Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a lopsided pairing: a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with a 77th-percentile average benchmark score (25005) sits next to a 2016-era GPU that lands in the 25th percentile (average 4193). The measured Fivem result is accordingly clamp at both ends—62 FPS at 1080p Low and 11 FPS at 4K Ultra—placing this combo at rank 3651 out of 3707 tested configurations. The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU dictates performance, while the CPU is rarely engaged at high resolutions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 8400F brings six cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Built on TSMC's 4 nm process, it operates within a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory (dual-channel, 83.2 GB/s bandwidth). Its cache layout includes 1 MB L2 per core and a 16 MB shared L3. On synthetic benchmarks, the CPU averages 25005 points, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964) and 0.4% below the EPYC 9474F (25103), according to the nearest rivals list. The most telling numbers for multiplayer gaming are Cinebench R23 single- and multi-thread scores: 2943 and 20851, respectively. The 1080p frame rates in Fivem, however, do not rise linearly with such CPU headroom.

In this game, the CPU appears to side with the upper tier of the tested configuration. At 1080p Low, the CPU delivers 62 FPS average—a level that suggests the processor is not the limiting factor, since the same part can score 20851 in Cinebench multi-thread. The drop to 62 FPS at 1080p Low versus 49 FPS at Medium and 39 FPS at High is more attributable to the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth. The CPU’s percentile stands at 77, meaning it outranks most desktop processors, while the GPU's is at 25 of the range. In terms of multi-thread capabilities, the CPU shows 6099 points in 3DMark max-threads, and its PassMark multithread score of 24389 confirms a healthy core count for any parallel workloads in this type of simulated multiplayer environment.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The GTX 1050 Ti packs a 4 GB GDDR5 frame buffer on a 128-bit bus, delivering 112.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The chip runs at a base clock of 1291 MHz and a boost of 1392 MHz, with memory at an effective 7 Gbps. The number of shading units is 768, texture units 48, and ROPs 32. In raw throughput terms, the GPU achieves 2.138 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 44.54 GPixel/s. Design-wise, it has a 75 W TDP and no external power connectors, but the measured FPS in Fivem reflect its mid-range classification.

The data set shows that the GPU quickly becomes overwhelmed. At 1080p, the lowest preset scores 62 FPS, but already at Medium the average drops to 49 FPS, and at Ultra it is 30 FPS. At 1440p Low, the FPS halves to 20 FPS, while Ultra yields 20 FPS, and at 4K the numbers fall to 22 for Low and 11 for Ultra. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-quality textures at higher resolutions, but the bottleneck is more about raw shading capacity—2.138 TFLOPS is far below the CPU’s relative strength. The GPU’s nearest rivals in the benchmark list are all slow parts: the Radeon R5 M330 is 0.6% higher, and the Quadro K3000M is 1.8% faster, so the 1050 Ti is buried in the low-end ephemeris. The combination of low fill rate and modest memory bandwidth aligns with the observed steep FPS decline.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the overall ranking for Fivem, the combo lands at position 3651 out of 3707 tested combinations. This puts it in the bottom 4th percentile (since 3707-3651=56 combos are worse). The CPU performs far better than its GPU counterpart: the CPU holds the 77th percentile, while the GPU only the 25th percentile. The gap suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios; it has enough headroom to drive higher frame rates if the GPU could keep up. The benchmark average CPU score is 25005, which sits within a few points of its closest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (0.2% slower), Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4% faster), and AMD EPYC 9474F (-0.4% from the CPU). Meanwhile, the GPU average backlog is 4193, and its closest competitors are even weaker parts (Radeon R5 M330 are 0.6% ahead, but they are also low-performance parts). Thus the rank 3651 is dominated by the GPU's limitations, not the CPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table draws exclusively from the measurement rows:

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Min/Max (if provided) |

|------------|----------|------------|-----------------------|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 62 | – |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 49 | 41 / 56 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 39 | – |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 30 | – |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 41 | – |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 32 | 27 / 37 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 26 | – |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 20 | – |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 22 | – |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 18 | 15 / 20 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 14 | – |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 11 | – |

Each setting increment at a fixed resolution lowers the FPS roughly 15–30%. At 1080p, Medium maintains a comfortable average of 49 with minimum 41 FPS, while Ultra still delivers 31 average. At 1440p, only the Low (41) goes above 30 FPS; Medium and High fall to 32 and 26, respectively. At 4K, all values are below 22, with the highest Low hitting only 22 average. The data shows that the FPS drop is not proportional to the pixel count: 1080p to 4K multiplicatively increases pixels by 4.5, but the frame drafts near linear: Low average 62 at 1080p to 22 at 4K is a factor ~2.8, and Ultra 30 to 11 is ~2.7. This indicates that the game is increasingly constrained by the GPU's fixed properties, not the pixel count.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 62, reached at 1080p with Low settings. At Medium 1080p the average is 49 FPS with a minimum of 41.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare with its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24964) and 0.3% below the EPYC 9474F (25103), based on the nearest rivals list.

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?

A: Only at the Low preset does the average FPS match 62. The Medium preset yields 49 average and a minimum of 41, so a stable 60 FPS is not guaranteed at Medium or higher settings.

Q: What is the impact of resolution on FPS when using Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra average is 30 FPS, 1440p Ultra is 20 FPS, and 4K Ultra is 11 FPS. That means a 4K Ultra drop to 11 is a 63% reduction from 1080p Ultra.

Q: Does the combo’s rank reflect the CPU or the GPU more?

A: The CPU is in the 77th percentile, while the GPU is in the 25th percentile. The GPU is the limiting component, as seen by the strong FPS at low settings but a narrow drop at higher settings, and the combo rank (3651 of 3707) is more aligned with the GPU's low standing.

Q: Are there large frame-time variations?

A: The only measurements given are for the Medium preset: at 1080p Medium the FPS ranges from 41 to 56, at 1440p from 27 to 37, and at 4K from 15 to 20. That shows a small spread, so frame pacing is relatively consistent, but the averages themselves are low.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience

Given a target of smooth motion without undecors, the most balanced measured configuration is 1080p Medium: it delivers a 49 average with a minimum of 41, and the Maximum is 56. This gives substantial headroom over the 30 FPS of Ultra. If the user strictly wants high frame rates, 1080p Low yields the only 62 FPS measurement. At 1440p, only the Low settings keep the average above 40, so that the only “playable†option at that resolution is Low. Ultra at any resolution is not advisable: even at 1080p it only hits 30 average, while at 1440p it dips to 20 and 4K to 11. The data suggests that for a smooth frame rate the player should stay at 1080p and choose Low or Medium, with Medium giving the best balance of visual impact and No frame drop.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

From the measured rows, the average FPS for each preset varies with resolution. At Low, 62 at 1080p, 41 at 1440p, and 22 at 4K. For Medium, 49, 32, and 18. High: 39, 26, and 14. Ultra: 30, 20, and 11. The ratio from 1080p to 4K for any setting is roughly 2.8 to 2.7, which is less than the 4x pixel count increase. Because the CPU is not being used to the full potential at higher resolutions (since both the frame rates behave similarly across resolutions), the degradation points strongly to the GPU, especially its shader and bandwidth. The CPU’s 77th percentile indicates it has spare capacity; indeed, 2000 could run a higher FPS if the GPU were not stuck below its base clock. The CPU score in a single-thread test (2943 in Cinebench R23) also shows that the game's single-threaded load is not the bottleneck. Therefore, the 1050 Ti is the controlling factor, and any resolution or setting that increases pixel output or shading work will throw off the frame rate proportionally. The results make clear that the Ryzen 5 8400F would pair best with a far more powerful GPU, while the GTX 1050 Ti pulls the entire combination to the bottom percentile of tested hardware.