Arc B370's FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS, which is modest, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s is also limited.

The GPU's TDP is just 25 W, and it is classified as an IGP with no power connectors. This underscores its role as a basic integrated solution, not a dedicated gaming GPU. The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this combo. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 113 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 54 FPS. This pattern, where lowering settings significantly improves performance, points directly to the GPU being the limiting factor. The system-shared memory means that the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which can cause stuttering and reduced performance, especially at higher resolutions where more data needs to be processed.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data clearly illustrates the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 113 FPS. When moving to 1440p Low, the FPS drops to 71, a 37% reduction. At 4K Low, it falls further to 37 FPS, a 67% reduction from 1080p. This dramatic drop with increasing resolution is a classic sign of a GPU-limited system. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain relatively stable across resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not scale with resolution.

At High settings, the pattern is similar: 56 FPS at 1080p, 36 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K. The relative drops are consistent, confirming that the GPU is struggling to render frames at higher pixel counts. The data shows that the Arc B370, with its system-shared memory and limited processing power, cannot keep up with the demands of 4K rendering. The texture rate of 96 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 48 GPixel/s are simply insufficient for modern game resolutions.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings shows a drop from 80 FPS to 50 FPS (a 37.5% reduction), while from 1440p to 4K Medium, it drops from 50 FPS to 26 FPS (a 48% reduction). This non-linear scaling further emphasizes the GPU's limitations. At 4K, the system is clearly overwhelmed, with the 4K Ultra setting producing just 18 FPS. The data suggests that for this game, the GPU is the sole limiting factor, and the CPU's high performance is largely irrelevant to the final frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across all settings. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low averages 113 FPS, Medium averages 80 FPS (with a minimum of 68 and maximum of 92), High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. These numbers show that the system is playable at 1080p, especially at Low and Medium settings, but the drop from Medium to High is substantial (30 FPS), indicating a significant performance cost for higher visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the performance degrades further. Low averages 71 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS (with a minimum of 43 and maximum of 58), High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is borderline playable at Low and Medium settings, but High and Ultra settings result in sub-60 FPS experiences, which may be noticeable in a simulation game.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles severely. Low averages 37 FPS, Medium averages 26 FPS (with a minimum of 22 and maximum of 30), High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. None of these settings provide a smooth experience, and even Low settings at 4K fail to reach 40 FPS. The data reveals a clear hierarchy: the GPU is only capable of delivering acceptable performance at 1080p, and even then, only at lower settings. The lack of min/max FPS data for many entries suggests potential inconsistency, but the average values are consistently low at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo ranks 2761st out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the bottom 8% of all combinations tested, which is a poor showing. The rank is heavily influenced by the GPU's weak performance, as the CPU is well above average. The data suggests that pairing a top-tier CPU with a low-end integrated GPU results in a severely imbalanced system. The combo's percentile ranking among all combos is not directly stated, but the rank of 2761 out of 3002 indicates it is near the bottom.

In contrast, the CPU alone ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This disparity highlights the imbalance. The combo's performance is essentially dictated by the GPU, as the CPU's capabilities are never fully utilized. The data implies that for this game, users would need to either lower resolution and settings to achieve playable frame rates or consider a different GPU. The rank reflects the overall experience, which is subpar for a game that is not graphically demanding by modern standards.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X strong enough for Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, the CPU is more than capable. It scores 19,088 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,987 in single-core, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The bottleneck is the GPU, not the CPU.

Q: Why does the combo perform so poorly in 4K?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with system-shared memory. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is just 1,184, and it ranks in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. At 4K, the GPU cannot handle the pixel load, resulting in 19 FPS at High and 18 FPS at Ultra.

Q: What is the best setting for 1080p gaming with this combo?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 113 FPS, and at Medium, it achieves 80 FPS. For a balance of quality and performance, Medium is recommended, as it maintains a smooth frame rate with better visuals.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 0.2% slower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1,186) and 0.5% slower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190). It is a very low-end GPU.

Q: Does the CPU's 16 threads help in this game?

A: The 3DMark scores show scaling from 2,112 (2 threads) to 8,859 (16 threads), but the game's performance is GPU-limited. The CPU's multi-threading does not translate to higher FPS because the GPU is the bottleneck.

Q: Is this combo suitable for 1440p gaming?

A: At 1440p Low, the combo averages 71 FPS, and at Medium, 50 FPS. Higher settings drop below 40 FPS. It is playable at Low or Medium, but not ideal for High or Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience with this combo is at 1080p with Medium settings, which yields an average of 80 FPS. This provides a smooth and responsive experience for a simulation game. At 1080p Low, the 113 FPS is higher, but the visual quality is reduced. For users who prioritize frame rate, Low is viable, but Medium offers a better balance.

At 1440p, the data suggests that Medium settings (50 FPS) are the highest playable option, as High and Ultra drop to 36 and 34 FPS, respectively. For a consistent experience, Low at 1440p (71 FPS) might be preferable, but Medium is acceptable for those who want better visuals.

At 4K, the data shows that even Low settings (37 FPS) are not smooth, and higher settings are unplayable. Therefore, the recommendation is to avoid 4K with this combo entirely. The GPU's system-shared memory and low processing power make it unsuitable for 4K gaming. The best experience is clearly at 1080p Medium, which provides a playable frame rate without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.