Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly capable experience in Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. The benchmark data shows this pairing is more than sufficient to push the game’s simple 2D side-scrolling visuals to very high frame rates, with the primary performance differentiator being the graphics settings rather than the resolution. The measured frame rates indicate that the GPU is the dominant factor in this configuration, though the CPU provides ample headroom for the game’s logical and physics calculations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically codenamed Vermeer. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This is a 7 nm part from TSMC, and its 32 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial. For a game like Inside, which is a puzzle platformer with relatively simple AI and physics, this processor is vastly overqualified. The benchmark data reflects this, as the CPU’s performance is not a limiting factor in any of the measured FPS results.

Looking at the CPU’s synthetic benchmarks, its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 23794, and its single-core score is 3359. These scores place the processor in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, according to the data. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, have average scores that are essentially identical, with delta percentages of 0 and -0.3%, respectively. This indicates that the 5800XT is competitive with modern mobile flagship chips, though its true strength lies in its consistent performance across all threads.

In the context of Inside, the game’s low CPU overhead means that even at 1080p with Low settings, where the frame rate jumps to 240 FPS, the processor is not taxed. The game does not rely on complex multi-threaded simulation, so the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides more than enough throughput. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures that any single-threaded tasks, such as game logic updates, are handled with minimal latency. The data suggests that this CPU’s role is to provide a stable foundation, ensuring that the GPU is never starved for data, which is confirmed by the fact that frame rates scale consistently with GPU load. The processor’s 105 W TDP and socket AM4 compatibility are standard for this performance class, but the benchmark results are what matter here: this is a high-end part that will not bottleneck a mid-range GPU like the Arc B570 in a light title such as Inside.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the graphics card in this pairing, built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, which is part of the Battlemage generation. It has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The GPU’s clock speeds are set at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, and its memory runs at 2375 MHz effective, which translates to 19 Gbps. With 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, the card is positioned as a capable 1080p and 1440p performer. Its FP32 performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS.

The GPU’s synthetic benchmark scores show a mixed picture. Its Passmark G3D score is 14195, which places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, has a delta percentage of -0.1%, meaning they are functionally equivalent in average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% ahead. This suggests the B570 sits in a specific performance tier, but for Inside, these raw numbers are less relevant.

In this game, the GPU’s role is to render the game’s atmospheric lighting, shadows, and particle effects. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between settings. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium to High to Ultra changes the average FPS from 240 to 192 to 120 to 114, respectively. This indicates that the GPU is handling the increased shading and texture work, but even at Ultra settings, it maintains a frame rate well above 60 FPS. The 10 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for Inside, as the game does not have high-resolution textures that would tax the memory buffer. The card’s bandwidth and clock speeds are more than adequate to push this 2D title, and the data shows that the bottleneck is purely the GPU’s fill rate and shader performance at higher settings, not its memory capacity.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 54 FPS at 4K with High settings and 52 FPS at Ultra settings. While these numbers are below 60 FPS, they are still playable, and dropping to Medium settings at 4K yields an average of 87 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this setup to maintain a 60 FPS minimum?

A: At 1440p, all settings produce an average FPS above 60, with the lowest being 82 FPS at Ultra. At 4K, only Low and Medium settings achieve average frame rates over 60 FPS (108 and 87 FPS, respectively).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, has a score of 29868, which is a delta of 0%, making them statistically tied. The Ryzen 7 8845HS is 0.3% slower, while the Ryzen 5 9600X is 0.6% faster.

Q: Is the GPU more powerful than the Intel Arc A750?

A: Based on average benchmark scores, they are essentially equal. The Arc B570 scores 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, which represents a delta of -0.1% for the B570, indicating it is marginally slower but within a negligible margin.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 120 FPS at 1080p with High settings. This is a significant drop from the 192 FPS at Medium settings, but it is still a very smooth experience.

Q: Does the game support high refresh rates at 1440p?

A: Yes. At 1440p, Low settings produce 172 FPS, and Medium settings produce 138 FPS. These high frame rates are well-suited for monitors with 144 Hz or 165 Hz refresh rates, provided the settings are not maxed out.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo achieves its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 240. This is a massive number, indicating that the GPU is not being pushed hard at all. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 192 FPS, with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS. High settings reduce the average further to 120 FPS. Ultra settings, which are the most demanding, produce an average of 114 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is small, only 6 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds minimal visual fidelity in this title for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings yield an average of 172 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings produce 138 FPS on average, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. High settings average 86 FPS, and Ultra settings average 82 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra remains small, at just 4 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware, as it delivers high frame rates across all presets while providing more visual detail than 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the GPU starts to show its limits. Low settings still produce an average of 108 FPS, which is impressive for 4K. Medium settings drop to 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. High settings average 54 FPS, and Ultra settings average 52 FPS. This is the only resolution where the average frame rate falls below 60 FPS for the higher settings. The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the gap between Low and Medium settings widens, but the gap between High and Ultra remains consistently small across all resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 240 at 1080p to 172 at 1440p, and then to 108 at 4K. This represents a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 55% drop from 1080p to 4K. This is a significant reduction, indicating that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are being taxed as the pixel count increases. The 10 GB VRAM is not the issue, as the game’s memory footprint is likely well below that, but the 160-bit bus and 380 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors at higher resolutions.

At Medium settings, the drop is similar: 192 FPS at 1080p, 138 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 87 FPS at 4K (a 55% drop from 1080p). The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and Medium settings suggests that the GPU is scaling linearly with pixel count. However, at High settings, the drops are steeper: 120 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 54 FPS at 4K (a 55% drop). This pattern indicates that the high-quality shaders and textures are increasing the per-pixel cost, but the overall trend remains the same.

The data shows that the limiting component at 4K is the GPU. The CPU is clearly capable of delivering frame rates well above 200 FPS at lower resolutions, so it is not the bottleneck. The fact that the frame rate halves when going from 1080p to 4K, regardless of settings, points to the GPU’s rendering throughput being the primary constraint. For a game like Inside, which is not graphically intense, this is expected. The resolution scaling analysis suggests that to maintain a 60 FPS average at 4K, the user must select Low or Medium settings, as High and Ultra fall short.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users with a 60 Hz monitor, any setting from Medium to Ultra will provide a flawless experience, as all average frame rates are above 114 FPS. However, for users with a 144 Hz monitor, Medium settings are the best choice, as they deliver an average of 192 FPS, which is close to the monitor’s maximum refresh rate. High settings at 120 FPS are also suitable, but Ultra settings at 114 FPS are slightly too low to fully utilize a 144 Hz panel.

At 1440p, the recommendations shift. For a 60 Hz display, Ultra settings at 82 FPS and High settings at 86 FPS are both perfectly playable. For a 144 Hz display, Medium settings at 138 FPS is the recommended preset, as it is the only one that consistently stays above 120 FPS. Low settings at 172 FPS would also work, but the visual compromise is not necessary given that Medium provides a high frame rate with better image quality. High settings at 86 FPS are not suitable for a 144 Hz monitor, as they would not take advantage of the higher refresh rate.

For 4K, the choice is more constrained. If the target is 60 FPS, Medium settings at 87 FPS is the best option, as it provides a playable frame rate with good visual fidelity. Low settings at 108 FPS are also viable and offer a smoother experience. High and Ultra settings at 54 and 52 FPS, respectively, are below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in noticeable judder on a 60 Hz display. Therefore, the data suggests that Medium settings at 4K is the best balance of performance and quality for this combo, while at 1440p, Medium or High settings are the most versatile.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2301 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the lower half of all tested configurations, which is surprising given the high frame rates measured. This ranking is likely due to the fact that Inside is a lightweight game, and many other tested combos feature higher-end GPUs that achieve even higher frame rates, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. The rank is relative to all other hardware pairings in the database, so a mid-range GPU like the Arc B570 will naturally rank lower than those with top-tier cards.

However, the rank does not tell the full story. The percentile score for the GPU is 65th, and for the CPU it is 81st, indicating that while this combo is not at the very top, it is still above average. The measured FPS data shows that this combo is more than capable of running Inside smoothly at 1080p and 1440p with high frame rates. The low rank is a reflection of the competition, not a deficiency of this hardware. For a puzzle platformer, the performance is more than adequate, and the data confirms that this pairing will not struggle with the game’s demands. The 2301st rank out of 2887 is a statistical position that does not diminish the practical performance demonstrated in the measured FPS tables.