Fivem

# Fivem with Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a balanced 1080p and 1440p experience in Fivem, with the data showing strong frame rates at medium and high settings. At 4K, the combination drops below the 60 FPS threshold for most presets, indicating that this pairing is best suited for lower resolutions or adjusted graphical expectations. The combo ranks 905th out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the middle of the database's tested configurations for this multiplayer title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates, with the Low preset hitting 198 FPS average, Medium at 156.7 FPS, and High at 124.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset still delivers 82.1 FPS, making it viable for higher-resolution displays.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured results show 74.7 FPS on Low, 55.8 FPS on Medium, 46.2 FPS on High, and 33.7 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset exceeds 60 FPS, so 4K gaming requires significant settings reductions to remain smooth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 19850, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-9700 (19831) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-11600K (19771). It trails the Intel Core i7-8700 by 0.2% (19894) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX by 0.4% (19928).

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark standing relative to similar cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 35327 on average, sitting 0.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264) and 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435). It ranks slightly below the AMD Radeon 880M by 0.9% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 by 1.3%.

Q: Which settings preset offers the best balance of quality and performance?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset at 124.3 FPS provides a strong balance, while Medium at 156.7 FPS offers higher smoothness. At 2560x1440, High at 82.1 FPS is the recommended choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU bottleneck the system in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as frame rates drop significantly from 1080p to 4K. The CPU's single-thread score of 910 in 3dmark suggests adequate processing capability for the game's demands, but the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth become limiting factors at Ultra settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture chip has an 18 MB shared L3 cache and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type was used in the Fivem tests. The CPU's single-thread benchmark score of 910 in 3dmark and 2249 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong per-core performance, which matters for a multiplayer title like Fivem where game logic and network handling often rely on fewer threads.

The processor's multi-threaded capabilities are demonstrated by its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6692 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15935, alongside a Passmark multithread score of 18747. In the context of Fivem, which is built on a modified Grand Theft Auto V engine, the CPU's ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously—such as rendering game world data, processing player interactions, and managing server communications—contributes to the overall frame rate stability observed across different resolutions.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19850, places it in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals. The deltaPct values show it is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-11600K and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-9700, indicating that the i5-12400 delivers comparable processing power to older high-end parts. This level of performance ensures that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU does not become a limiting factor, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved even at Medium and High settings.

However, the data does not suggest that the CPU is the bottleneck at any tested resolution, as the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K follows a pattern consistent with GPU-bound performance. The CPU's 12 threads and 4.40 GHz boost clock provide sufficient headroom for Fivem's multitasking demands, though the game's optimization and server-side factors may introduce variability that the benchmark data cannot fully capture.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It operates at a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's 40 ray tracing cores and 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance indicate solid computational capability, though Fivem's engine does not heavily utilize ray tracing features.

The GPU's memory configuration is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game world is dense with assets, and the 12 GB VRAM capacity allows for higher texture quality settings without exceeding memory limits. The Passmark G3D score of 20700 and the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 reflect the GPU's overall rendering performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 109310 suggests strong API efficiency. The GPU's percentile ranking of 79 among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35327, places it within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, indicating comparable rasterization performance.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the GPU easily sustains high frame rates across all presets, from 99.2 FPS on Ultra to 198 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the GPU still manages 61.8 FPS on Ultra and 82.1 FPS on High, but the gap between presets widens. At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles with Ultra at 33.7 FPS and High at 46.2 FPS, indicating that the 4K resolution demands more than the GPU can deliver for this game's rendering load. The GPU's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB memory size are sufficient for 1440p gaming, but 4K Ultra exceeds the hardware's capabilities in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 905th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 50th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the pairing's balanced performance profile, where neither component drastically limits the other, but neither excels to push the combo into the upper quartile of results. The rank is consistent with the CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 79th percentile standings, suggesting that the combo performs slightly below what the individual components might suggest due to the game's specific optimization characteristics.

The combo's position in the middle of the rankings indicates that while it delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, many other configurations achieve higher performance in Fivem. The data shows that at 1920x1080 Ultra, the combo reaches 99.2 FPS, which is a solid result, but the 4K Ultra performance of 33.7 FPS highlights the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The combo's rank reflects its versatility rather than peak performance, as it handles 1440p High at 82.1 FPS, a result that many users would find acceptable, but it cannot compete with higher-end GPUs at 4K.

Compared to the nearest rival GPUs, the RX 6750 XT's deltaPct values show it is within 1.3% of the RTX 3080, yet the combo rank in Fivem suggests that the game's engine may favor NVIDIA architectures or that other factors, such as CPU-GPU pairing, influence the final results. The CPU's nearest rivals show minimal performance differences, with deltas under 0.5%, which implies that the CPU choice has a limited impact on the combo's overall ranking in this game.

Settings Recommendations

For 1920x1080 displays, the High preset at 124.3 FPS offers the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, as it provides a 25.3 FPS improvement over Ultra while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 156.7 FPS is another strong option for users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, while the Low preset at 198 FPS is recommended for competitive play where maximum responsiveness is essential.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 82.1 FPS is the recommended choice, as it balances image quality with a frame rate that remains comfortably above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 105.9 FPS offers additional headroom for smoother gameplay, while the Ultra preset at 61.8 FPS is playable but close to the minimum threshold, making it a less safe choice for fluctuating scenes. The Low preset at 131.6 FPS is available for users who prefer maximum performance at this resolution.

For 3840x2160, the Low preset at 74.7 FPS is the only option that delivers a consistently smooth experience, though the Medium preset at 55.8 FPS may be acceptable for users who tolerate slight frame rate dips. The High and Ultra presets at 46.2 FPS and 33.7 FPS respectively are not recommended, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in noticeable stuttering during intense gameplay moments.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its highest frame rates across all presets. The Low preset delivers 198 FPS average, followed by Medium at 156.7 FPS, High at 124.3 FPS, and Ultra at 99.2 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline of approximately 40-55 FPS per tier, with the largest drop occurring between Low and Medium at 41.3 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally, with Low at 131.6 FPS, Medium at 105.9 FPS, High at 82.1 FPS, and Ultra at 61.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 69.8 FPS, representing a 53% reduction in performance. The High preset remains the best balance, offering 20.3 FPS more than Ultra while only 23.8 FPS below Medium.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop significantly, with Low at 74.7 FPS, Medium at 55.8 FPS, High at 46.2 FPS, and Ultra at 33.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 41 FPS, and even the Low preset barely exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that the GPU's performance degrades by roughly 50-60% when moving from 1440p to 4K, depending on the preset, which is consistent with the increased pixel count and memory bandwidth demands.