Fivem

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F posts an average benchmark score of 24,964, which places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911). It sits 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 5 210H (24,872).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti sits in the 25th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4,193. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R5 M330 (4,170, 0.6% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M (4,151, 1% slower), and the AMD Radeon Vega 3 (4,268, 1.8% faster).

Q: What is the measured FPS at 1080p with Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 62 FPS. This is the highest average FPS recorded across all resolution and settings combinations in the measured data.

Q: How much VRAM does the GTX 1050 Ti have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1752 MHz (7 Gbps effective).

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,964 across all tested workloads.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks 3,651 out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the bottom 1.5% of all tested configurations, indicating a severely imbalanced system for this title. The data shows that the GTX 1050 Ti is the dominant bottleneck; the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, as evidenced by the CPU's 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 25th percentile ranking.

The rank of 3,651 out of 3,707 means that 99.6% of tested combos deliver better Fivem performance. This is not a playable combination at higher resolutions or settings. The measured FPS data confirms this: even at 1080p Low, the combo only reaches an average of 62 FPS, while Ultra settings at 1080p drop to 30 FPS. At 4K, the best case is 22 FPS on Low settings, which falls below playable thresholds.

The disparity between the CPU and GPU performance tiers is stark. The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22,799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,218 in single-core, placing it in the top quarter of all CPUs. The GTX 1050 Ti, by contrast, scores only 6,340 in Passmark G3D, which is in the bottom quarter of all GPUs. This 52-percentage-point gap in percentiles explains why the combo ranks so poorly despite having a strong processor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the limiting component in this combo. Its 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM and 112.1 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for Fivem's demands at higher resolutions. The GPU's base clock is 1291 MHz with a boost clock of 1392 MHz, and it has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The pixel rate is 44.54 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 66.82 GTexel/s.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU's impact clearly. At 1080p, increasing from Low to Ultra drops the average FPS from 62 to 30, a reduction of 32 FPS. At 1440p, the same settings change drops from 41 to 20 FPS. At 4K, the drop is from 22 to 11 FPS. The GTX 1050 Ti's FP32 performance is 2.138 TFLOPS, which is modest by modern standards but consistent with its 14 nm Pascal architecture from 2016.

The GPU's 25th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon R5 M330 (0.6% slower) and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M (1% slower). It is 1.8% slower than the AMD Radeon Vega 3. This level of performance is fundamentally inadequate for smooth Fivem gameplay at 1440p or 4K, as the data shows averages below 41 FPS at 1440p and below 22 FPS at 4K across all settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on optimal settings. At 1920x1080, Low settings deliver an average of 62 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire dataset that achieves a consistently playable frame rate. Medium settings at 1080p yield 49 FPS average with a minimum of 41 FPS, which is borderline acceptable. High settings at 1080p drop to 39 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 30 FPS.

For 2560x1440, none of the settings achieve playable frame rates. Low settings average 41 FPS, Medium averages 32 FPS with a minimum of 27 FPS, High averages 26 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly poor: Low averages 22 FPS, Medium averages 18 FPS with a minimum of 15 FPS, High averages 14 FPS, and Ultra averages 11 FPS.

The data indicates that 1080p Low is the only viable configuration for this combo in Fivem. Medium at 1080p is marginally playable but risks dipping below 41 FPS in demanding scenes. Users seeking higher settings should consider this combo inadequate, as the GPU cannot maintain acceptable frame rates above 1080p Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results show a clear progression across settings. Low settings achieve an average of 62 FPS. Medium settings average 49 FPS, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS. High settings average 39 FPS. Ultra settings average 30 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 13 FPS, from Medium to High costs 10 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the averages are substantially lower. Low settings deliver 41 FPS average. Medium settings average 32 FPS, with a minimum of 27 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS. High settings average 26 FPS. Ultra settings average 20 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 21 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 22 FPS. Medium settings average 18 FPS, with a minimum of 15 FPS and a maximum of 20 FPS. High settings average 14 FPS. Ultra settings average 11 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 11 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated even at the lowest settings.

The data shows that the GTX 1050 Ti cannot scale effectively beyond 1080p. The jump from 1080p Low (62 FPS) to 1440p Low (41 FPS) represents a 34% drop. The jump from 1440p Low to 4K Low (22 FPS) is a further 46% drop. These reductions are consistent with a GPU that is heavily pixel-bound.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22,799 multi-core and 3,218 single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 12,362 multi-core and 2,374 single-core. The Passmark multi-thread score is 26,825 with a single-thread score of 3,841. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,902 (2 threads) to 6,379 (max threads), indicating good multi-threading efficiency.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking places it well above the GPU's 25th percentile. In Fivem, this means the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the CPU can easily feed the GPU, but the GTX 1050 Ti's 2.138 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps performance. The data shows that even with a powerful CPU, the GPU bottleneck prevents higher frame rates.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, 0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005, 0.2% faster), the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, 0.2% slower), and the Intel Core 5 210H (24,872, 0.4% slower). These margins are minimal, indicating the 7500F is competitively positioned among mid-range CPUs.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals how the combo scales across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the average is 62 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 41 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, it falls to 22 FPS, a further 46% reduction from 1440p. The total drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 65%.

The scaling pattern is similar across other settings. At Medium, the progression is 49 FPS (1080p) to 32 FPS (1440p) to 18 FPS (4K). At High, it is 39 FPS to 26 FPS to 14 FPS. At Ultra, it is 30 FPS to 20 FPS to 11 FPS. The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are 63% for Medium, 64% for High, and 63% for Ultra.

This scaling behavior indicates that the GTX 1050 Ti is the primary limiting component. The GPU's 112.1 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for higher resolutions. At 4K, even Low settings bottleneck at 22 FPS, suggesting the GPU is completely saturated. The CPU's contribution is minimal at these resolutions, as the Ryzen 5 7500F's 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient for Fivem's workload.

The data shows that the combo is only viable at 1080p. The 62 FPS at 1080p Low is the only measured configuration above 60 FPS. All other configurations fall below this threshold, with 1080p Medium (49 FPS) being the next best. For users with 1440p or 4K displays, this combo will not deliver acceptable performance in Fivem, as the GPU's compute and memory capabilities are fundamentally mismatched with the resolution demands.