Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti delivers a rank of 378 out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 10.2% of all configurations. The data shows a system that handles this multiplayer title with substantial headroom at lower resolutions, while 4K Ultra settings push the GPU to its limits. The 12-core/24-thread processor with a 128 MB L3 cache and the 16 GB GDDR7 graphics card form a balanced pairing, though the FPS scaling patterns reveal where each component takes the lead.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows the strongest performance at 1920x1080, where the low preset achieves an average of 314 FPS and even Ultra settings maintain 154 FPS. At 2560x1440, the low preset still delivers 207 FPS, while 3840x2160 ranges from 115 FPS on low to 56 FPS on Ultra.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 378th out of 3,707 tested combinations in Fivem, which places it in the top 10.2% of all results. This rank reflects the combined capability of both components in this specific game.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 314 FPS while Ultra averages 154 FPS, representing a 160 FPS drop. The Medium preset sits between at 247 FPS, and High achieves 198 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti's memory capacity matter for Fivem?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The measured results show that even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 56 FPS, indicating the memory configuration is sufficient for this game's demands.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54,762, which is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093) and 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053). It also leads the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2% and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%.

Q: What is the FPS consistency like at Medium settings?

A: The Medium preset is the only setting with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p, it ranges from 210 to 285 FPS with a 247 average; at 1440p from 138 to 187 with a 163 average; and at 4K from 77 to 104 with a 90 average.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The memory subsystem runs at 1750 MHz, delivering 28 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus. This configuration produces a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s, which the Fivem benchmark results suggest is well-matched to the game's requirements.

The GPU's 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer is a decisive factor in this game's performance scaling. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 56 FPS while the Low preset achieves 115 FPS, a difference that reflects the increasing memory pressure and shading load at higher settings. The 8,960 shading units and 280 texture mapping units process the scene data, while 96 ROPs handle the final pixel output. The measured 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is available for both graphics and compute workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti's pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s appear in the FPS numbers: the 4K Medium result of 90 FPS with a 77 FPS minimum shows the GPU maintaining consistent frame delivery under moderate load. The gap between Low (115 FPS) and High (72 FPS) at 4K suggests that the High preset introduces effects that meaningfully increase the per-frame workload.

The GPU's ray tracing cores (70) and tensor cores (280) are present but not directly measured in this Fivem dataset. The PassMark G3D score of 32,974 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,604 provide synthetic reference points, with the GPU ranking in the 86th percentile versus all GPUs.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 378 out of 3,707 places this configuration in the top 10.2% of all tested combinations in Fivem. This is a strong showing, though not an elite top-100 placement. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's 91st percentile standing (versus all CPUs) and the GPU's 86th percentile (versus all GPUs).

The CPU's synthetic benchmark average of 54,762 places it just behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55,093, a 0.6% gap) but ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54,053, 1.3% ahead), the Intel Xeon 6505P (53,701, 2% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-14700F (53,620, 2.1% ahead). This processing power translates directly to the high FPS numbers seen at lower resolutions in Fivem.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49,957 sits within 2% of several near-neighbors: the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is 0.1% behind, the Intel Arc A550M is 0.4% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is 3.1% behind. This clustering indicates the RTX 5070 Ti is competitive with a range of previous-generation high-end cards.

The rank of 378 suggests that while this is a capable pairing, there are 377 combinations that achieve better results in Fivem specifically. The 1080p results (up to 314 FPS average) show the system is not leaving significant performance on the table at lower resolutions, but the 4K Ultra result of 56 FPS indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at the highest settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 314 FPS average, which is excessive for most displays. The Medium preset at 247 FPS with a 210 FPS minimum offers a better balance between visual quality and performance, while the High preset at 198 FPS still leaves substantial headroom. The Ultra preset at 154 FPS is perfectly playable and offers the best image quality without dipping below 60 FPS.

For 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 207 FPS, Medium reaches 163 FPS with a 138 FPS minimum, and High maintains 130 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 101 FPS, which is still smooth but begins to approach the threshold where frame pacing becomes more noticeable. The Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot at this resolution, providing a 163 FPS average that comfortably exceeds 144 Hz refresh rates while keeping the minimum above 138 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Low preset averages 115 FPS, Medium 90 FPS, High 72 FPS, and Ultra 56 FPS. For 60 FPS gaming, Medium is the highest setting that maintains a comfortable margin above this threshold. High at 72 FPS is viable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra at 56 FPS falls below the 60 FPS target and is best avoided for competitive play.

The data indicates that Medium settings offer the most consistent experience across all resolutions, as it is the only preset with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values showing stable frame delivery. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 4K, High settings provide the best compromise between quality and playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its peak performance. The Low preset averages 314 FPS, the highest measured result in this dataset. Medium settings achieve 247 FPS with a minimum of 210 and maximum of 285 FPS. High settings produce 198 FPS, while Ultra averages 154 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 160 FPS, representing a 51% reduction in average frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 207 FPS, Medium 163 FPS (minimum 138, maximum 187), High 130 FPS, and Ultra 101 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces performance by 34% on Low (from 314 to 207 FPS), 34% on Medium (from 247 to 163 FPS), 34% on High (from 198 to 130 FPS), and 34% on Ultra (from 154 to 101 FPS). This consistent scaling suggests the GPU workload increases roughly proportionally with pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 115 FPS, Medium 90 FPS (minimum 77, maximum 104), High 72 FPS, and Ultra 56 FPS. The 4K results show a more pronounced drop from 1440p: Low decreases by 44% (from 207 to 115 FPS), Medium by 45% (from 163 to 90 FPS), High by 45% (from 130 to 72 FPS), and Ultra by 45% (from 101 to 56 FPS). The slightly larger drop at 4K indicates the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated at this resolution.

The Medium preset at 4K (90 FPS average) outperforms the Ultra preset at 1440p (101 FPS average) by a small margin, demonstrating that resolution has a greater impact on performance than settings in the upper range. The minimum FPS values recorded for Medium settings show the frame pacing: 210 at 1080p, 138 at 1440p, and 77 at 4K, each representing roughly a 40% reduction as resolution increases.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge). It operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.50 GHz. The processor includes a 128 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for gaming workloads, along with 80 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 cache per core. This cache configuration is particularly relevant for Fivem, which often involves complex scripting and entity management.

The CPU's synthetic benchmarks show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 47,737, while the single-core score is 6,739. The Geekbench multicore result is 22,884, and the single-core score is 3,041. The 3DMark 16-thread test scores 12,490, while the max-thread test reaches 13,795. These scores indicate the processor can handle both single-threaded game logic and multi-threaded background tasks.

In Fivem, the CPU's contribution is most evident at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 314 FPS average suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough frames to saturate even high-refresh-rate displays. The 1080p Ultra result of 154 FPS still demonstrates strong CPU performance, as the GPU workload at this resolution is relatively light compared to 4K.

The PassMark multithread score of 56,154 and single-thread score of 4,646 place the CPU in the 91st percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are within a narrow 2.7% band (from 53,620 for the Intel Core i7-14700F to 55,093 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF), indicating the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is competitive with the current mid-range to high-end desktop processors.

The 120W TDP and dual-chiplet design (2x 70.6 mm² die size) with 16,630 million transistors on a 4nm process contribute to the CPU's power efficiency, though the Fivem results do not include power consumption measurements. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 support is adequate for this game's data requirements.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component at each resolution. At 1080p, the system achieves between 154 and 314 FPS depending on settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,269, Geekbench single-core of 3,041) allows it to keep pace with the GPU's frame production at this resolution.

At 1440p, performance drops by approximately 34% across all settings compared to 1080p. This consistent percentage suggests that the GPU is becoming the primary limiter, as pixel count increases by 78% (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels) but FPS only drops by 34%. The GPU's 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB frame buffer are sufficient to handle this resolution without hitting memory capacity limits.

The transition to 4K (8.29 million pixels, a 125% increase from 1440p) results in a 44-45% FPS drop across all settings. This steeper decline indicates the GPU is now the definitive bottleneck, as the pixel fill rate requirements (235.4 GPixel/s maximum) become the limiting factor. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as the frame rate drops below 115 FPS even on Low settings, giving the processor ample time to prepare frames.

The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting component at any resolution in this Fivem configuration. Even at 1080p Low with 314 FPS, the CPU's benchmark scores suggest it could potentially deliver even higher frame rates if the GPU were not the constraining factor. The GPU becomes progressively more dominant as resolution increases, with the 4K Ultra result of 56 FPS representing a 82% reduction from the 1080p Low result of 314 FPS.

This scaling behavior is typical of a balanced system where the CPU has sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions, while the GPU's raw throughput (43.94 TFLOPS FP32) determines the upper limit at higher resolutions. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory capacity ensures that texture loading and memory bandwidth do not introduce additional stutters, as evidenced by the Medium preset minimum FPS values remaining proportional to average FPS at each resolution.