Evolve

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909. It sits just 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35,802), 0.5% above the Intel Core 7 250H (35,728), 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (35,719), and 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35,670). This places the chip at the 85th percentile among all tested CPUs.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B370's performance tier based on its benchmark results?

A: The GPU scores 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, putting it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1,186, 0.2% faster), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190, 0.5% faster), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1,192, 0.7% faster), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1,168, 1.4% slower). The data indicates this is an entry-level integrated-class graphics solution.

Q: What frame rates does the combo achieve at 1080p across different settings?

A: At 1920x1080, the measured results show: Low setting averages 80 FPS, Medium averages 62 FPS (with a range of 53 to 72 FPS), High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. This demonstrates a clear step-down as graphical fidelity increases.

Q: How does resolution impact the average FPS at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 49 FPS at 1080p, to 33 FPS at 1440p, and further down to 19 FPS at 4K. This represents a 33% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 42% reduction from 1440p to 4K.

Q: Which resolution and setting combination provides the highest measured average frame rate?

A: The highest average frame rate in the measured data is 80 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next best is 62 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, followed by 54 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings.

Q: Where does this CPU-GPU combo rank among all tested combinations in this game?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2,639th out of 2,872 tested combos for Evolve. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, indicating a significant performance bottleneck.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is a 3 nm integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, operating with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation pipelines, along with 10 ray tracing cores. The GPU's theoretical pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and it delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 performance at 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1). The memory configuration is system-shared, meaning bandwidth is system-dependent rather than a fixed value.

The benchmark data reveals a stark reality: the Arc B370 scores just 1,184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low score, and the nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770. The performance differentials are narrow — within 1.4% — which suggests this GPU is not designed for demanding gaming workloads at high resolutions.

In Evolve, the GPU's limitations become apparent immediately. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 13 FPS, which is far below playable thresholds. Even at 4K Low, the average is just 31 FPS. The VRAM situation is unique here: the GPU uses system-shared memory, so there is no dedicated VRAM pool; the available memory and bandwidth depend entirely on the system's DDR5 configuration and the CPU's dual-channel memory bus, which provides a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This shared architecture means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory access, potentially creating additional latency and bandwidth pressure in memory-intensive scenes.

The data shows that the GPU scales poorly with resolution. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 80 FPS, which suggests the GPU can handle light loads. However, the jump from 1080p Low to 1440p Low drops performance by 33% to 54 FPS, and 4K Low drops another 43% to 31 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are severely constrained, making it a poor match for Evolve at higher resolutions. The 25 W TDP and integrated form factor (IGP slot width, no power connectors) further classify this as a low-power solution that prioritizes efficiency over gaming performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. It runs at a base clock of 4.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show the 7700X is a strong processor. It scores 19,088 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1,987 in single-core, 12,451 in Geekbench multicore and 2,289 in single-core, and 8,859 in 3DMark with 16 threads. The passmark multithread score is 35,686, with a single-thread score of 4,190. The chip ranks at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rivals being within 0.7% of its average score of 35,909.

In the context of Evolve, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with frames. The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for a 2015-era FPS title, and the high boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides strong single-thread performance, which is critical for game logic and physics. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 80 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound territory for this GPU. However, the CPU's performance potential is not fully utilized because the GPU is the bottleneck.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is notable because the GPU uses system-shared memory. This means the CPU's memory controller and the shared DDR5 bandwidth are critical for both CPU and GPU operations. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for the CPU, but the GPU has no dedicated cache and relies entirely on system memory, creating a potential point of contention.

Comparing the CPU to its rivals, the 7700X is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, Intel Core 7 250H, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, with deltas ranging from 0.3% to 0.7%. This means the CPU's performance is consistent with other mid-to-high-range processors, but the overall combo rank in Evolve (2,639th out of 2,872) is dragged down almost entirely by the GPU. The data implies that this CPU would be capable of much higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful GPU, as its compute resources are largely idle in this configuration.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of what settings are viable for this combo. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, which is smooth for a fast-paced FPS. The Medium preset drops to 62 FPS (range 53-72 FPS), which is still playable and likely represents the best balance of visual quality and performance. High averages 49 FPS, which is borderline for competitive play, while Ultra falls to 34 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS ideal for a shooter.

At 1440p, the situation worsens. Low averages 54 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 42 FPS (range 35-48 FPS), High to 33 FPS, and Ultra to 23 FPS. For 1440p, the Low preset is the only one that maintains a reasonable frame rate. At 4K, all settings are below playable standards: Low averages 31 FPS, Medium 24 FPS, High 19 FPS, and Ultra 13 FPS.

The data suggests that the best experience for this combo is at 1080p with the Medium preset. This yields an average of 62 FPS with a minimum of 53 FPS, which is within the range needed for a responsive FPS experience while providing better visual fidelity than Low. The jump from Low to Medium costs 18 FPS (a 22% reduction), but the visual improvement is typically significant in modern game engines. The jump from Medium to High costs another 13 FPS (a 21% reduction), which is a steeper price for diminishing returns.

For players who prioritize frame rate above all else, the 1080p Low preset at 80 FPS is the clear choice. For those who want a compromise, 1080p Medium at 62 FPS is recommended. At 1440p, the Low preset at 54 FPS is the only viable option. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this combo, as even the Low preset fails to reach 32 FPS. The data indicates that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with modest settings, and pushing higher resolutions or settings will result in a subpar experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2,639th out of 2,872 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the bottom 8.1% of all systems. The rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's extreme performance deficit. The CPU, by itself, ranks at the 85th percentile, but the GPU ranks at the 5th percentile, and the combo's overall position reflects the weaker of the two components.

The nearest GPU rivals to the Arc B370 are all legacy parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (0.2% faster), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (0.7% faster), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1.4% slower). These are all GPUs from a much older era, indicating that the Arc B370's performance is comparable to a mid-range GPU from roughly 2010. In a 2015 game like Evolve, this means the GPU is the primary limiting factor, and the CPU's capabilities are essentially wasted.

The combo rank of 2,639 out of 2,872 suggests that the vast majority of other tested combinations — likely those with discrete GPUs — outperform this setup. The data implies that this combination would be suitable for very light gaming or esports titles at low settings, but for a game like Evolve, it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong benchmark scores contrast sharply with the GPU's weak scores, creating a massive imbalance in the system.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). Here is the full breakdown:

At 1920x1080:

• Low: Average 80 FPS
• Medium: Average 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and maximum of 72 FPS
• High: Average 49 FPS
• Ultra: Average 34 FPS

At 2560x1440:

• Low: Average 54 FPS
• Medium: Average 42 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and maximum of 48 FPS
• High: Average 33 FPS
• Ultra: Average 23 FPS

At 3840x2160:

• Low: Average 31 FPS
• Medium: Average 24 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and maximum of 27 FPS
• High: Average 19 FPS
• Ultra: Average 13 FPS

The Medium settings are the only ones where min/max data is provided, showing a consistent spread of roughly 9-12 FPS between the minimum and maximum. This suggests some frame time variance, but not severe stuttering. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo can deliver a playable experience on Low and Medium, with High being borderline. At 1440p, only Low is playable, and at 4K, no setting achieves a playable average frame rate.

The step from Low to Medium costs approximately 18 FPS at 1080p (22% reduction), 12 FPS at 1440p (22% reduction), and 7 FPS at 4K (23% reduction). The step from Medium to High costs 13 FPS at 1080p, 9 FPS at 1440p, and 5 FPS at 4K. The step from High to Ultra costs 15 FPS at 1080p, 10 FPS at 1440p, and 6 FPS at 4K. These consistent percentage reductions (roughly 20-25% per step) suggest that the GPU's performance scales predictably with graphical load, and there are no unexpected bottlenecks or anomalies in the data.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear pattern of GPU dominance. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 80 at 1080p to 54 at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to 31 at 4K (a 43% reduction from 1440p). At Medium settings, the drop is from 62 to 42 (32% reduction) and then to 24 (43% reduction). At High settings, it's 49 to 33 (33% reduction) and then to 19 (42% reduction). At Ultra settings, it's 34 to 23 (32% reduction) and then to 13 (43% reduction).

The consistent percentage drops across all settings — approximately 32-33% from 1080p to 1440p, and approximately 42-43% from 1440p to 4K — indicate that the system is entirely GPU-bound. The number of pixels roughly doubles from 1080p (2.07 million) to 1440p (3.69 million), and doubles again to 4K (8.29 million). The observed FPS drops are slightly less than the pixel count increase, which is typical because some rendering costs (like CPU-side physics and draw calls) do not scale with resolution.

The data shows that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. The Arc B370's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s is modest, and at 4K, the sheer number of pixels overwhelms it. The system-shared memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent, also limits performance at higher resolutions because the GPU must access the system memory for textures and frame buffers. The CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between the CPU and GPU, and at 4K, the GPU's demand for memory bandwidth likely saturates the bus.

This scaling behavior suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar FPS at 1080p and 1440p (since the CPU's workload does not change much with resolution), but the data shows a consistent 33% drop. This confirms that the Intel Arc B370 is the primary constraint, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has ample headroom. The data implies that upgrading the GPU would provide near-linear FPS improvements at all resolutions, while upgrading the CPU would yield no tangible benefit in this game.