Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a wide performance band across Fivem, with the measured results clearly illustrating where the bottleneck shifts as resolution and settings change. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo delivers 177.8 FPS, but this drops to 40.5 FPS at 3840x2160 on High settings, a reduction of over 77% that points directly to the graphics card becoming the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. The data shows a methodical progression: at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates well beyond 100 FPS at most settings, while at 4K, even Medium settings only reach 50.5 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound curve. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS falls from 109 to 74.4, a 31.7% decline. Continuing to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 40.5, which is another 45.6% reduction from the 1440p figure. This pattern holds across all settings presets, though the absolute drops are more severe at the highest quality levels. At Ultra settings, the combo goes from 83.6 FPS at 1080p to 55.5 FPS at 1440p and then to 28.7 FPS at 4K, meaning the 4K result is less than a third of the 1080p performance.

The scaling behavior indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary constraint above 1080p. Consider the Low settings row: 177.8 FPS at 1080p drops to 115.1 FPS at 1440p, a 35.3% reduction, and then to 62.8 FPS at 4K, a 45.4% reduction from 1440p. The consistency of these percentage drops across different quality presets suggests the GPU's pixel throughput is the ceiling. The RTX 2070 SUPER has a pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s, and at 4K resolution the sheer number of pixels being processed overwhelms these capabilities. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 3 architecture, appears to have sufficient headroom at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS drops track closely with the increase in pixel count rather than showing signs of CPU stalls.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested configurations for Fivem, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 1087 out of 1792 total combos. This places it in the 60.7th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 39% of configurations deliver better average performance in this game. The rank reflects the balanced but middle-tier nature of the pairing: the RTX 2070 SUPER sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600G achieves the 78th percentile among all CPUs. The combo ranking is slightly lower than either component's individual percentile, suggesting that Fivem's performance characteristics do not fully leverage the CPU's relative strength.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 22006, which is 0.9% higher than the RTX 2070 SUPER's 22206, while the NVIDIA RTX A400 scores 22307, a 0.5% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 trails by 2.5% with a score of 21670. These margins are small, indicating that the RTX 2070 SUPER is positioned in a tightly contested performance band. For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-11600H scores 19949, just 0.2% below the Ryzen 5 5600G's average benchmark score of 19983, while the AMD EPYC 7713P and Intel Core i7-11800H both score 20024, a 0.2% advantage over the 5600G. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX scores 19928, 0.3% lower. This tight clustering means that in Fivem, the combo's rank is more influenced by the game's specific engine demands than by raw compute differences between near-identical performers.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 177.8, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 62.8 on Low settings down to 28.7 on Ultra settings, with High settings producing 40.5 FPS and Medium producing 50.5 FPS.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600G or the RTX 2070 SUPER the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the data shows the GPU is likely the limiter at higher settings, as the average FPS drops from 177.8 on Low to 83.6 on Ultra, a 52.9% reduction that aligns with increased graphical load rather than CPU constraints.

Q: What settings preset provides the most balanced experience at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings deliver 92.8 FPS, which is over 60% higher than the 55.5 FPS seen on Ultra, while still maintaining a substantial improvement over Low's 115.1 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER scores 22206 in average benchmark score, which is 0.9% higher than the GTX TITAN Z's 22006 and 2.5% higher than the RX 5700's 21670, but 0.5% lower than the RTX A400's 22307.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested configurations for this game?

A: The combination ranks 1087 out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the upper 39% of all configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 177.8 FPS on Low, 139.5 FPS on Medium, 109 FPS on High, and 83.6 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 52.9% reduction in frame rate, with each step up in quality costing between 22% and 27% of the previous setting's performance. At 2560x1440, the averages are 115.1 FPS on Low, 92.8 FPS on Medium, 74.4 FPS on High, and 55.5 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 51.8%, nearly identical to the 1080p scaling, which again points to GPU-bound behavior. The 1440p results show that the combo can maintain playable frame rates even at Ultra, though the 55.5 FPS figure is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider ideal.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. Low settings produce 62.8 FPS, which is the only 4K preset that exceeds 60 FPS. Medium settings drop to 50.5 FPS, High settings to 40.5 FPS, and Ultra settings to 28.7 FPS. The Ultra result at 4K is less than half the 1080p Low result, illustrating the substantial cost of rendering at 4K with this GPU. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a consistent 45% to 48% reduction across all settings, which aligns with the pixel count increase from 3.7 million to 8.3 million pixels. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not recorded in the data, so only the averages are available for analysis.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G brings 6 cores and 12 threads to this pairing, running at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process, includes 16 MB of L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel access. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 16758 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2365 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 19717. These figures place the 5600G at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a solid mid-range performer. For Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework for a game released in 2017, the CPU's single-thread performance is particularly relevant. The 3dmark single-thread score of 872 and PassMark single-thread score of 3177 suggest adequate headroom for game logic and physics calculations.

The measured FPS data does not show obvious signs of CPU limitation. At 1080p Low settings, the 177.8 FPS result is likely near the engine's threading ceiling, but the consistent scaling across settings and resolutions indicates the GPU is the primary constraint in most scenarios. The CPU's 65W TDP and 7 nm process node make it an efficient choice, and its integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are not relevant in this discrete GPU configuration. The 5600G's nearest rivals in the benchmark database, such as the Intel Core i7-11600H with a 0.2% higher score, show that the CPU's performance is well understood and predictable. In Fivem's multiplayer environments, where many entities and scripts can tax the CPU, the 6-core/12-thread configuration provides a reasonable balance, though the data does not isolate CPU-specific bottlenecks at the tested settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 109 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and only 21.8% lower than the 139.5 FPS seen on Medium. Given that High is only 22% slower than Medium but offers visibly better graphical quality, it represents the best balance for most users at 1080p. The Ultra preset at 83.6 FPS is still playable, but the additional quality gain over High may not justify the 23.3% performance cost for competitive multiplayer scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 92.8 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides a substantial improvement over High's 74.4 FPS while maintaining a frame rate above 90, which is smooth for most displays. The Low preset at 115.1 FPS is available for users prioritizing maximum responsiveness, but the visual compromise is significant. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset at 62.8 FPS clears the 60 FPS bar, making it the only viable option for 4K gaming with this combo. The Medium preset at 50.5 FPS may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but High and Ultra at 40.5 and 28.7 FPS respectively are likely too choppy for an enjoyable experience. For users with 4K displays, the data suggests either dropping to 1440p or accepting Low settings to maintain playable performance.