Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 150 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 70 | 88 | 112 |
| 1440p QHD | 98 | 127 | 159 | 201 |
| 1080p Full HD | 150 | 193 | 241 | 305 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination delivers a top-tier experience in Fivem, ranking in the 89th percentile of all tested combos. The data shows exceptional performance across all resolutions, with the most demanding 4K Ultra setting still producing a playable 55 FPS average, while 1080p Low reaches a staggering 305 FPS. This pairing demonstrates that the 12-core, 24-thread CPU with its 128 MB of L3 cache and the 12 GB VRAM GPU form a balanced foundation for both high-refresh-rate competitive play and immersive 4K gaming in this multiplayer title.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. Its base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz place it among the fastest desktop CPUs available, and the benchmark results confirm its strength: it scores 4,646 in Passmark single-thread and 56,154 in Passmark multithread, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47,737. This processor sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of alternatives.
The CPU's large 128 MB L3 cache is particularly relevant for a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification platform that often involves complex scripting and large amounts of player-generated content. The benchmark data shows the CPU handles this workload with ease, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p where the CPU is typically the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 305 FPS average, and at 1080p High it still maintains 193 FPS, demonstrating that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D provides ample headroom for the GPU to operate at maximum capacity.
Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's average benchmark score of 54,762 is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55,093 (a -0.6% delta), and it is slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54,053 (a 1.3% advantage). The data indicates the Ryzen 9 9900X3D also leads the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2% and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%. These close margins suggest that while the CPU is not the absolute fastest in synthetic tests, its combination of high clock speeds, 12 cores, and large cache is more than sufficient for Fivem's demands.
The single-thread performance is particularly strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 3,041 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,269. This matters because Fivem, like many multiplayer games, often has a primary game thread that benefits from high single-core performance. The CPU's 24 threads also handle the background tasks and server communication inherent in multiplayer environments without causing frame dips. The Passmark physics score of 5,340 further supports its capability in game physics calculations. All these factors combine to explain why the measured FPS does not drop dramatically when moving from 1080p Low (305 FPS) to 1080p High (193 FPS) — the CPU is not the limiting factor in this pairing.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically the AD104 chip, and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 2310 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz, and it has 7,680 shading units alongside 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The GPU's benchmark performance places it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 31,624 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024.
The 12 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor for Fivem, as the platform can load extensive custom assets, textures, and mods. The measured FPS at 4K resolution demonstrates the GPU's capability: at 4K Medium, the combo achieves 88 FPS average with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS, while at 4K High it manages 70 FPS. These results indicate that the 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient to feed the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance without creating a bottleneck at higher resolutions.
The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals shows a tight grouping. The RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score of 44,795 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152, a -0.8% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, a -1.3% delta). It also edges out the NVIDIA RTX A6000 by 1.6% while trailing the Intel Arc A730M by 1.7%. This suggests the RTX 4070 Ti is a solid mid-to-high-range performer, and in Fivem specifically, it translates to excellent frame rates even at 4K.
At 1440p, the GPU excels: 1440p High produces 127 FPS, 1440p Medium hits 159 FPS, and 1440p Low reaches 201 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p shows the GPU's headroom — moving from 4K Ultra (55 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (98 FPS) nearly doubles the frame rate. The RTX 4070 Ti's 80 ROPs and 240 TMUs handle the pixel and texture throughput efficiently, and the 12 GB VRAM proves adequate even at 4K Ultra settings, where the average FPS of 55 remains playable. The data confirms the GPU is the more significant performance limiter compared to the CPU, particularly at 4K, but it still delivers a strong experience across all tested configurations.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination ranks 324th out of 3,005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 10.8% of all systems tested. This rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing; while neither component is the absolute top performer in its class, their synergy produces excellent results in this game. The CPU's 91st percentile standing and the GPU's 84th percentile standing combine to yield a system that outranks the vast majority of alternatives.
The rank of 324 out of 3,005 is particularly impressive when considering the GPU is from the previous generation (end-of-life production status) and the CPU is a new release from 2025. This suggests that Fivem benefits more from the high single-thread performance and large cache of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D than it does from having the absolute fastest GPU. The data shows that the combo outperforms many systems with more expensive or newer components, indicating that the CPU's 5.50 GHz boost clock and 128 MB L3 cache are well-suited to Fivem's specific workload.
The measured FPS data supports this ranking. At 1080p, the combo achieves frame rates that exceed what most displays can show (305 FPS at Low, 241 FPS at Medium), and at 1440p it maintains high refresh rates (201 FPS at Low, 159 FPS at Medium). Even at 4K, the system delivers playable frame rates across all settings, with 70 FPS at High and 88 FPS at Medium. This versatility across resolutions is a hallmark of a top-tier combo, and the ranking reflects that the system is in the upper echelon of all tested configurations.
The comparison to the CPU's nearest rivals is instructive. While the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a slightly higher average benchmark score, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's advantage in Fivem likely comes from its larger cache and higher boost clock. Similarly, the RTX 4070 Ti's performance is competitive with newer mobile GPUs, showing that its 12 GB VRAM and 2610 MHz boost clock are still highly relevant. The combo's rank of 324 out of 3,005 confirms the fact that this pairing hits a sweet spot for Fivem, avoiding the diminishing returns of ultra-high-end components while delivering near-top-tier performance.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates: Low produces 305 FPS, Medium produces 241 FPS with a minimum of 205 and maximum of 277, High produces 193 FPS, and Ultra produces 150 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors well beyond 144 Hz, with even the most demanding Ultra settings maintaining a 150 FPS average.
Moving to 1440p, the performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling. Low delivers 201 FPS, Medium delivers 159 FPS with a minimum of 135 and maximum of 182, High delivers 127 FPS, and Ultra delivers 98 FPS. The 1440p Medium result is particularly notable — the minimum of 135 FPS ensures a smooth experience on 144 Hz monitors, while the maximum of 182 FPS shows the system's headroom. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by approximately 30-35% across all settings, which is consistent with the increased pixel count.
At 4K, the system still delivers playable results. Medium settings produce 88 FPS average with a minimum of 75 and maximum of 101, High produces 70 FPS, Low produces 112 FPS, and Ultra produces 55 FPS. The 4K Low result of 112 FPS is impressive, showing that the system can exceed 100 FPS at 4K when settings are reduced. However, the 4K Ultra result of 55 FPS is the only measurement that falls below 60 FPS, indicating that this is the most demanding configuration tested. The data shows a clear pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases, from a 155 FPS difference at 1080p to a 57 FPS difference at 4K.
The minimum and maximum values for Medium settings at each resolution provide insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the range from 205 to 277 FPS (a 72 FPS spread) shows some variance but remains well above playable thresholds. At 1440p, the range narrows to 135 to 182 FPS (a 47 FPS spread), and at 4K, it narrows further to 75 to 101 FPS (a 26 FPS spread). This suggests that at higher resolutions, the system is more consistent, likely because the GPU becomes the limiting factor and the frame rate is more stable. The lack of minimum and maximum data for other settings prevents a full comparison, but the Medium results indicate that the system maintains smooth performance throughout.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS consistently?
A: The data shows that 1440p Low achieves 201 FPS, 1440p Medium achieves 159 FPS, and 1440p High achieves 127 FPS, all above 100 FPS. At 4K, only Low (112 FPS) exceeds 100 FPS, while Medium drops to 88 FPS. Therefore, 1440p is the best resolution for maintaining over 100 FPS across multiple settings.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB VRAM affect performance at 4K?
A: The 12 GB VRAM appears sufficient for 4K in Fivem, as evidenced by the measured results: 4K Ultra averages 55 FPS, 4K High averages 70 FPS, 4K Medium averages 88 FPS, and 4K Low averages 112 FPS. The GPU's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports these frame rates without apparent VRAM-related stuttering, though the 4K Ultra result of 55 FPS indicates performance limits are being reached.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D the bottleneck at 1080p Low?
A: The CPU's performance suggests it is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 305 FPS, which is near the upper limits of what most CPUs can deliver. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,646 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,269 indicate it has the single-core strength to handle high frame rates, and its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs supports this conclusion.
Q: How does this combo's rank in Fivem compare to its individual component rankings?
A: The combo ranks 324th out of 3,005 tested combos (top 10.8%). The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The combo's ranking is higher than what the GPU's percentile alone would suggest, indicating that the CPU's strengths in single-thread performance and cache size are particularly beneficial for Fivem.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, Low produces 305 FPS and Ultra produces 150 FPS, a difference of 155 FPS. At 1440p, Low produces 201 FPS and Ultra produces 98 FPS, a difference of 103 FPS. At 4K, Low produces 112 FPS and Ultra produces 55 FPS, a difference of 57 FPS. The performance gap narrows as resolution increases, showing that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: Yes, the data shows it can handle 4K gaming. The 4K Low setting achieves 112 FPS, 4K Medium achieves 88 FPS, and 4K High achieves 70 FPS, all above the commonly accepted 60 FPS threshold. Even 4K Ultra at 55 FPS is playable, though it falls below 60 FPS. The 4K Medium result with a minimum of 75 FPS and maximum of 101 FPS provides a particularly smooth experience.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data reveals that the best experience depends on the user's display and performance priorities. For 1080p users, Medium settings at 241 FPS average (205 minimum, 277 maximum) offer the optimal balance, providing frame rates far beyond any standard display refresh rate while maintaining visual quality. The jump from Medium to High at 193 FPS is still excellent, but the 48 FPS drop may not justify the marginal visual improvement for competitive play. Ultra at 150 FPS remains viable for those prioritizing image quality.
For 1440p users, Medium settings at 159 FPS (135 minimum, 182 maximum) deliver the best experience, ensuring smooth gameplay on 144 Hz and even 165 Hz monitors while maintaining good visual fidelity. High settings at 127 FPS are also excellent for 120 Hz displays, and the 32 FPS difference between Medium and High is acceptable for those who want better graphics. Ultra at 98 FPS is the recommended choice for those with 100 Hz or 120 Hz displays, as it stays above 60 FPS and offers the full visual package.
For 4K users, Medium settings at 88 FPS (75 minimum, 101 maximum) provide the best overall experience, combining smooth performance with good visual quality. The minimum of 75 FPS ensures no significant frame drops, making it ideal for 60 Hz displays and even some 75 Hz monitors. High settings at 70 FPS are a solid alternative for those who prefer higher visual fidelity and have a 60 Hz display, as the frame rate remains comfortably above 60 FPS. Low settings at 112 FPS are recommended for competitive play at 4K, while Ultra at 55 FPS should only be used for static scenes or screenshots, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions, delivering the highest frame rates that still maintain visual quality without the performance cost of High or Ultra. For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p monitors, Low settings unlock the full potential of the system, with 305 FPS at 1080p Low and 201 FPS at 1440p Low, ensuring the CPU and GPU are never the bottleneck in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 112.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 88.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 201.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 159.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 127.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 305.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 241.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 193.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 150.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 4070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.