Archeage

Archeage

AVERAGE FPS
81
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 38 56 62
1440p QHD 45 66 97 109
1080p Full HD 67 98 144 162

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 62
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 109
2560x1440 Medium 97
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Ultra 45
1920x1080 Low 162
1920x1080 Medium 144
1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Ultra 67

Archeage with Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a playable Archeage experience across most settings, but the data reveals a clear bottleneck shift as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combination is heavily CPU-limited in lower presets, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, particularly on Ultra settings. The measured frames per second (FPS) data shows a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at higher resolutions, indicating that the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 12 GB frame buffer and memory bandwidth are stretched thin when pushing 3840x2160 pixels. This analysis breaks down the measured results, compares the combo's standing against other tested configurations, and offers practical settings guidance based solely on the empirical data.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior of this combo is defined by a steep performance cliff as pixel count rises. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 162 FPS, which drops to 109 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 62 FPS at 3840x2160. That represents a 33% performance reduction from 1080p to 1440p, followed by another 43% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The pattern suggests that at 1080p Low, the CPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rate is high enough to expose the i5-12400's six-core, twelve-thread architecture's ceiling in an MMORPG like Archeage.

When moving to High settings, the scaling curve changes shape. At 1080p High, the combo produces 98 FPS; at 1440p High, it drops to 66 FPS; and at 4K High, it falls to 38 FPS. The percentage drops are 33% and 42% respectively, which closely mirrors the Low setting pattern. However, the absolute numbers are lower, indicating that the GPU is now contributing more to the performance equation. The data suggests that at High settings, the RX 6750 XT's 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units are working harder, but the CPU still has headroom to spare.

The Ultra preset exposes the most severe scaling penalty. At 1080p Ultra, the combo manages 67 FPS; at 1440p Ultra, it falls to 45 FPS; and at 4K Ultra, it collapses to 26 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 33%, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 42%, which is the largest relative decline across all settings. This indicates that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is the dominant bottleneck, as the RX 6750 XT's 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 166.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are insufficient to sustain fluid frame rates with maximum visual fidelity.

The Medium preset offers the most complete data set, with minimum and maximum frame rates recorded. At 1080p Medium, the average is 144 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS and maximum of 166 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 97 FPS with a range of 83 to 112 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 56 FPS with a range of 47 to 64 FPS. This data reveals that the frame time consistency degrades as resolution increases, with the gap between minimum and maximum FPS growing from 43 FPS at 1080p to 17 FPS at 4K, suggesting increased GPU workload variance.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT plays a critical role in determining the playability ceiling for this combo. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes a limiting factor at 4K resolutions. The measured data shows that at 4K High, the combo achieves only 38 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold typically desired for smooth gameplay. The GPU's boost clock of 2600 MHz and game clock of 2495 MHz are respectable for the RDNA 2.0 architecture, but they cannot overcome the sheer pixel throughput demands of 3840x2160.

The VRAM capacity is not the primary constraint in this game, as Archeage's system requirements are modest by modern standards. However, the 12 GB frame buffer does provide headroom for texture-heavy scenes at 1440p and 4K, allowing the GPU to maintain consistent performance without spilling into system memory. The data supports this interpretation: at 1440p Medium, the combo maintains a 97 FPS average, which is only 7 FPS below the 1080p Medium result of 144 FPS, suggesting that the memory subsystem is adequately provisioned for this resolution.

The GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 13.31 TFLOPS FP32, are sufficient for Archeage's DirectX 11 rendering path, which is the game's native API. The passmark DirectX 11 score of 180 indicates strong legacy API performance, which matters for a 2014-released MMORPG that may not fully utilize modern DirectX 12 features. The GPU's 40 ray accelerators are irrelevant for this title, as Archeage does not implement ray-traced effects, meaning those resources remain idle during gameplay.

Comparing the RX 6750 XT to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database, it scores 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X and 0.6% higher than the AMD FirePro W7100. The deltaPct values are remarkably small, suggesting that the RX 6750 XT's performance is closely clustered with these older or mobile-class GPUs in synthetic tests, despite its modern architecture. However, the measured FPS data in Archeage shows that the combination with the i5-12400 produces playable results at 1080p and 1440p, which is the practical takeaway for users.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1713 out of 3708 tested combinations in Archeage, placing it in the 54th percentile of all configurations. This mid-pack ranking indicates that while this hardware is far from the top tier, it delivers a competent experience for the game's demands. The rank is influenced by both the CPU's 72nd percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 71st percentile among all graphics cards, but the combination's performance in this specific title is moderated by Archeage's engine limitations.

The i5-12400's nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks include the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i7-1355U, which scores 0.3% higher. These tiny deltas suggest that the i5-12400's six-core, twelve-thread configuration is well-balanced for general compute tasks, but in Archeage, the game's single-threaded nature may favor higher clock speeds over additional cores. The CPU's boost clock of 4.40 GHz and single-thread benchmark score of 910 in 3dmark_single_thread provide context for why it performs adequately in an MMORPG that likely relies on a primary game thread.

The GPU's nearest rivals similarly show tight clustering, with the RX 6750 XT scoring 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and 0.7% higher than the AMD FirePro D700. This proximity in synthetic benchmarks does not translate directly to Archeage performance, as the game's optimization and driver support play significant roles. The combo rank of 1713 out of 3708 places this configuration in the upper half of tested systems, suggesting that users can expect a smooth experience at reasonable settings without needing to invest in flagship hardware.

The percentile data tells a consistent story: both the CPU and GPU sit around the 71-72nd percentile of their respective categories, and their combined performance in Archeage reflects this balanced positioning. The combo does not excel in any particular area but provides a reliable baseline that handles 1080p and 1440p gaming effectively, as evidenced by the measured FPS figures.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured FPS data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings produce an average of 162 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo in any configuration. Medium settings yield 144 FPS with a range of 123 to 166 FPS, indicating excellent frame pacing and headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. High settings deliver 98 FPS, which is still smooth for most displays, while Ultra settings drop to 67 FPS, revealing the performance cost of maximum visual effects. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 95 FPS, or a 141% improvement when dropping to Low, which is substantial but expected given the GPU's capabilities.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally. Low settings produce 109 FPS, which is 53 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings achieve 97 FPS with a range of 83 to 112 FPS, maintaining playability for standard 60 Hz monitors. High settings drop to 66 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay, while Ultra settings fall to 45 FPS, making them less desirable for competitive play. The 1440p data shows that Medium is the sweet spot for this resolution, as it stays above 60 FPS average while providing better visual quality than Low.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. Low settings produce 62 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Medium settings yield 56 FPS with a range of 47 to 64 FPS, meaning the minimum frame rate dips below 60 FPS, which could cause noticeable stuttering in crowded scenes. High settings drop to 38 FPS, which is below the playability threshold for most users, and Ultra settings collapse to 26 FPS, making them essentially unplayable for smooth gameplay. The 4K data indicates that users should stick to Low or Medium settings if they insist on this resolution.

The Medium preset provides the most comprehensive data across all resolutions, with both minimum and maximum FPS recorded. At 1080p, the minimum of 123 FPS and maximum of 166 FPS show a 43 FPS spread, indicating some frame time variance but overall strong performance. At 1440p, the minimum of 83 FPS and maximum of 112 FPS show a 29 FPS spread, which is tighter and suggests more consistent performance. At 4K, the minimum of 47 FPS and maximum of 64 FPS show a 17 FPS spread, which is the smallest range, indicating that the GPU is consistently at its limit without significant spikes.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo across most resolutions. At 1080p, Medium delivers 144 FPS average with a minimum of 123 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides smooth gameplay with headroom for demanding scenes. The 1440p Medium result of 97 FPS average with a minimum of 83 FPS also maintains solid playability, making it the recommended choice for users with 1440p monitors. Even at 4K, Medium achieves 56 FPS average, which is borderline but acceptable for less action-oriented gameplay.

For users prioritizing maximum frame rates at 1080p, the Low preset at 162 FPS is the clear choice, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The High preset at 98 FPS at 1080p is a reasonable middle ground for users who want better graphics without a significant frame rate penalty. However, the data shows that High settings at 1440p (66 FPS) and 4K (38 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less suitable for consistent smoothness. The Ultra preset is only recommended at 1080p (67 FPS), and even then, it is marginal; at higher resolutions, Ultra produces frame rates that are too low for enjoyable gameplay.

The Medium preset's advantage is its consistency. The measured minimum and maximum FPS values at Medium settings show that the combo maintains frame rates within a reasonable range, avoiding the severe drops that can occur at High or Ultra. At 1440p Medium, the minimum of 83 FPS ensures that even in busy MMORPG environments with many players, the frame rate stays above 60 FPS. This makes Medium the safest recommendation for users who want a stable experience without constant settings adjustments.

For 4K users, the data suggests that Low settings (62 FPS) provide the only reliable path to smooth gameplay, as Medium (56 FPS average) dips below 60 FPS at times. While 62 FPS is not ideal for competitive play, it is sufficient for casual exploration and questing in Archeage. Users with 4K displays should be prepared to compromise on visual quality, as the RX 6750 XT's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for maximum settings at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Archeage?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 162, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the peak performance for this combination, with Medium settings following at 144 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Archeage?

A: Yes, but with significant compromises. At 4K with Low settings, the combo achieves 62 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings drop to 56 FPS average with a minimum of 47 FPS, while High and Ultra settings fall to 38 FPS and 26 FPS respectively, which are not recommended for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average of 97 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and indicates strong performance for 1440p gaming.

Q: Which setting offers the best balance of performance and visual quality?

A: The Medium preset provides the best balance across all resolutions. At 1080p, it delivers 144 FPS; at 1440p, it delivers 97 FPS; and at 4K, it delivers 56 FPS. This setting offers the most consistent frame pacing with recorded minimum and maximum values.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations in Archeage?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1713 out of 3708 tested combinations, placing it in the upper half of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.6% higher than the AMD FirePro W7100, and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile in average benchmark scores. These deltas are minimal, indicating similar synthetic performance among these GPUs.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2600 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Archeage

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 62.0
3840x2160 Medium 56.0
3840x2160 High 38.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 109.0
2560x1440 Medium 97.0
2560x1440 High 66.0
2560x1440 Ultra 45.0
1920x1080 Low 162.0
1920x1080 Medium 144.0
1920x1080 High 98.0
1920x1080 Ultra 67.0

Archeage with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Archeage with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + RX 6750 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.