Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
106
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 48 60 80
1440p QHD 68 87 112 144
1080p Full HD 106 138 170 220

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 80
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 144
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 High 87
2560x1440 Ultra 68
1920x1080 Low 220
1920x1080 Medium 170
1920x1080 High 138
1920x1080 Ultra 106

Fivem with Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a robust Fivem experience, with the data showing a clear hierarchy in settings that prioritizes frame rate headroom over absolute visual fidelity. Across all resolutions, the "Low" preset provides the most playable experience, while "Ultra" demands a heavy toll on performance.

Settings Recommendations

Benchmark results indicate that the "Low" preset is the optimal choice for this combination in Fivem, offering the highest average frame rates at every resolution tested. At 1080p, this setting achieves 219.5 FPS, which is more than double the 105.8 FPS seen at "Ultra". The margin narrows at higher resolutions, but "Low" still maintains a significant advantage: 144.4 FPS at 1440p versus 68.4 FPS for "Ultra", and 80.2 FPS at 4K versus 37.5 FPS for "Ultra".

The "Medium" preset serves as a strong middle ground for users seeking a balance between visual quality and performance. It delivers 170.2 FPS at 1080p, 112.1 FPS at 1440p, and 59.9 FPS at 4K. The "High" preset shows a noticeable performance dip compared to "Medium", with a 32 FPS drop at 1080p (138.3 FPS) and a 24.8 FPS drop at 1440p (87.3 FPS). Given that "Medium" offers a substantial frame rate advantage over "High" with presumably a modest visual trade-off, it represents the most efficient upgrade path from "Low" if the user desires better graphics. The "Ultra" preset should be avoided for competitive or smooth gameplay, as it is the only setting that drops below 40 FPS at 4K, hitting 37.5 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 32 chip, is the primary driver of frame rate scaling as settings change. The card features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is likely a key factor in preventing severe bottlenecks at higher resolutions, where texture data demands increase significantly.

The GPU's clock speeds show a wide operational range, with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. The data suggests that the card is capable of significant dynamic overclocking under load, which helps maintain performance in demanding multiplayer scenarios. The RX 7700 XT has a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s, which are substantial figures that support its ability to push high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as a Passmark G3D score of 22547 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316, corroborates its strength in modern workloads. The card's launch MSRP is 449 USD.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 provides a solid foundation for this gaming workload, utilizing 6 cores and 12 threads from its Alder Lake architecture. Its boost clock of 4.40 GHz is crucial for maintaining high minimum frame rates in a CPU-intensive, multiplayer-focused game like Fivem. The processor's single-thread performance is a strong indicator of its gaming capability, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2249 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 910.

The multi-threaded performance is also respectable, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 and a Passmark multithread score of 18747. This suggests the CPU can handle background tasks and game logic without compromising frame pacing. The processor's 18 MB of shared L3 cache is another asset, potentially aiding in faster access to frequently used game data. The data shows that at 1080p with "Low" settings, the combination reaches 219.5 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently at high frame rates, but the more moderate gains from 1440p to 4K suggest the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 807 out of 1792 combos for Fivem. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, indicating a performance level that is above average but not at the very top end. The percentile data for the individual components supports this position; the CPU is in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score show a very tight grouping. The Intel Core i7-9700 has a deltaPct of 0.1, meaning the i5-12400 is 0.1% behind it, while the Intel Core i5-11600K has a deltaPct of 0.4, meaning the i5-12400 is 0.4% ahead. This indicates the i5-12400 performs nearly identically to these older or similar-tier processors in general benchmarks.

For the GPU, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with a deltaPct of 0, showing a perfect tie in average score. The AMD Radeon RX 570 shows a deltaPct of -0.2, meaning the RX 7700 XT is 0.2% behind it, which is a negligible difference in this synthetic comparison. These close margins highlight that while the individual components are competitive, their combined performance in Fivem is more dependent on the game's specific engine and optimization.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a classic scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K, providing insight into the system's bottleneck. At "Low" settings, the frame rate drops from 219.5 FPS at 1080p to 144.4 FPS at 1440p, a 34% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the frame rate falls further to 80.2 FPS, a 44% decrease. This steep decline at 4K strongly suggests the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor, as the pixel count increases dramatically.

The trend is consistent across other settings. For "Medium", the drop from 1080p (170.2 FPS) to 1440p (112.1 FPS) is a 34% reduction, and then to 4K (59.9 FPS) is a 47% reduction. For "High", the drops are 37% (138.3 to 87.3 FPS) and 45% (87.3 to 47.6 FPS), respectively. At "Ultra", the pattern continues with a 35% drop from 1080p (105.8 FPS) to 1440p (68.4 FPS) and a 45% drop to 4K (37.5 FPS). The consistent percentage drops between 1440p and 4K across all settings indicate that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the dominant factor at those resolutions, whereas the smaller relative drops at 1080p suggest the CPU has more influence on the final frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU and GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The "Low" preset provides the highest average frame rates at all resolutions, with 219.5 FPS at 1080p, 144.4 FPS at 1440p, and 80.2 FPS at 4K, making it the best choice for maximum performance.

Q: How does the frame rate drop when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: The frame rate decreases significantly. For example, at "High" settings, performance drops from 138.3 FPS at 1080p to 47.6 FPS at 4K, a reduction of over 65%.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The percentage drop in FPS from 1440p to 4K is consistently steep across all settings (around 45%), which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

Q: Can this system achieve a high refresh rate experience at 1440p?

A: Yes, the data shows it can. With "Low" settings, the combo reaches 144.4 FPS, and with "Medium" settings, it achieves 112.1 FPS, both of which are suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested systems?

A: This specific combination ranks 807 out of 1792 total combos tested for Fivem, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the performance distribution.

Q: What is the performance difference between the "Medium" and "High" presets at 1080p?

A: The "Medium" preset achieves 170.2 FPS, while "High" achieves 138.3 FPS. This is a 31.9 FPS difference, indicating that "Medium" offers a significant performance advantage over "High".

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p):

  • Ultra: 105.8 FPS average
  • High: 138.3 FPS average
  • Medium: 170.2 FPS average
  • Low: 219.5 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

  • Ultra: 68.4 FPS average
  • High: 87.3 FPS average
  • Medium: 112.1 FPS average
  • Low: 144.4 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K):

  • Ultra: 37.5 FPS average
  • High: 47.6 FPS average
  • Medium: 59.9 FPS average
  • Low: 80.2 FPS average

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 80.2
3840x2160 Medium 59.9
3840x2160 High 47.6
3840x2160 Ultra 37.5
2560x1440 Low 144.4
2560x1440 Medium 112.1
2560x1440 High 87.3
2560x1440 Ultra 68.4
1920x1080 Low 219.5
1920x1080 Medium 170.2
1920x1080 High 138.3
1920x1080 Ultra 105.8

Fivem with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.