Fivem

Fivem, a multiplayer modification platform for a popular open-world title, presents a unique benchmarking scenario due to its heavy reliance on server-side and CPU-bound logic. The data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX shows a configuration that is capable of very high frame rates, yet the scaling patterns across resolutions reveal distinct bottlenecks that are worth methodical examination.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a classic performance curve where the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 304 FPS and the Medium preset at 240 FPS. This clearly indicates that at 1080p, the system is not limited by the graphics card; the frame rates are so high that the CPU and game engine’s thread scheduling are likely the constraining factors. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 155 FPS (304 vs 149), which shows a significant sensitivity to graphical settings even at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS figures drop but remain very playable. The Low preset falls from 304 FPS at 1080p to 200 FPS, a reduction of 104 FPS. The Ultra preset drops from 149 FPS to 98 FPS, a 51 FPS reduction. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear, with the higher settings seeing a smaller absolute drop, suggesting that the GPU is starting to take on a more significant workload, but the CPU is still able to feed it adequately. The Medium preset at 1440p, with an average of 158 FPS and a minimum of 134 FPS, suggests a well-balanced point where both components are working in concert.

The transition to 3840x2160 (4K) shows the most pronounced impact of resolution scaling. The Low preset average FPS drops to 111, which is still respectable, but the Ultra preset falls to just 54 FPS. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K is 57 FPS (111 vs 54). This data indicates that at 4K, the RX 7900 XTX is the primary limiting factor. The GPU’s fillrate and compute capabilities are being fully taxed, and the CPU’s high single-thread performance is no longer the bottleneck. The scaling from 1440p to 4K for the Low preset shows a drop from 200 to 111 FPS, an 89 FPS reduction, which is a massive 44.5% decrease, highlighting the exponential cost of 4K rendering.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a high-end graphics card with a substantial 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a massive 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its architecture, RDNA 3.0, is built on a 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors. The card’s boost clock is rated at 2498 MHz, and its game clock is 2365 MHz. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s, which are key metrics for handling the high-resolution textures and effects that Fivem’s modded environments often introduce.

In the measured results, the GPU’s role is most evident at 4K. The average FPS at 4K High is 70, and at 4K Ultra it drops to 54. This shows that the card is being pushed to its limits with the most demanding settings. The 24 GB VRAM buffer is unlikely to be a limiting factor in most Fivem scenarios, as the game’s base assets and many mods do not require that much memory, but the sheer compute load of 4K rendering is what brings the frame rates down. The data indicates that while the card can handle the game at 4K, it cannot maintain the high refresh rates seen at lower resolutions. The benchmark scores for the GPU, such as a Passmark G3D score of 31238 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841, position it as a powerful performer, but its percentile versus all GPUs is only 64, which is surprisingly low due to the comparison set including many more powerful data center and workstation cards.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor from the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It has 20 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. This CPU is a strong performer in synthetic benchmarks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and a single-core score of 3655. Its Passmark single-thread score of 4412 is particularly relevant for Fivem, which is known for being sensitive to single-thread performance due to its game engine and server communication.

The CPU’s role is clearly demonstrated at 1080p, where the average FPS on Low settings reaches 304. This high frame rate is a direct result of the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls quickly, preventing a CPU-bound bottleneck that would otherwise cap the frame rate lower. The fact that the Ultra preset at 1080p still achieves 149 FPS shows that even with increased graphical load, the processor can keep up. The data suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, as the GPU is not being fully utilized. In contrast, at 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes, as the frame rates are more dependent on the GPU’s rendering speed. The CPU’s 10 cores and 10 threads are sufficient for Fivem, which often does not scale perfectly across many cores, and the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz ensures that the primary game thread runs efficiently.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX ranks 360th out of 3005 combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 12% of all tested systems, indicating a high level of performance. This ranking is likely due to the CPU’s excellent single-core performance, which is crucial for Fivem’s engine, and the GPU’s ability to push high frame rates at lower resolutions.

When looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals by average benchmark score, it is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, with a delta percentage of 0. This means the Ultra 5 225 offers similar compute performance to that rival. Compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, it is only 0.2% slower, and against the Intel Core i9-12900T, it is 0.5% slower. These small deltas suggest that the CPU is a solid mid-range performer, and its ranking in the combo is boosted by the high-end GPU. The GPU’s nearest rivals, based on average score, include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which is 0.4% slower, and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp, which is 1.2% slower. This comparison is misleading in a gaming context, as the RX 7900 XTX is far more capable than a GTX 1060, but the benchmark scores are close due to the nature of the tests. The combo’s overall rank of 360 suggests that many other combinations with more powerful CPUs or optimized pairings can outperform it, but it still represents a very capable system for Fivem.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS for this combination at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 240 FPS, with a minimum of 204 FPS and a maximum of 276 FPS.

Q: Is this system more CPU-bound or GPU-bound at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates a GPU-bound scenario at 3840x2160. The average FPS drops significantly from 111 on Low to 54 on Ultra, showing that the graphics card's rendering capability is the primary constraint.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with a delta percentage of 0, indicating they are performance equals in general compute tasks.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 54, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra settings preset.

Q: Does the CPU's single-thread performance matter for Fivem?

A: Yes, the data suggests it is critical. The CPU has a Passmark single-thread score of 4412 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655, which helps achieve very high frame rates at 1080p (up to 304 FPS on Low), indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck at that resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Low settings is 200, while on Ultra settings it is 98. This represents a performance drop of 102 FPS when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across different resolutions and settings. The following is a detailed breakdown of the exact numbers recorded.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 304. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 240 FPS, with a minimum of 204 and a maximum of 276 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 192 FPS. Finally, the Ultra preset results in an average of 149 FPS. This shows a clear downward trend as graphical fidelity increases, but even the lowest number at this resolution is exceptionally high.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low settings preset achieves an average of 200 FPS. The Medium preset averages 158 FPS, with a minimum of 134 and a maximum of 181 FPS. The High preset produces an average of 126 FPS. The Ultra preset drops the average to 98 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 30-35% reduction in average FPS across most settings, which is a typical penalty for the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. The Low settings preset averages 111 FPS. The Medium preset averages 88 FPS, with a minimum of 74 and a maximum of 101 FPS. The High preset averages 70 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of only 54 FPS. This data confirms that 4K gaming with this combination is possible, but achieving high refresh rates requires lowering the settings to Medium or Low. The minimum FPS of 74 at 4K Medium suggests that there can be noticeable dips in frame rate during intense scenes, which could impact smoothness.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

For 1920x1080, the system is so powerful that even the Ultra preset, with an average of 149 FPS, will provide a very smooth experience on high refresh rate monitors. For players seeking the absolute maximum frame rate for competitive play, the Low preset at 304 FPS is the best choice, as it removes any potential for a CPU bottleneck and maximizes responsiveness.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset offers an excellent balance, with an average of 158 FPS and a minimum of 134 FPS. This ensures that the game remains fluid even in demanding multiplayer scenarios. The High preset, at 126 FPS, is also a solid choice for those who prefer better visual quality while still maintaining a frame rate above 120 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 98 FPS, is still playable but may not fully utilize a 144Hz monitor.

For 3840x2160, the recommendations change significantly. The Ultra preset, at 54 FPS, is only suitable for cinematic, slower-paced play, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset, at 70 FPS, provides a more consistent experience and is the highest setting that maintains playable frame rates. However, the Medium preset, with an average of 88 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS, is the recommended choice for 4K gaming. It offers a significant performance boost over High and Ultra while still providing a good level of visual detail, ensuring the game remains smooth and responsive. The Low preset at 111 FPS is viable for maximum performance, but the visual quality trade-off is substantial.