Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the Intel Arc B390 lands at rank 2656 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the bottom 12th percentile of all systems measured, a position driven almost entirely by the graphics solution. The CPU itself is a strong performer in synthetic tests, but the Arc B390’s low GPU percentile and modest frame rates anchor the combo’s overall standing. Benchmark results indicate that while the processor has ample headroom, the graphics component becomes the definitive bottleneck in this multiplayer title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2656 out of 3005 is a clear signal that this configuration is not optimized for Fivem’s demands. In the database’s hierarchy, this position places it far below the median system, reflecting a fundamental imbalance between the two components. The CPU’s percentile of 81 versus all processors suggests it is a well-above-average part, while the GPU’s percentile of 9 versus all graphics cards indicates a severely underpowered counterpart. The data shows a stark contrast: a top-tier processor paired with an entry-level graphics solution yields a combined result that is less than the sum of its parts.

Examining the measured frames per second, the best average FPS achieved across all settings and resolutions is 88 at 1080p Low. This figure, while playable for some, is not competitive with the higher-performing combos in the database. The gap between this pairing and the top-ranked systems is substantial, as the rank delta suggests. For context, the CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29868 and a delta of 0%, show that the processor is competitive with other mid-range chips. However, the GPU’s nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (average score 1463, delta 1.3%), are ancient, low-end parts. This pairing’s overall rank is a direct consequence of the GPU’s position in the performance hierarchy.

The combination’s ranking also highlights a mismatch in generation and capability. The Ryzen 7 5800XT is an active, modern desktop processor with a launch MSRP of $249, while the Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a system-shared memory configuration. The data suggests that this combo would be suitable for basic computing tasks, but for a game like Fivem, which relies on consistent GPU throughput, the rank reflects a hardware pairing that struggles to maintain fluid performance at higher settings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the limiting factor in this combo, and its specifications confirm why. As an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture with a Panther Lake chip, it operates with system-shared memory. Its base clock is 300 MHz and its boost clock is 2500 MHz, providing a theoretical FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, alongside 12 ray tracing cores. While these numbers indicate a capable iGPU for basic tasks, they are insufficient for demanding gaming workloads at higher resolutions.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role is evident in the frame rate scaling. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 88 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 43 FPS, a 51% reduction from the lowest settings. The GPU’s 9th percentile ranking versus all GPUs underscores its position; it is outperformed by the vast majority of discrete graphics solutions. The nearest rival data reinforces this: the Arc B390’s average benchmark score of 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad is only 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, a GPU from a bygone era. This is not a component designed for high-refresh-rate gaming.

The system-shared memory architecture means that the GPU relies on the CPU’s DDR4 memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. This configuration often results in lower effective memory bandwidth compared to dedicated VRAM, which directly impacts texture streaming and frame pacing in open-world multiplayer games like Fivem. The data shows that as settings increase, the GPU struggles to maintain frame rates, with the 4K Ultra preset yielding an average of just 16 FPS. The GPU’s pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s are modest figures that align with its low percentile ranking, confirming that it is the primary constraint in this pairing.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear pattern of GPU limitation. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 88 FPS, which drops to 58 FPS at 1440p Low (-34%) and further to 32 FPS at 4K Low (-64%). This steep decline with increasing resolution is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics processor cannot keep up with the pixel count. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (a 3DMark single-thread score of 959) is insufficient to compensate for the GPU’s lack of raw throughput.

At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 70, with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 80. Moving to 1440p Medium, the average drops to 46 FPS (a 34% reduction), and at 4K Medium, it falls to 25 FPS (a 64% reduction from 1080p). This consistent scaling suggests that the GPU is the limiting component at every resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect frame rates to remain relatively stable across resolutions, but the data shows a linear decline that tracks with the number of pixels rendered.

The 4K results are particularly telling. At 4K High, the average FPS is 20, and at 4K Ultra, it is 16. These figures are borderline unplayable for a multiplayer game, where responsiveness is critical. The 1080p High preset achieves 56 FPS, which is playable but not smooth by modern standards. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings shows a 64% drop in performance (56 FPS to 20 FPS), which is a severe penalty that only a more powerful GPU could mitigate. Benchmark results indicate that for this combo, 1080p is the only viable resolution for a playable experience, and even then, only at lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 88, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, which is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463) and 2.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443).

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT a high-performing processor?

A: Yes, the CPU has a percentile of 81 versus all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 29879. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 23794 and single-core score is 3359.

Q: What is the frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 70. At 4K Medium, it drops to 25 FPS, a 64% reduction.

Q: Does the combo support ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 12 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but the measured FPS data does not include ray tracing benchmarks.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2656 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a Zen 3 (Vermeer) processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on a 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 105 W. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel architecture and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications are representative of a solid mid-range desktop processor from the 5000 series.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, which are often single-threaded in nature. The Ryzen 7 5800XT’s single-thread performance is strong, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359. This ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck in most scenarios. The multicore performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794, which is higher than its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (delta of 0.6% in favor of the 5800XT).

However, the CPU’s capabilities are underutilized in this pairing because the GPU cannot keep up. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the FPS is 88, which is likely near the CPU’s ceiling for this game. At higher resolutions, the FPS drops, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms that it is a capable part, but its performance is wasted when paired with a GPU that ranks in the 9th percentile. The 16 threads and 8 cores provide ample processing power for Fivem’s multiplayer environment, but the integrated graphics solution prevents the system from achieving higher frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which yields 88 FPS. This is the only configuration that approaches a smooth 60+ FPS experience. The Medium preset at 1080p achieves 70 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS, which is also playable and offers better visual fidelity without a significant performance hit. For users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate, the High preset at 1080p provides 56 FPS, which is acceptable for a less competitive environment.

At 1440p, the Low preset delivers 58 FPS, which is marginally playable, but the Medium preset drops to 46 FPS, and High falls to 37 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is only viable at Low settings for a consistent experience. At 4K, all settings yield average FPS below 33, with Ultra at 16 FPS, making it unsuitable for gameplay. The recommendation is to stick to 1080p Low or Medium for the best balance of performance and visual quality. The Medium preset at 1080p offers a 20% reduction in FPS compared to Low (70 vs 88) but provides improved textures and effects, which is a reasonable trade-off for this hardware. Ultimately, the measured rows show that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming at lower presets, and users should avoid 4K entirely.