Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a dataset for Fivem that shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. The measured frames per second (FPS) indicate a configuration that is capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p but becomes increasingly limited as resolution climbs. This analysis breaks down the recorded data, contextualizes the hardware’s standing among tested combos, and interprets the scaling behavior to identify the primary performance bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 175, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2138 out of 3707 total tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database (roughly the 42nd percentile).

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 31, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: Is there any measured data for minimum or maximum FPS at High settings?

A: No, the data for High settings at all three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) only includes average FPS values; min and max FPS are not reported.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 2070 SUPER in this configuration?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 3700X's multi-threaded benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260 on the average benchmark, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (score 34222) and 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4244P (score 34220).

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary driver of visual output in this Fivem configuration. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width provide a data path that is sufficient for the game's asset streaming at 1080p and 1440p, but the measured frame rates at 4K suggest the memory subsystem and processing power are under significant strain. The GPU's base clock of 1605 MHz and boost clock of 1770 MHz define its operating range, and the data shows a predictable decline in FPS as settings increase, indicating that the GPU's shading units (2560), TMUs (160), and ROPs (64) are being tasked progressively harder.

In the benchmark results, the GPU's average score of 20282 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (score 20480, 1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (score 20534, 1.2% faster), and the Intel Arc B570 (score 20556, 1.3% faster). This indicates the RTX 2070 SUPER is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not a top-tier part. The measured FPS data in Fivem reflects this: at 1080p, the GPU can push high frame rates, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 31 average FPS, showing that the 12 nm Turing chip is overextended at the highest load. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions, where texture and geometry data demand more throughput than the 256-bit bus can efficiently deliver.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear picture of which settings presets offer the most playable experience. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 175 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset drops to 138 average FPS, still very smooth, while High yields 111 average FPS. Ultra falls to 86 average FPS, which is playable but represents a significant step down. The data shows that the jump from Low to Medium costs 37 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 25 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 116 average FPS, which is a strong result for a 1440p panel. Medium drops to 91 average FPS, and High to 73 average FPS. Ultra falls to 57 average FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for many users. At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. Low yields 64 average FPS, Medium drops to 51, High to 40, and Ultra is nearly unplayable at 31 average FPS. The data indicates that for a balance of visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset is the sweet spot at both 1440p and 4K, offering 91 and 51 average FPS respectively. For competitive play at 1080p, Low or Medium provides the best frame rates, while Ultra is only viable at 1080p where it still maintains an 86 average FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data is organized by resolution and settings, revealing a consistent pattern. At 1920x1080, the frame rate ranges from a low of 86 average FPS on Ultra to a high of 175 average FPS on Low. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 118 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, with an average of 138. The High preset sits at 111 average FPS, with no min or max data recorded. The gap between Low and Ultra is 89 FPS, highlighting the substantial performance cost of higher graphical fidelity at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS values are predictably lower. Low settings produce 116 average FPS, Medium produces 91 (with a min of 77 and max of 105), High produces 73, and Ultra produces 57. The delta between Low and Ultra is 59 FPS. This resolution shows a smoother scaling curve, with each settings tier costing roughly 15-25 FPS. At 3840x2160, the performance drops sharply. Low settings average 64 FPS, Medium averages 51 (with a min of 43 and max of 58), High averages 40, and Ultra averages 31. The total range from Low to Ultra is 33 FPS, but the absolute values are much lower, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor. The data shows that moving from 1440p to 4K at the same settings (e.g., Medium) results in a 40 FPS drop, a substantial reduction that emphasizes the pixel count burden.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2138 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem. This places the configuration in the 57th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of systems but lags behind a significant portion of higher-end hardware. The ranking reflects the mid-range nature of both components. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 34260, sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, with a score of 20282, sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combined rank in Fivem is lower than the CPU's percentile, suggesting that the GPU is the more limiting factor in this specific game's workload.

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the Intel Core i5-13450HX (score 34333, 0.2% faster) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H (score 34083, 0.5% slower). The GPU's nearest rivals are all slightly faster, with the Intel Arc A750 (score 20582) being 1.5% faster than the RTX 2070 SUPER. This data indicates that the combo is balanced but not exceptional; it is a typical mid-range setup that handles Fivem adequately at lower resolutions but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra. The rank of 2138 out of 3707 suggests that many other combos achieve better performance, likely due to more powerful GPUs or newer CPU architectures.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, clocked at a base of 3.60 GHz and a boost of 4.40 GHz. In Fivem, a multiplayer game that often involves complex scripting and physics calculations, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is crucial. The benchmark data shows a Passmark multithread score of 22458 and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2092, indicating strong parallel processing capabilities. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache is also beneficial for handling the game's world data and player interactions.

However, the CPU's single-thread performance is comparatively weaker, with a Passmark single-thread score of 2656 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1593. This is relevant because Fivem's engine can be sensitive to single-core performance, especially in scenarios with many players or complex mods. The measured FPS data shows that at lower resolutions (1080p), the frame rates are high, suggesting that the CPU is keeping up with the GPU. At 4K, the frame rates drop dramatically, which typically indicates GPU limitation, but the CPU's single-thread scores suggest it could also be a bottleneck in certain scenes. The CPU's 65 W TDP and 7 nm process node (TSMC) make it an efficient part, but its architecture is older than newer Ryzen parts, which may impact its ability to feed the GPU at very high frame rates. The data shows a 175 average FPS at 1080p Low, which is a high bar, but not as high as newer CPUs might achieve in the same scenario.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 175 at 1920x1080 to 116 at 2560x1440, a 34% reduction, and then to 64 at 3840x2160, a further 45% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline as resolution increases is a classic sign of GPU limitation, as the RTX 2070 SUPER must process exponentially more pixels. At Medium settings, the drop is from 138 to 91 (34%) and then to 51 (44%), showing a consistent scaling pattern. At High settings, the drop is from 111 to 73 (34%) and then to 40 (45%), and at Ultra, it is from 86 to 57 (34%) and then to 31 (46%).

The consistent ~34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~45% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings indicates that the GPU's rendering throughput is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would not scale as predictably with resolution; instead, it would plateau at a certain frame rate regardless of pixel count. The data shows that the frame rate continues to decline steeply all the way to 4K, confirming that the RTX 2070 SUPER is saturated. The 8 GB of VRAM is also a factor at 4K Ultra, where the 31 average FPS suggests that memory capacity or bandwidth is insufficient for the highest texture loads. The scaling data points to a system where the GPU is the clear limiting component, and users aiming for higher frame rates at 1440p or 4K would need to reduce settings, as the CPU has headroom to handle more frames if the GPU could deliver them.