Fivem

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 2 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This is a 3000-series desktop part running on the AM4 socket, and its multi-threaded capability is reflected in synthetic benchmarks like the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,087 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 8,083. In single-thread workloads, it posts a Cinebench R23 score of 2,694, which is notably weaker than its multi-core showing, and this gap is significant for a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification that often places heavy demands on per-core performance for physics and scripting.

The data suggests that the 3700X is a balanced processor, but not one that excels at single-threaded tasks. Its PassMark single-thread score of 2,656 puts it in a competent, mid-range position, but its PassMark physics score of 1,181 is comparatively low. This becomes relevant when analyzing the FPS data: at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 146.7 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 72.3 FPS. The drop is not linear, indicating that the CPU is not the sole bottleneck at higher settings; instead, the GPU workload increases, shifting the balance. The 3700X has a 32 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, which helps in maintaining consistent frame pacing, but the architecture’s single-thread ceiling likely caps performance in scenarios where Fivem’s server-side simulation and client-side rendering overlap.

The processor sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600, which scores 28,654 on average (0.1% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, which scores 28,591 (0.1% lower). This indicates that the 3700X is effectively tied with these parts in overall synthetic performance, but in real-world gaming, the Ryzen 5 5600XT’s newer architecture might offer better single-thread efficiency. For Fivem, the 3700X’s 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for handling the game’s background tasks, but the modest single-core boost clock of 4.40 GHz means that the CPU can become a limiting factor in crowded multiplayer areas where script execution is heavy. The benchmark data shows that at 4K Ultra, the FPS falls to 28.7, which is a steep decline from the 54 FPS at 4K Low, suggesting that the CPU is not the primary constraint at lower resolutions, but the GPU is stressed as resolution and settings increase.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 3700X and the Radeon RX 6600 ranks 1,421 out of 1,792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This rank is surprising given the individual component percentiles—the CPU is in the 85th percentile and the GPU in the 69th—but it reflects the specific demands of Fivem, which is not a typical AAA title. The game’s multiplayer nature means that performance can vary wildly based on server load, player count, and custom assets, and the measured data shows that this combo struggles to maintain high frame rates at higher settings.

The rank of 1,421 out of 1,792 means that roughly 79% of tested combos perform better in this specific game. This is a poor showing for a mid-range setup, and the data implies that Fivem is heavily dependent on single-thread CPU performance, where the 3700X is not a standout. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 890M, which has an average score of 25,246 (0% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 25,120 (0.5% lower). The RX 6600’s average benchmark score of 25,235 is competitive, but the combo’s low rank suggests that the pairing does not synergize well in Fivem. The CPU’s nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-12600 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, both score within 0.1% of the 3700X on average, yet the measured FPS data shows that this combo is not able to leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded strengths.

The rank also indicates that other combos with similar or even lower-tier GPUs achieve better results, likely due to having CPUs with higher single-core clocks. For instance, the Ryzen 5 5600XT has a similar average score but a newer architecture, which could translate to better per-core performance in Fivem’s script-heavy environment. The data suggests that the 3700X’s 8 cores are underutilized, as Fivem does not scale well across all 16 threads, and the GPU, while capable, is not the limiting factor at 1080p. This combination is a classic case where the sum is less than the parts, and the rank reflects that.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling trend from 1080p to 4K, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 146.7 FPS, which drops to 97.5 FPS at 1440p Low, and then to 54 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 63% drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU is handling the pixel load but is not severely constrained. At High settings, the drop is from 91.6 FPS at 1080p to 61.2 FPS at 1440p, and then to 30.9 FPS at 4K—a 66% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is more aggressive at Ultra settings, where 1080p yields 72.3 FPS, 1440p yields 45.6 FPS, and 4K yields 28.7 FPS, a 60% drop.

The pattern suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, as the FPS does not scale proportionally with resolution. For example, at Low settings, the jump from 1080p to 1440p results in a 33% FPS drop (from 146.7 to 97.5), but the pixel count increases by 78%. This indicates that the CPU is not able to feed the GPU enough frames at 1080p, and the GPU is waiting on the CPU. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as the FPS drops to 54 at Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The data implies that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates at Low and Medium settings, but it struggles at higher resolutions. At 1440p, the FPS at Medium settings (77.1) is playable, but at High settings (61.2), it is borderline, and at Ultra (45.6), it is not smooth. The resolution scaling analysis shows that the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the memory capacity and bandwidth are stretched, leading to lower frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 146.7 FPS on Low, 116.5 FPS on Medium, 91.6 FPS on High, and 72.3 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show a steady decline as settings increase, with a 50% drop from Low to Ultra. The 1080p Low score is the highest in the entire dataset, and it suggests that the CPU and GPU can handle the game’s load when graphical effects are minimized. At 1080p Medium, the FPS remains above 100, which is smooth for most displays, but at High, it drops below 100, and at Ultra, it falls to 72.3, which is still playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the FPS drops to 97.5 on Low, 77.1 on Medium, 61.2 on High, and 45.6 on Ultra. The 1440p Low score is still high enough for smooth gameplay, but the Medium score is below 80, and the High score is just above 60, which is the minimum for many gamers. The Ultra score of 45.6 is not playable for fast-paced multiplayer, as it would result in noticeable stuttering. At 3840x2160, the FPS falls to 54 on Low, 42.4 on Medium, 30.9 on High, and 28.7 on Ultra. These numbers are all below 60 FPS, and even the Low setting at 4K is not smooth. The 4K Ultra score of 28.7 is the lowest in the dataset, and it indicates that this combo is not suitable for 4K gaming in Fivem, as the GPU is overwhelmed.

The data shows that the best experience is at 1080p with Low or Medium settings, where the FPS is above 100. At 1440p, the Low setting is the only one that provides a consistently smooth experience, while at 4K, none of the settings are playable. The measured FPS breakdown highlights the importance of resolution and settings, and it suggests that users should prioritize lower resolutions to achieve higher frame rates.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU with 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It has a base clock of 1626 MHz, a boost clock of 2491 MHz, and a game clock of 2044 MHz. The GPU’s memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a mid-range GPU that is positioned in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 890M (0% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (0.5% lower score). The RX 6600’s average benchmark score of 25,235 is competitive, but its performance in Fivem is heavily influenced by the CPU pairing.

The GPU’s role in the measured FPS data becomes more prominent at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck, as the FPS is limited by the CPU’s single-thread performance. However, at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s rendering load increases, and its 8 GB of VRAM is put to the test. The memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU struggles to maintain frame rates. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 28.7, which is a clear sign of GPU limitation. The RX 6600’s boost clock of 2491 MHz is high, but the GPU’s 64 ROPs are not enough for 4K rendering at high settings.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which are all relevant for modern games like Fivem. The GPU’s pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s are decent for a mid-range card, but they are not sufficient for 4K gaming at high settings. The data suggests that the RX 6600 is best paired with a stronger CPU for 1080p gaming, but in this combo, the CPU is the weaker link at lower resolutions. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the 8 GB of VRAM is a potential issue for games with high-resolution textures. The GPU’s TDP of 132 W and suggested PSU of 300 W are modest, but they are not relevant to the performance analysis.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1080p is the best resolution, with 146.7 FPS on Low and 116.5 FPS on Medium. At 1440p, the FPS drops to 97.5 on Low, and at 4K, it falls to 54 on Low, which is not smooth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average score of 28,631, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-12600 (28,654) and 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28,591). These are effectively tied in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this combo?

A: At 1080p, the CPU is the bottleneck, as the FPS does not scale with resolution. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, with the FPS dropping to 28.7 on Ultra.

Q: What settings are recommended for 1080p gaming?

A: The data shows that Low settings yield 146.7 FPS, Medium yields 116.5 FPS, and High yields 91.6 FPS. For a 60 Hz monitor, High is sufficient, but for 144 Hz, Low or Medium is better.

Q: How does the GPU rank among all GPUs?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 is in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 25,235. It is closely matched with the AMD Radeon 890M (25,246) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (25,120).

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1,421 out of 1,792 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier. This is lower than expected given the individual component percentiles.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo is at 1080p with Low settings, which achieves 146.7 FPS. This is the only setting at any resolution that exceeds 140 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. For users with a 60 Hz display, the High setting at 1080p (91.6 FPS) is a better choice, as it offers improved visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The Medium setting at 1080p (116.5 FPS) is a good middle ground, providing a balance between visual fidelity and performance.

At 1440p, the Low setting (97.5 FPS) is the only one that provides a consistently smooth experience, while the Medium setting (77.1 FPS) is playable but not ideal for fast-paced multiplayer. The High setting at 1440p (61.2 FPS) is borderline, and the Ultra setting (45.6 FPS) is not recommended. At 4K, none of the settings are playable, with the highest FPS being 54 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that users should avoid 4K entirely with this combo and focus on 1080p for the best experience. The Ultra setting at 1080p (72.3 FPS) is the most visually demanding option that remains playable, but the drop from 116.5 FPS at Medium to 72.3 FPS at Ultra is significant, and the visual improvement may not justify the 38% performance loss. For competitive play, the Low setting at 1080p is the clear winner, as it maximizes frame rate and minimizes input lag.