Fivem

# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX produces a highly capable Fivem configuration, ranking 360th out of 3005 tested combos in this game. The data shows a system that delivers playable framerates across all tested resolutions and settings, with a clear pattern of CPU limitation at lower resolutions and GPU scaling becoming more prominent as resolution increases. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data, component roles, and practical settings recommendations based solely on the provided benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 304 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At 2560x1440 Low, the average drops to 200 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low, it reaches 111 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 360th out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the top 12% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: Which setting preset provides the most consistent performance at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 158 average FPS with a minimum of 134 FPS and maximum of 181 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution with complete min/max data, indicating relatively stable frame delivery.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between consecutive settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the jump from Medium (240 FPS) to High (192 FPS) represents a 48 FPS drop, while the drop from High to Ultra (149 FPS) is 43 FPS. The largest single gap is between Low (304 FPS) and Medium (240 FPS), a 64 FPS reduction.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 1269 in 3dmark single-thread and 3041 in Geekbench single-core. Its multi-thread scores are 13795 in 3dmark max threads and 22884 in Geekbench multicore, showing strong scaling from 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking relative to all tested GPUs?

A: The RX 7900 XTX sits at the 64th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19410. Its nearest rival by average score is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which is 0.4% higher.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX brings substantial graphics resources to Fivem, headlined by 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. This large memory pool and wide bus are relevant for a multiplayer game where texture streaming and asset variety can vary dramatically between servers. The GPU's 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, and 192 ROPs provide the raw processing capacity to handle high-resolution rendering.

Clock speeds show a base of 1929 MHz, a game clock of 2365 MHz, and a boost clock of 2498 MHz. The memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed. These clocks, combined with the architecture's RDNA 3.0 design on a 5 nm process, produce peak figures of 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 and a pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s indicates strong fill-rate capabilities for detailed scenes.

In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, framerates scale from 54 FPS at Ultra to 111 FPS at Low, a 57 FPS range that shows the GPU bearing the brunt of graphical load. The 24 GB VRAM is unlikely to be a limiting factor given the game's release date and typical asset sizes, but the bandwidth and ROP count help maintain throughput when multiple players and vehicles populate the scene. The GPU ranks at the 64th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 19410, but its nearest rivals in that aggregate metric—like the GTX 1060 3 GB at 0.4% higher—do not reflect its actual gaming performance tier. In Fivem, the measured results show the 7900 XTX delivering well above playable thresholds even at 4K Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression across resolutions reveals a classic scaling pattern where the CPU becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, average framerates range from 149 FPS at Ultra to 304 FPS at Low. Moving to 2560x1440, the same settings produce 98 to 200 FPS. At 3840x2160, the range tightens to 54 to 111 FPS.

The relative drops tell a clear story. From 1080p Low (304 FPS) to 1440p Low (200 FPS), performance falls by 104 FPS, a 34% reduction. From 1440p Low to 4K Low (111 FPS), the drop is 89 FPS, another 44.5% reduction. At Ultra settings, the progression is 149 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K—a consistent halving at each step up in resolution.

This scaling behavior indicates that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound, as the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 12 cores and 24 threads can feed frames faster than the GPU can render at higher resolutions. The 304 FPS at 1080p Low suggests the CPU is capable of delivering very high framerates when graphics load is minimal. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more dominant, evidenced by the larger absolute FPS drops between Low and Ultra settings at higher resolutions. At 4K, the gap between Low (111 FPS) and Ultra (54 FPS) is 57 FPS, compared to 155 FPS at 1080p, showing that GPU load compresses the performance envelope.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration ranks 360th out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 12% of all tested systems. This rank reflects the combination's ability to maintain high framerates across all settings and resolutions, with even the worst-case scenario (4K Ultra) staying above 50 FPS average.

The rank is notable given that the individual components have contrasting aggregate benchmark positions. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 54762, while the GPU is at the 64th percentile with an average score of 19410. The combo's strong in-game rank suggests that Fivem's workload benefits more from the CPU's strengths than the GPU's aggregate benchmark position might imply.

The CPU's nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks provide context for its processing capability. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 55093, which is 0.6% lower than the 9900X3D. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, 1.3% lower. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, 2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, 2.1% lower. These small deltas show the 9900X3D is competitive with modern mid-range and previous-generation high-end parts in overall CPU benchmarks.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals by average score are the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 at 19602 (1% higher), the AMD FirePro D300 at 19637 (1.2% higher), and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp at 19177 (1.2% lower). These are older or workstation-oriented cards, highlighting that the 7900 XTX's aggregate score may understate its gaming capability relative to its actual Fivem performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) on a 4 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 120 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with PCIe Gen 5 for 24 CPU lanes.

Cache configuration is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming workloads, particularly in multiplayer titles like Fivem where many entities and scripts operate simultaneously. The 3D V-Cache technology (implied by the X3D designation) helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark scores show balanced performance across synthetic tests. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 47737, while single-core scores 6739. Geekbench multicore hits 22884 with single-core at 3041. The 3dmark tests show scaling from 1269 single-thread to 13795 max threads, demonstrating effective multi-core utilization. Passmark multithread scores 56154, with single-thread at 4646.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears dominant at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 304 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's frame-delivery limit given the game's simulation and networking overhead. The high single-thread score (1269 in 3dmark single-thread) supports strong per-core performance for the game's main thread, while the 24 threads handle background tasks like asset streaming and AI. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it is near the top of the processor hierarchy, and its nearest rivals show it outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF by 0.6% on average.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results show a wide performance range. Low settings produce 304 average FPS. Medium settings yield 240 average FPS with a minimum of 204 and maximum of 276. High settings drop to 192 average FPS. Ultra settings reduce performance to 149 average FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 155 FPS, indicating that graphics settings have a significant impact at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, framerates remain high but compress somewhat. Low settings deliver 200 average FPS. Medium settings produce 158 average FPS with a minimum of 134 and maximum of 181. High settings achieve 126 average FPS. Ultra settings drop to 98 average FPS. The Low-to-Ultra gap narrows to 102 FPS, showing increased GPU load at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the range tightens further. Low settings yield 111 average FPS. Medium settings produce 88 average FPS with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 101. High settings deliver 70 average FPS. Ultra settings fall to 54 average FPS. The Low-to-Ultra gap is 57 FPS at 4K.

The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the 204-276 FPS range shows a 72 FPS spread. At 1440p, the 134-181 FPS range shows a 47 FPS spread. At 4K, the 74-101 FPS range shows a 27 FPS spread. This pattern indicates that frame time consistency improves as resolution increases, likely because the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck and its workload is more predictable than CPU-bound scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting 1920x1080, the data suggests that High settings (192 FPS) provide an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, far exceeding typical 60-144 Hz display refresh rates. Ultra settings at 149 FPS still deliver very smooth gameplay if maximum visual fidelity is desired. Low settings at 304 FPS are only necessary for competitive play on high-refresh monitors or if frame rate consistency is paramount.

At 2560x1440, High settings (126 FPS) remain strongly recommended, as they maintain framerates above 120 FPS while offering better visuals than Medium. Ultra settings at 98 FPS are viable for 60 Hz displays but may not fully satisfy 120 Hz+ monitors. Medium settings at 158 FPS provide an excellent fallback for players who prioritize frame rate stability, given the complete min/max data showing a 47 FPS spread.

At 3840x2160, the choice narrows. High settings (70 FPS) offer the best balance for 60 Hz displays, providing headroom above 60 FPS. Medium settings (88 FPS) are preferable for smoother motion, with the 74-101 FPS range indicating good consistency. Ultra settings at 54 FPS are playable but sit below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less ideal for most users. Low settings at 111 FPS sacrifice significant visual quality but deliver the highest 4K performance.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset demonstrates the most stable frame delivery based on available min/max data, with the narrowest relative spread at each resolution. Players experiencing performance issues on High or Ultra should consider Medium as the first step down, as the measured data shows it maintains solid framerates while providing better consistency than the higher presets. For those with high-refresh displays at 1080p or 1440p, the High preset offers the best compromise between visual quality and frame rate headroom.