Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a fundamentally capable Fivem experience, with the measured data showing a combo that ranks 571st out of 1,792 tested configurations. This places the pairing in the top third of all combos, indicating strong overall suitability for the game. The processor, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,935 and a single-core score of 2,249, while the GPU's RDNA 4.0 architecture with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory provides ample headroom for the game's demands. The benchmark results reveal a system that can push well beyond 120 FPS at 1080p on high settings, though 4K Ultra remains a challenge, suggesting a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU-GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 571st out of 1,792 tested combinations, placing it in the top 32% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-9700?

A: The i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 19,850, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-9700's 19,831, making them effectively equivalent in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable with this combo at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 247.3 FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate across all settings and resolutions.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 9070 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock of the RX 9070, and how does it relate to performance?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 2520 MHz and a game clock of 2070 MHz, with a base clock of 1330 MHz, which directly influences the measured frame rates across all tested configurations.

Q: Is this combo better suited for 1080p or 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data indicates 1080p is the sweet spot, with 152.5 FPS average on High settings, while 4K High drops to 54.5 FPS average, showing a 64% performance reduction at the higher resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 holds a rank of 571 out of 1,792 tested combos in Fivem. This percentile placement—roughly the 68th percentile—demonstrates that the pairing outperforms most configurations while still leaving headroom above more premium setups. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,850 places it in the 77th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 34,780 puts it in the 79th percentile against all GPUs. The slight mismatch—GPU slightly ahead of CPU in percentile terms—suggests the processor may occasionally bottleneck the graphics card, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest.

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark performance include the Intel Core i7-9700 at 19,831 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i7-8700 at 19,894 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i5-11600K at 19,771 (0.4% slower). These minuscule deltas indicate that the i5-12400 sits in a highly competitive performance band, where generation-to-generation improvements are marginal. For Fivem specifically, this means the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most scenarios, as its single-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 2,249 provides strong per-core performance that the game can leverage.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing for Fivem, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling across settings. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, the GPU has substantial memory resources that prevent VRAM-related bottlenecks even at 4K Ultra settings. The GPU's 3,584 shading units and 128 ROPs, combined with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, drive the pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s. These specifications translate into measurable performance: at 2560x1440 High settings, the combo achieves 103.8 FPS average, while at 3840x2160 High, it drops to 54.5 FPS.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its capabilities. A PassMark G3D score of 25,381 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 165,532 indicate strong DirectX and Vulkan performance, which matters for Fivem's multi-threaded rendering workload. The GPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the NVIDIA A2 at 34,866 (0.2% faster) and the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 at 34,677 (0.3% slower), showing the RX 9070 is positioned competitively. However, in Fivem specifically, the measured FPS data reveals that the GPU's performance ceiling is reached at 1080p Low (247.3 FPS), beyond which CPU limitations may start to appear.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 247.3 FPS average on Low settings, 193.9 FPS on Medium, 152.5 FPS on High, and 121.2 FPS on Ultra. These figures show a clear progression where each settings tier costs roughly 25-30% performance, with the gap between Low and Ultra being 126.1 FPS (a 51% reduction). At 2560x1440, the averages are 162.7 FPS (Low), 124.4 FPS (Medium), 103.8 FPS (High), and 80.2 FPS (Ultra). The 1440p results show a similar pattern, though the absolute drops are smaller due to the higher resolution taxing the GPU more evenly.

At 3840x2160, the performance landscape shifts dramatically. Low settings produce an average of 89.8 FPS, Medium drops to 73.1 FPS, High falls to 54.5 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 45.3 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, indicating that this combo is not suited for maximum settings at 4K. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 44.5 FPS (a 50% reduction), which is proportionally similar to the 1080p spread, suggesting the GPU is consistently the bottleneck at this resolution across all settings.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior reveals important insights about the limiting component. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 152.5 to 103.8, a 32% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at High, the drop is from 103.8 to 54.5, a 47% reduction. This increasing percentage drop as resolution rises is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the RX 9070's compute resources are progressively saturated. At Low settings, the scaling is steeper: 247.3 FPS at 1080p drops to 162.7 FPS at 1440p (34% lower) and then to 89.8 FPS at 4K (45% lower from 1440p).

The data indicates that at 1080p with Low settings, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads may be approaching their limit, as the 247.3 FPS figure represents a frame rate where per-core processing becomes critical. The i5-12400's single-thread score of 2,249 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can sustain high frame rates, but the 4.40 GHz boost clock is the ceiling for this game's single-threaded workload demands. Conversely, at 4K Ultra (45.3 FPS), the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the resolution and settings demand more pixel throughput than the RX 9070 can deliver.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 provides a solid foundation for Fivem with its 6 cores and 12 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The processor's cache hierarchy—80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3—supports the game's data access patterns, while its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexible platform configurations. In multi-threaded benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,935 and a 3DMark max threads score of 5,890, indicating robust parallel processing capability.

The CPU's role in Fivem becomes most apparent at lower resolutions and settings where frame rates exceed 200 FPS. At 1080p Low, the 247.3 FPS average suggests the i5-12400 is working near its limits, as the game's simulation and network code typically rely on single-threaded performance. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,456 highlight its per-core strength, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in multiplayer scenarios with many entities. However, the CPU's average benchmark score of 19,850 places it just 0.1% above the Core i7-9700 and 0.2% below the Core i7-8700, showing that it is not a class leader but rather a competent mid-range option.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, High settings at 152.5 FPS average provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it easily exceeds the 144 Hz refresh rate common in competitive displays while maintaining substantial visual fidelity. Ultra at 121.2 FPS is also viable for 120 Hz displays, but the 31.3 FPS gain from dropping to High is significant enough to recommend High as the default for most users.

At 2560x1440, High settings at 103.8 FPS average is the recommended choice for 100 Hz or 144 Hz displays, as it delivers smooth gameplay with good visual quality. Medium at 124.4 FPS offers a 20% performance uplift for those prioritizing frame rate over visuals, while Ultra at 80.2 FPS is acceptable for 75 Hz monitors but may feel less responsive. For 4K gaming, the data suggests High settings at 54.5 FPS is the only playable option for 60 Hz displays, though users may prefer Medium at 73.1 FPS for a smoother experience at the cost of some visual detail. Low settings at 89.8 FPS is recommended for competitive play where frame rate trumps visual quality, but the 45.3 FPS Ultra result indicates this combo should not be pushed to maximum settings at 4K.