Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 127 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 76 | 101 | 130 |
| 1440p QHD | 98 | 103 | 137 | 176 |
| 1080p Full HD | 122 | 128 | 170 | 212 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a robust experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for this title, though the specific bottlenecks shift depending on the configuration. Benchmark results show that the combo ranks 186th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 5% of all systems evaluated. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to understand the behavior of this pairing.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 128 FPS at 1080p to 103 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 25 FPS, and then further to 76 FPS at 4K, a 27 FPS drop from the 1440p result. This scaling indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more stressed at higher resolutions, which is typical for a flight simulator with dense scenery rendering.
The Low preset shows the most dramatic scaling, with average FPS starting at a very high 212 FPS at 1080p, falling to 176 FPS at 1440p, and then to 130 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, suggesting that even at the lowest settings, the rendering workload at 4K is significant. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 36 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 46 FPS, showing that the performance cost of each resolution step increases as pixel count grows.
The Medium preset exhibits a similar slope, with 170 FPS at 1080p, 137 FPS at 1440p, and 101 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, starting at 122 FPS at 1080p and dropping to 98 FPS at 1440p before settling at 72 FPS at 4K. The relative performance drop from 1080p to 4K is approximately 41% for Ultra, compared to approximately 39% for High, indicating that the higher preset does not disproportionately amplify the resolution penalty. This behavior suggests that while the RTX 5080 is the primary limiter at 4K, the CPU still provides a solid foundation that prevents a catastrophic collapse in frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
Examining the measured rows, the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions, particularly for users who want a consistent frame rate without sacrificing visual fidelity. At 4K, Medium delivers 101 FPS average with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS, providing a smooth and stable experience that is well above the threshold for comfortable play. The High preset at 4K produces 76 FPS, which is still playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 72 FPS, which is borderline for users with high-refresh-rate displays.
For 1440p, the High preset at 103 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a significant visual upgrade over Medium's 137 FPS with only a 34 FPS penalty. The Ultra preset at 98 FPS is also viable, providing the highest fidelity while maintaining near-100 FPS performance. At 1080p, all presets are playable, with Low reaching 212 FPS and Ultra at 122 FPS; the Medium preset at 170 FPS is the recommended option for users who want to avoid the visual downgrades of Low while retaining high frame rates.
The data suggests that the Low preset is best reserved for extreme competitive scenarios or for users with 4K displays who prioritize frame rate above all else, as it achieves 130 FPS at 4K. However, for the majority of users, the Medium preset at 4K or High preset at 1440p provides the optimal balance of visual quality and performance, as these configurations maintain average FPS above 100 while keeping minimum FPS above 86.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the dominant component in this pairing for Microsoft Flight Simulator, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops at higher resolutions. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This substantial memory capacity is critical for a game like Microsoft Flight Simulator, which streams vast amounts of terrain and texture data. The high bandwidth ensures that the GPU can quickly access these assets, reducing the likelihood of stutter or texture pop-in during flight.
The GPU's clock speeds are a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, with memory running at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective). These high clocks contribute to the impressive raw performance, as reflected in the GPU's benchmark scores. The RTX 5080 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 and a Passmark G3D score of 36565, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. This performance is further validated by its nearest rivals, where it trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2% but leads the AMD Radeon 8060S by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.7% in average score.
The GPU's 10752 shading units and 84 RT cores are well-suited for the DirectX 12 Ultimate API, which the game supports. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, where the frame rate drops below 80 FPS on High and Ultra presets. This indicates that the RTX 5080's compute and memory resources are fully utilized at this resolution, and users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need to reduce settings or rely on upscaling technologies.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS is 76 at 3840x2160 with the High preset.
Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rival in the GPU benchmark?
A: The RTX 5080 trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2% in average benchmark score, but leads the AMD Radeon 8060S and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively.
Q: Which preset provides the highest minimum FPS at 1440p?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 shows a minimum FPS of 116, which is the only preset at that resolution with a recorded min FPS.
Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: The Low preset achieves 212 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 122 FPS, a difference of 90 FPS.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations?
A: The combo ranks 186th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 5% of all systems.
Q: Does the CPU show signs of bottlenecking at 1080p?
A: The data shows that the CPU maintains high frame rates at 1080p, with the Low preset exceeding 200 FPS, indicating that the i7-12700K is not a limiting factor at this resolution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K provides a strong foundation for this gaming system, with 12 cores and 20 threads operating at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture processor features a 25 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates robust multi-threaded performance, scoring 19784 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 12229 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R20 single-core scoring 1726 and Geekbench single-core at 2308.
The CPU's performance in this game is best understood by examining the 1080p results, where the GPU is less likely to be the bottleneck. At the Low preset, the system achieves 212 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that suggests the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. However, as settings increase to Medium, High, and Ultra, the frame rate drops to 170, 128, and 122 FPS respectively, indicating that the GPU's workload is increasing and the CPU is no longer the primary limiter. The CPU's 3DMark scores, such as 9276 for 16 threads and 9979 for max threads, show that it has sufficient headroom for this simulation's physics and AI computations.
The i7-12700K's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700KF, has an average score that is 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i5-13600T is 0.1% higher. These marginal differences confirm that the 12700K is well-positioned in the market, and its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that it is a capable processor for this title. The data shows that the CPU does not constrain the RTX 5080 in Microsoft Flight Simulator, as even the most demanding 4K Ultra settings produce 72 FPS, which is still a playable frame rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 212 FPS, the Medium preset averages 170 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 195 FPS, the High preset averages 128 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 122 FPS. These results show that at 1080p, the system is capable of exceeding 120 FPS on all presets, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 176 FPS, the Medium preset averages 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 157 FPS, the High preset averages 103 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 98 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in an average FPS drop of approximately 33 FPS across all presets, which is a consistent penalty that reflects the increased pixel count. The Medium preset's minimum FPS of 116 at this resolution ensures a smooth experience even during complex scenes.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 130 FPS, the Medium preset averages 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS, the High preset averages 76 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 72 FPS. The 4K results show a more pronounced separation between presets, with Low outperforming Ultra by 58 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum FPS of 86 is the lowest recorded value in the entire dataset, but it still remains above the 60 FPS threshold for playable performance. Overall, the data shows that the system is capable of delivering playable frame rates at all resolutions, with the Medium preset offering the most consistent performance across the board.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination holds a rank of 186 out of 3714 tested combos, which places it in the top 5% of all systems evaluated. This high ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing, where the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance complement the GPU's raw rendering power. The combo's ranking is particularly impressive given that the RTX 5080 is a high-end GPU, and the i7-12700K, while not the newest processor, provides sufficient performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck.
In the context of the GPU's nearest rivals, the RTX 5080's performance is closely matched by the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which is 2.2% faster in average benchmark score. However, the RTX 5080 outperforms the AMD Radeon 8060S and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively. This suggests that the combo's rank is largely driven by the GPU's capability, as the CPU's performance is within 0.4% of its nearest rivals.
The high rank of 186th out of 3714 indicates that users with this configuration will have a superior experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator compared to the vast majority of systems. The data shows that the combo is particularly well-suited for high-resolution gaming, as it maintains playable frame rates at 4K on all presets. For users seeking the best visual fidelity, the Ultra preset at 1440p provides 98 FPS, while those prioritizing frame rate can achieve 130 FPS at 4K on Low settings. This versatility underscores the combo's strong position in the benchmark database.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 130.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 101.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 176.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 103.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 212.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 170.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 128.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 122.0 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.