Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
122
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 73 97 125
1440p QHD 94 99 131 169
1080p Full HD 117 123 163 209

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 125
3840x2160 Medium 97
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Ultra 69
2560x1440 Low 169
2560x1440 Medium 131
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Ultra 94
1920x1080 Low 209
1920x1080 Medium 163
1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Ultra 117

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

# Microsoft Flight Simulator: Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

This combo ranks 251st out of 3714 tested configurations in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the top 7% of all measured systems. The pairing delivers a consistently playable experience across all resolutions and settings, but the data reveals a clear sweet spot: Medium settings at 1440p or 4K offer the best balance of smoothness and visual fidelity, with the GPU acting as the primary performance limiter at higher resolutions while the CPU holds its own at 1080p.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows show a clear pattern: High and Ultra settings at 4K dip below the 75 FPS threshold many flight sim enthusiasts prefer, while Medium settings maintain respectable frame rates with visible headroom. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 97 FPS with a minimum of 82 and maximum of 111, whereas High drops to 73 and Ultra to 69. The 28 FPS gap between Medium and High at 4K represents a significant visual upgrade cost that many users will find hard to justify given the diminishing returns in a flight simulator's cockpit and terrain rendering.

At 2560x1440, the story improves dramatically. High settings deliver 99 FPS average, Ultra reaches 94, and Medium hits 131 with a minimum of 112. The difference between Ultra and High at this resolution is only 5 FPS, making Ultra a viable choice for users with 1440p displays who prioritize maximum detail. However, Medium at 1440p offers the most headroom—31 FPS above High—which proves valuable in dense city areas or complex weather scenarios where frame rates can fluctuate.

For 1920x1080 users, the data suggests that High settings (123 FPS average) provide an excellent experience without the need to compromise. Ultra still manages 117 FPS, making it fully playable, while Medium's 163 FPS is excessive for most displays. The 1080p results indicate the CPU is beginning to limit performance, as the jump from 209 FPS at Low to 163 FPS at Medium shows a larger proportional drop than the corresponding GPU load increase would predict.

The optimal recommendation across all resolutions is Medium at 4K or High at 1440p. Medium at 4K provides 97 FPS with a narrow 29 FPS min-max spread, indicating consistent frame pacing. High at 1440p offers 99 FPS and avoids the occasional stutter that can occur at 4K Ultra's 69 FPS average. Users with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors should select High, as the 123 FPS average exceeds most 120Hz displays while leaving processing headroom for background tasks.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER brings 16 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration proves critical for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which streams vast terrain and texture data. The 4K Medium result (97 FPS) versus 1440p Medium (131 FPS) shows a 34 FPS drop, revealing the GPU's bandwidth and compute limits as resolution scales. The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 816.0 GTexel/s texture rate are taxed heavily by the simulator's detailed aircraft models and photogrammetry data.

At 4K Ultra, the RTX 4080 SUPER produces 69 FPS average, which is 28 FPS below the Medium preset at the same resolution. This 40% performance penalty for Ultra settings demonstrates that even a high-end GPU with 16 GB of VRAM cannot fully saturate the simulator's maximum detail level at 4K. The card's boost clock of 2550 MHz and base clock of 2295 MHz provide the raw compute necessary for the simulator's physics and rendering calculations, but the data suggests the memory subsystem becomes a bottleneck beyond Medium settings.

Comparing to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 0.1% lower than the standard RTX 4080 in average benchmark performance. In practical terms, this means the two cards perform nearly identically in synthetic tests, and the measured FPS differences in Flight Simulator will be negligible. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its position as a top-tier part, but the 4K Ultra result of 69 FPS indicates that even this hardware requires settings adjustments for a locked 60+ FPS experience.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is noteworthy for this game. Flight Simulator's high-resolution texture packs and detailed airport environments can approach this limit, but the measured data shows no catastrophic frame drops at 4K Ultra (69 FPS average), suggesting the memory allocation is sufficient. The 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, however, appears to be the limiting factor at 4K, as the 28 FPS drop from Medium to Ultra correlates with the increased texture streaming demands.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700K provides 12 cores and 20 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, making it a strong partner for the RTX 4080 SUPER in this simulator. Its 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache help maintain the frame pacing seen in the 1080p results. The 209 FPS Low and 163 FPS Medium results at 1080p indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions, but the 46 FPS drop between these presets suggests the game's simulation thread load increases significantly with settings.

Single-thread performance is crucial for flight simulators, and the i7-12700K delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1850.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2308. These results place it in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, and the 3.60 GHz base clock ensures consistent performance under sustained loads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and 2-thread score of 2065 show that the CPU's two fastest cores (likely the P-cores) handle the primary simulation thread efficiently.

Multi-threaded performance is equally important for the simulator's AI traffic, weather systems, and physics calculations. The i7-12700K achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19784 and a 3DMark max-thread score of 9979. These results indicate that the CPU can handle the background tasks without starving the main render thread. The 1080p High result of 123 FPS versus 1440p High's 99 FPS shows only a 24 FPS drop, suggesting the CPU becomes more of a factor as the GPU load decreases.

The nearest rival comparison shows the i7-12700K performing within 0.1-0.4% of the i7-12700KF, i5-13600T, and i7-13700T in average benchmark scores. This tight grouping means that in Flight Simulator, the i7-12700K's performance is representative of this CPU tier, and the 125W TDP with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provides adequate headroom for the simulator's variable loads.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration ranks 251st out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.8% of all systems tested in Microsoft Flight Simulator. The rank reflects the combination of the i7-12700K's 84th percentile CPU performance and the RTX 4080 SUPER's 86th percentile GPU performance. In practical terms, this means the system outperforms approximately 93% of tested configurations, making it a high-end setup that can handle the simulator's demands across most settings and resolutions.

The combo's ranking is consistent with its component-level performance. The CPU's 84th percentile rank and the GPU's 86th percentile rank suggest a balanced pairing, where neither component significantly bottlenecks the other. This balance is evident in the FPS data: at 1440p High, the system achieves 99 FPS, which is 73.3% of the 4K Low result (125 FPS) and 47.4% of the 1080p Low result (209 FPS). The scaling across resolutions is smooth, indicating that both components contribute to the overall performance.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system's 251st rank means it sits just outside the top 250 configurations. The 3714 total combos include systems with more powerful CPUs (like Core i9 and Ryzen 9 parts) and GPUs (like RTX 4090), which account for the higher ranks. However, the data shows that this combo delivers 4K Medium at 97 FPS, which is a very playable experience for most users, and 1440p Ultra at 94 FPS, which approaches the refresh rate limits of many mid-range monitors.

The rank also reflects the system's versatility. With 4K Low delivering 125 FPS and 1080p Low at 209 FPS, this combo can support high-refresh-rate displays at lower settings while maintaining playable frame rates at maximum detail. This flexibility is valuable for flight sim enthusiasts who may switch between cockpit view (GPU-heavy) and external views (CPU-heavy) during a single flight.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions, providing insight into which component limits performance at each setting. At Low settings, the progression from 1080p (209 FPS) to 1440p (169 FPS) to 4K (125 FPS) shows a 40% drop from 1080p to 4K. This relatively modest decline suggests the CPU and GPU are both contributing to performance at low settings, with the GPU becoming more dominant as resolution increases.

At Medium settings, the scaling is steeper: 163 FPS at 1080p, 131 FPS at 1440p, and 97 FPS at 4K. The 66 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K represents a 40.5% decrease, which is slightly larger than the Low preset's drop. This indicates that the GPU's workload increases proportionally with resolution at Medium settings, while the CPU maintains sufficient performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

High settings show a similar pattern: 123 FPS at 1080p, 99 FPS at 1440p, and 73 FPS at 4K. The 50 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is a 40.7% decrease, consistent with Medium. However, the absolute values suggest that at 4K High, the GPU is nearing its limit, as the 73 FPS average is only 11 FPS above the 4K Ultra result of 69 FPS. This narrowing gap between High and Ultra at 4K (4 FPS difference) versus 1080p (6 FPS difference) indicates the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K.

Ultra settings produce the most dramatic scaling: 117 FPS at 1080p, 94 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The 48 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is a 41% decrease, and the 4K Ultra result of 69 FPS is the lowest measured value across all settings and resolutions. This confirms that at 4K Ultra, the RTX 4080 SUPER is fully saturated, and the CPU's role is minimized. Conversely, at 1080p, the 117 FPS Ultra result versus 209 FPS Low shows a 92 FPS spread, indicating that the CPU can deliver high frame rates but the GPU load increases significantly with settings.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the 46 FPS drop from Low to Medium and the 86 FPS drop from Low to Ultra. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with only 56 FPS separating Low from Ultra (125 to 69). This resolution scaling analysis indicates that users targeting 1080p should prioritize CPU performance, while 4K users should focus on GPU settings optimization.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 deliver 97 FPS average with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 111 FPS. This provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, as High drops to 73 FPS and Ultra to 69 FPS, both of which are below the 75 FPS threshold many users prefer for smooth flight simulation.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p at maximum settings?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 Ultra settings, the combo achieves 94 FPS average. This is only 5 FPS below the High preset result of 99 FPS, making Ultra the recommended choice for 1440p users who want maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 4080 non-SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 0.1% lower than the standard RTX 4080 in average benchmark performance, indicating they are effectively identical in real-world gaming. In Flight Simulator, the measured FPS differences would be negligible.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary limiter. The data shows a 46 FPS drop from Low (209 FPS) to Medium (163 FPS), and a 92 FPS drop from Low to Ultra (117 FPS), indicating that the i7-12700K's performance ceiling is reached as settings increase, while the GPU still has headroom.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 4K Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows 97 FPS average at 3840x2160 Medium, with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 111 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with only a 29 FPS variance between minimum and maximum, indicating consistent frame pacing.

Q: How does this system rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 251st out of 3714 tested configurations, placing it in the top 6.8% of all systems tested in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This reflects the balanced high-end performance of the i7-12700K and RTX 4080 SUPER pairing.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700K

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2550 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 125.0
3840x2160 Medium 97.0
3840x2160 High 73.0
3840x2160 Ultra 69.0
2560x1440 Low 169.0
2560x1440 Medium 131.0
2560x1440 High 99.0
2560x1440 Ultra 94.0
1920x1080 Low 209.0
1920x1080 Medium 163.0
1920x1080 High 123.0
1920x1080 Ultra 117.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 4080 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700K + RTX 4080 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.