Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a compelling experience in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer released in 2016. The benchmark data indicates this pairing is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate displays, with even the most demanding settings producing frame rates well above 60 FPS at all tested resolutions. The data shows a clear pattern: the CPU provides ample single-thread headroom, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM ensures the game never hits memory bottlenecks, allowing for massive scaling from Low to Ultra settings.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Inside with this hardware?*

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 168 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra, it averages 121 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra, it averages 76 FPS. All three are playable, but 2560x1440 offers the best balance of fidelity and speed for 120 Hz displays.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: No. The Ryzen 7 5800X's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 943, is sufficient to drive the RX 6750 XT to its limits. The frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra settings indicates a GPU-bound workload, not a CPU limitation.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?

A: The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740. This places the RX 6750 XT 1.1% ahead of the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, per the nearestRivals deltaPct.

*Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM on the RX 6750 XT sufficient for Inside at 4K?*

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo averages 128 FPS. The absence of any min FPS data below 109 FPS at this resolution and settings suggests that VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor, allowing for smooth performance at the highest resolutions.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The data shows a significant jump. At 1920x1080 Low, the average FPS is 316, while at Ultra, it drops to 168 FPS. This represents a substantial reduction in frame rate, but even the Ultra setting remains exceptionally high for a smooth experience.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X compare to the Intel Core i5-13500HX?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X has an average benchmark score of 29123, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270. The deltaPct shows the Ryzen 7 5800X is 0.5% behind the i5-13500HX, making them near-identical in overall processing power.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename "Vermeer," provides the computational foundation for this build. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In a game like Inside, which relies heavily on a single main thread for game logic and physics, the CPU's strong single-core performance is paramount. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 943 and the 3dmark_2_threads score of 1846 confirm that the processor can handle the game's primary thread without creating a bottleneck.

The benchmark results for Inside demonstrate that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this pairing. When the GPU is pushed harder by higher resolutions and settings, the frame rates scale accordingly. For instance, at 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 254 on Low to 121 on Ultra, a clear sign that the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and support for dual-channel DDR4 memory via its 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure that data is fed to the cores efficiently. While the CPU's overall percentile rank of 81 puts it above most processors, its performance in this specific title is sufficient to allow the RX 6750 XT to run at full capacity across all tested configurations.

Furthermore, the processor's multi-threading capabilities, reflected in a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15476, are more than adequate for the game's background tasks and any auxiliary applications running concurrently. The data confirms that for Inside, the Ryzen 7 5800X provides a stable and powerful platform, with its performance headroom ensuring that gameplay remains fluid even when the GPU is not fully saturated. The CPU's performance is so robust that the visual settings chosen have a far greater impact on the final frame rate than any potential CPU limitation.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the primary driver of visual performance in this configuration. Based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 22 chip, it features 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs. Its clock speeds are substantial, with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. This raw compute power is complemented by 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS gives an indication of its ability to handle the pixel and shader workloads required by the game.

The benchmark data highlights the GPU's dominance in this pairing. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high, with a Low setting average of 316 FPS and a High setting average of 177 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU still manages to deliver a playable 76 FPS on Ultra settings, showcasing its capability at 4K. The scaling between settings is consistent, with the Ultra preset being roughly half the speed of the Low preset at each resolution. This indicates that the RX 6750 XT is using its full resources to render more complex effects, higher-quality textures, and advanced lighting. The 12 GB VRAM is a key asset, ensuring that even at 4K, the game's assets are held in fast memory, avoiding any stuttering that could arise from memory swapping.

The GPU's performance is rated in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 26011 places it 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. In Inside, this translates to a very smooth experience across the board. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is capable of maintaining high frame rates, with the 2560x1440 Medium setting producing a min FPS of 173 and a max of 234, averaging 203 FPS. This consistency is more important than peak performance, and the data suggests the RX 6750 XT delivers a stable frame pacing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT places this system in a strong position for running Inside. The data shows that this combo ranks 1663 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking is not a measure of absolute top-tier performance but rather indicates that this pairing is well above the median for gaming performance, especially for a title with the graphical simplicity of Inside.

This rank is more reflective of the sheer number of high-end systems tested in the database than a limitation of this hardware. In practice, the frame rates achieved by this combo are exceptionally high. For a game like Inside, which is a cinematic puzzle platformer, the ranking demonstrates that the system has far more power than necessary for a flawless experience. The bottleneck for most users with this combo would be the refresh rate of their monitor, not the hardware itself. The 3716 total combos include many systems with far more expensive and powerful components, but the measured FPS data for this particular pairing shows it outperforming the vast majority of systems in real-world gaming scenarios.

The rank also reflects the balanced nature of the build. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance and the GPU's substantial memory bandwidth and compute power work in tandem to avoid bottlenecks. The fact that the combo achieves a 4K Ultra average of 76 FPS while ranking in the middle of the pack for overall compute power reinforces that Inside is a title that favors GPU fill-rate and memory bandwidth. This specific combination excels in those areas, making its in-game performance better than its raw benchmark ranking might suggest.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this hardware combination shows excellent performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are exceptionally high. With Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 316 FPS. Moving to Medium, the average is 283 FPS with a minimum of 240 FPS and a maximum of 325 FPS. High settings yield an average of 177 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 168 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the GPU is the primary determinant of performance, with the CPU providing more than enough headroom.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive. The Low setting produces an average of 254 FPS. The Medium setting averages 203 FPS, with a minimum of 173 FPS and a maximum of 234 FPS. High settings average 127 FPS, and Ultra settings average 121 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware, as it offers a significant increase in visual fidelity over 1080p while still maintaining frame rates that are well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate gaming.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable performance. The Low setting averages 160 FPS, and Medium averages 128 FPS with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS. High settings average 80 FPS, and Ultra settings average 76 FPS. While the 4K numbers are lower than the other resolutions, they are still perfectly smooth for a game of this genre. The data shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns when increasing settings, but even the most demanding configuration is capable of providing a stable, playable experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the High settings preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination. At 1920x1080, High settings produce an average of 177 FPS, which is more than sufficient for even the fastest gaming monitors. At 2560x1440, the average is 127 FPS, comfortably above 120 FPS for high-refresh-rate displays. Even at 3840x2160, High settings maintain an average of 80 FPS, providing a smooth and detailed 4K experience.

The Ultra preset provides a marginal visual improvement over High but comes with a noticeable performance cost. At 2560x1440, the frame rate drops from 127 FPS to 121 FPS, a minor difference. However, at 1920x1080, the drop is from 177 FPS to 168 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls from 80 FPS to 76 FPS. While these are not massive reductions, the High preset offers a more stable frame rate buffer, especially in scenes with complex lighting or particle effects, where the min FPS data for Medium (109 at 4K) suggests potential for dips.

For players with a standard 60 Hz display, the Ultra settings preset is entirely viable, as the average frame rate at 4K remains above 60 FPS. However, for those with 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended choice, as it consistently delivers frame rates that are high enough to take full advantage of the display's capabilities. The Medium preset is a strong fallback if you prefer to maximize frame rates, but the data indicates that High provides the superior combination of image quality and performance without significant compromise.