Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1785th out of 1792 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the bottom 0.4% of all tested systems. This indicates a severely limited configuration for this title.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti scores 5316 on average, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce 930A (5317, 0% delta), 0.4% ahead of the GeForce 940M (5297), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 240 (5280). The Radeon R7 M445 scores 5361, 0.8% higher than the 1050 Ti.

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The best result is 59.5 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only setting level that approaches a playable 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 46 FPS, High to 35.4 FPS, and Ultra to 28.9 FPS.

Q: How much performance difference exists between 1080p and 4K for this combo?

A: At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 59.5 at 1080p to 40.6 at 1440p and then to 22.7 at 2160p. This represents a 61.8% drop from 1080p to 4K, showing that resolution scaling heavily impacts performance.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27220. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, scores 27043, which is only 0.7% lower.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti sits in the 30th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 5316. This low percentile explains why the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this configuration.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on the Pascal architecture using a 14 nm process from Samsung, with a die size of 132 mm² containing 3,300 million transistors. It operates with a base clock of 1291 MHz and a boost clock of 1392 MHz, while its 4 GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1752 MHz with a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 44.54 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 66.82 GTexel/s.

In Fivem, the data shows that this GPU's capabilities are the limiting factor for the entire system. The GPU's FP32 performance of 2.138 TFLOPS and its 30th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate that it is a low-end part by modern standards. Its nearest rivals in benchmark scores are all mobile or entry-level parts: the GeForce 930A (0% delta), GeForce 940M (0.4% ahead), and Radeon R7 240 (0.7% ahead). This positioning confirms that the 1050 Ti is at the bottom of the desktop discrete GPU hierarchy.

The VRAM capacity of 4 GB is relevant because Fivem is a multiplayer title that can be sensitive to texture memory. At 4K resolution with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 12.0, which is the lowest measured result across all configurations. The combination of high resolution and high settings likely pushes both VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth to their limits. The memory bandwidth of 112.1 GB/s is modest, and the 128-bit bus width restricts data throughput, which becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions where pixel throughput demands increase significantly.

The clock speeds of 1291 MHz base and 1392 MHz boost are relatively low for a desktop GPU, and they directly impact the fill rates. The pixel rate of 44.54 GPixel/s and texture rate of 66.82 GTexel/s are the hardware limits that the measured FPS results reflect. In this pairing, the Ryzen 7 5700's substantial compute potential — with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 — sits largely unused because the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough to utilize the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution scaling that identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS progresses from 59.5 at 1920x1080, down to 40.6 at 2560x1440, and further to 22.7 at 3840x2160. This represents a 31.8% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and an additional 44.1% drop from 1440p to 4K. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 61.8%, which aligns with the pixel count increase of 4x, indicating that the GPU is fully saturated by pixel throughput.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar: 46.0 FPS at 1080p, 34.2 FPS at 1440p, and 19.3 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 25.7%, and from 1440p to 4K is 43.6%. The High settings row shows 35.4 FPS at 1080p, 25.3 FPS at 1440p, and 13.6 FPS at 4K — a 28.5% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 46.2% drop to 4K. The Ultra settings show the steepest relative decline: 28.9 FPS at 1080p, 19.3 FPS at 1440p, and 12.0 FPS at 4K.

The consistent pattern across all settings levels — where the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is always larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p — indicates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being exhausted as resolution increases. The GTX 1050 Ti's 112.1 GB/s memory bandwidth and 44.54 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for 4K workloads in this game. The data does not show any scenario where the CPU becomes the limiting factor; even at 1080p Low, the 59.5 FPS result is far below what the Ryzen 7 5700's single-thread score of 2916 in Cinebench R23 would suggest the CPU can handle.

# Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy of playability across the four settings presets. At 1920x1080, which is the most common gaming resolution, Low settings produce an average of 59.5 FPS, which is the only configuration that reaches a smooth 60 FPS level. Medium settings yield 46.0 FPS, which is still playable but with noticeable dips. High settings drop to 35.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28.9 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 13.5 FPS (a 22.7% reduction), while the step from Medium to High costs another 10.6 FPS (a 23% reduction). The jump from High to Ultra costs 6.5 FPS (an 18.4% reduction).

At 2560x1440, the situation degrades significantly. Low settings produce 40.6 FPS, which is marginal for playable multiplayer gameplay. Medium settings drop to 34.2 FPS, High to 25.3 FPS, and Ultra to 19.3 FPS. None of these results reach a 60 FPS threshold, and even 30 FPS is only achievable at Low or Medium settings. At 3840x2160, all results are below 23 FPS: Low yields 22.7 FPS, Medium 19.3 FPS, High 13.6 FPS, and Ultra 12.0 FPS. These are all well below the minimum threshold for acceptable multiplayer performance.

The data indicates that the best experience for this combination is at 1080p with Low settings, as it is the only configuration that approaches the 60 FPS target. If visual quality is prioritized over frame rate, Medium settings at 1080p provide a compromise at 46.0 FPS, but the trade-off is substantial. At 1440p or higher, no settings preset delivers an adequate frame rate for a smooth multiplayer experience. The pattern across all resolutions shows that each settings tier costs approximately 20-25% performance, and the GPU lacks the headroom to absorb those costs at higher resolutions.

# How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks 1785th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 0.4% of all systems tested for this game. This ranking is driven almost entirely by the GPU's low performance ceiling. The CPU, by contrast, is a strong component: the Ryzen 7 5700 scores in the 84th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 27220. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9900K (27043, 0.7% lower), the Intel Core i7-12700H (27006, 0.8% lower), the Intel Core i7-1370P (26991, 0.8% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (26909, 1.2% lower). This means the CPU is within 1.2% of several high-end desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU, however, sits in the 30th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 5316. Its nearest rivals are all low-end parts, with the GeForce 930A matching its score exactly (0% delta), the GeForce 940M 0.4% behind, and the Radeon R7 240 0.7% behind. The Radeon R7 M445 is 0.8% ahead. This massive discrepancy between the CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 30th percentile creates a severe bottleneck that explains the combo's poor ranking. The system is effectively a high-end CPU paired with an entry-level GPU, and in Fivem — a multiplayer title that stresses both CPU and GPU — the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The ranking of 1785 out of 1792 indicates that almost every other tested combination delivers better performance in this game. This is not a case of marginal differences; the bottom 0.4% positioning reflects a fundamental hardware mismatch. The data suggests that even pairing the Ryzen 7 5700 with a modestly better GPU would yield dramatic improvements, as the CPU has ample headroom to drive higher frame rates.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, producing twelve distinct configurations. At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly poor: Ultra settings average 12.0 FPS, High settings average 13.6 FPS, Medium settings average 19.3 FPS, and Low settings average 22.7 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 10.7 FPS, meaning that even dropping from Ultra to Low only recovers a 47% performance increase. The 4K results confirm that this GPU is not viable at this resolution for Fivem under any settings.

At 2560x1440, the results improve but remain below playable thresholds for most presets. Low settings average 40.6 FPS, which is the best 1440p result. Medium settings average 34.2 FPS, High settings average 25.3 FPS, and Ultra settings average 19.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 6.4 FPS (15.8%), from Medium to High is 8.9 FPS (26%), and from High to Ultra is 6.0 FPS (23.7%). This resolution is only viable at Low settings, and even then the average of 40.6 FPS leaves little margin for frame drops in multiplayer scenarios.

At 1920x1080, the results are the most playable. Low settings average 59.5 FPS, which is the only measured configuration that reaches a 60 FPS level. Medium settings average 46.0 FPS, High settings average 35.4 FPS, and Ultra settings average 28.9 FPS. The progression from Low to Medium costs 13.5 FPS (22.7%), from Medium to High costs 10.6 FPS (23%), and from High to Ultra costs 6.5 FPS (18.4%). The 1080p results show a consistent pattern where each settings tier costs roughly one-fifth to one-quarter of the remaining performance.

Comparing across resolutions at the same settings reveals the GPU's scaling limits. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 59.5 at 1080p to 40.6 at 1440p (a 31.8% reduction) and to 22.7 at 4K (a 61.8% reduction from 1080p). At Medium settings, the values are 46.0, 34.2, and 19.3, respectively. At High settings, the values are 35.4, 25.3, and 13.6. At Ultra settings, the values are 28.9, 19.3, and 12.0. The data shows that the gap between 1440p and 4K is consistently larger than the gap between 1080p and 1440p, which reflects the GPU's memory bandwidth limitation becoming more pronounced as resolution increases.