Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti pairing in Fivem delivers a performance profile that is heavily dictated by the CPU’s six Zen 2 cores, which cap the otherwise powerful GPU at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. The CPU’s 3.70 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clocks, combined with 12 threads and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, provide the foundation for the game’s simulation logic and entity streaming. Its benchmark standing is solid, sitting at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17489. The data indicates that this processor is not a weak link in general compute, but in Fivem’s multiplayer environment, its single-thread performance—evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 726—becomes the primary constraint when the GPU is not fully engaged. The 4600G is a 65 W part built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, supporting DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, which is adequate for feeding the GPU, but it lacks the newer PCIe Gen 4 interface, using Gen 3 with 20 lanes instead.

The RTX 4070 Ti, by contrast, is an Ada Lovelace architecture GPU with a 2310 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost clock, and it is the dominant factor at higher resolutions. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Fivem’s texture-heavy scenes. The GPU’s 7680 shading units and 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute place it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44900. In this combo, the GPU’s role becomes apparent only when the resolution increases and the CPU’s frame-generation limit is no longer the bottleneck. The RTX 4070 Ti’s closest rivals in the database include the RTX 5090 Mobile (with a deltaPct of -0.6) and the Intel Arc A730M (deltaPct of -1.5), showing it sits near the top of the performance range, yet the measured frame rates in Fivem reveal that this potential is often left untapped by the 4600G.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 4600G’s six cores and 12 threads are the defining limitation in this pairing, particularly at 1080p where the CPU must keep up with the GPU’s output. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 231.5 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this build, but it is only a 21.2% increase over the High preset’s 190.9 FPS. This modest scaling when the GPU load is reduced indicates that the CPU is approaching its ceiling; the 4600G’s Zen 2 architecture, while capable of a 13,593 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, does not have the single-core headroom to push much beyond 230 FPS in this title. The processor’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1430 and 4-thread score of 2732 further illustrate that its strength is in multi-threaded tasks, but Fivem’s primary game thread is not fully utilizing all 12 threads. Consequently, the data shows that while the CPU is ranked at the 75th percentile overall, its percentile in gaming scenarios like this is effectively lower because the GPU is waiting on it.

The CPU’s thermal and power characteristics—65 W TDP and a 7 nm process—do not cause throttling that would further reduce performance, but the lack of a larger L3 cache (8 MB shared) compared to newer chips may hurt in crowded multiplayer areas where asset streaming is frequent. The 4600G’s integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics is irrelevant here since a discrete GPU is present, but its presence does not detract from CPU performance. In the nearest rival comparison, the 4600G is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (deltaPct of 0) and Intel Core i5-12450H (deltaPct of 0.1), and it is 1% behind the Intel Core i3-13100F. This indicates that in a raw benchmark sense, the CPU is not a standout, and in Fivem, its 4.20 GHz boost clock is not enough to overcome the GPU’s capability at lower resolutions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4070 Ti’s 12 GB of VRAM is never a limiting factor in any of the measured settings, as Fivem’s texture demands at 4K Ultra are still within that capacity. The GPU’s 2610 MHz boost clock and 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth allow it to scale effectively with resolution, but only when the CPU permits. At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 51.8 FPS, which is a 64% reduction from 1080p Ultra’s 146.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is finally the bottleneck at that resolution. The GPU’s 80 ROPs and 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient for the game’s draw calls, but the frame rate at 4K Ultra is below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that the RTX 4070 Ti is not overkill for this title at maximum settings. The GPU’s benchmark percentile of 85 and its performance relative to rivals—being 0.6% slower than the RTX 5090 Mobile and 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 580—confirm that it is a high-end part, yet in this combo, it is often idle.

At 1440p High, the combo produces 128.8 FPS, which is a 32.5% drop from 1080p High’s 190.9 FPS, showing that the GPU is starting to take over the workload. The VRAM bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is crucial here, as Fivem’s open-world streaming requires rapid texture loading, and the GDDR6X memory handles this without stutter. The GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is wasted at 1080p Low, where the frame rate is 231.5 FPS, because the CPU is issuing draw calls faster than the game’s logic can process. The RTX 4070 Ti’s role is to provide headroom for higher resolutions and settings, but the data shows that in this combo, the GPU is only fully utilized at 4K, where it still cannot reach 60 FPS on Ultra, indicating that a stronger CPU would not help at that resolution.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frame rates reveal a clear scaling pattern: from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by about 33% across all settings, while from 1440p to 4K, the drop is much steeper, averaging 45%. This is textbook behavior for a CPU-bound system at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 231.5 FPS, and at 1440p Low it drops to 201.3 FPS, a 13% reduction, which is small relative to the resolution increase. This suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, because the GPU has ample headroom to render at higher resolutions without a proportional FPS penalty. However, at 4K Low, the FPS falls to 111.2, a 44.8% drop from 1440p Low, indicating that the GPU is now the bottleneck. The transition point is between 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s pixel throughput and memory bandwidth become stressed.

For High settings, the pattern is similar: 1080p High yields 190.9 FPS, 1440p High yields 128.8 FPS (a 32.6% drop), and 4K High yields 70.6 FPS (a 45.2% drop from 1440p). This shows that as settings increase, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions, but the CPU still caps the maximum frame rate at 1080p. The Ultra preset is the most telling: 1080p Ultra is 146.8 FPS, 1440p Ultra is 95.9 FPS (34.7% drop), and 4K Ultra is 51.8 FPS (46% drop). At 4K Ultra, the FPS is below 60, confirming that the RTX 4070 Ti is not sufficient for max settings at this resolution in Fivem, and the CPU is not the issue there. The scaling data indicates that for a 1440p monitor, this combo is well-balanced, but for 1080p high-refresh displays, the CPU limits the experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 231.5 FPS on Low, 213.4 FPS on Medium, 190.9 FPS on High, and 146.8 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 84.7 FPS, a 36.6% reduction, which is moderate and indicates that the GPU is still handling the extra graphical load without collapsing. At 2560x1440, the numbers are 201.3 FPS on Low, 161 FPS on Medium, 128.8 FPS on High, and 95.9 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra here is 105.4 FPS (52.4%), showing that the GPU is more stressed at this resolution. At 3840x2160, the performance is 111.2 FPS on Low, 85.3 FPS on Medium, 70.6 FPS on High, and 51.8 FPS on Ultra. The Low to Ultra drop is 59.4 FPS (53.4%), but the absolute numbers are much lower, with only Low and Medium exceeding 60 FPS.

The data shows that the Medium preset at 1440p (161 FPS) and High at 1080p (190.9 FPS) are the sweet spots for high refresh rates. At 4K, only Low (111.2 FPS) and Medium (85.3 FPS) are playable, with High at 70.6 FPS being borderline and Ultra at 51.8 FPS below the 60 FPS target. The 1080p Medium score of 213.4 FPS is the second highest overall, trailing only 1080p Low, which suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at Medium settings, but the Ultra preset at 1080p (146.8 FPS) is still above 144 FPS, making it viable for high-refresh panels. For 1440p, High at 128.8 FPS is above 120 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz monitors, while Ultra at 95.9 FPS is still playable but not optimal for esports-level responsiveness. The measured FPS values are consistent with the interpretation that the CPU is the limiter at 1080p, while the GPU is the limiter at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 326th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 18.2% of all systems. This rank is surprisingly high given the CPU’s modest performance, but it reflects the fact that the RTX 4070 Ti can carry the system at higher resolutions where the CPU is less relevant. The rank indicates that while the CPU is a bottleneck at 1080p, the overall experience across all resolutions is above average. Compared to other combos, this system outperforms the majority, but it is not in the top tier, which would require a more balanced CPU like a Ryzen 7 or Core i7. The 4600G’s nearest CPU rivals, such as the Intel Core i3-13100F (which is 1% faster in average benchmark score), would likely yield a better rank in this game due to superior single-thread performance, but the data does not provide those specific combo rankings.

The GPU’s percentile of 85 and its average benchmark score of 44900 suggest that it is the primary driver of this rank, as many combos with weaker GPUs will fall below this system despite having better CPUs. The rank of 326 out of 1792 means that 1466 other combos are slower, which is a strong showing for a CPU that was originally a budget part with integrated graphics. However, the data also shows that the combo’s rank would improve significantly if the CPU were replaced with a higher-clocked model, as the FPS at 1080p would increase. The combo rank is a holistic measure, and the fact that it is in the top 20% despite the CPU limitation confirms the RTX 4070 Ti’s raw power at 4K, where it still delivers playable frame rates at High settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 231.5, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, at 4K with Medium settings it averages 85.3 FPS, and at High settings it averages 70.6 FPS, both above 60 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 51.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the 45% FPS drop from 1440p to 4K, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is only 33%, indicating the CPU is less limiting.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 4600G compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-13100F?

A: The 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17489, which is 1% lower than the Core i3-13100F’s score of 17665, as indicated by the deltaPct of -1.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested systems in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 326th out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the top 18.2% of all systems.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti’s 12 GB VRAM cause any issues at 4K Ultra?

A: The data shows no VRAM-related stutters or issues, as the 12 GB capacity is sufficient for the game’s textures, but the GPU’s compute power is insufficient for 60 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

For a 1080p display with a high refresh rate (144Hz or higher), the High preset at 190.9 FPS is the best balance, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium (213.4 FPS) while still exceeding 144 FPS. The Ultra preset at 146.8 FPS is also viable for 144Hz panels, but the 44 FPS drop from High to Ultra may not justify the visual gains. For 1440p, the High preset at 128.8 FPS is recommended for 120Hz or 144Hz monitors, while the Medium preset at 161 FPS is better for 165Hz displays, as it maintains a higher frame rate with minimal visual compromise. The Ultra preset at 95.9 FPS is only suitable for 60Hz or 100Hz displays. For 4K, the Medium preset at 85.3 FPS is the best choice for a 60Hz monitor, as it stays well above the threshold, while High at 70.6 FPS is also playable but with a 17% FPS penalty. Low settings at 4K (111.2 FPS) are unnecessary unless aiming for 100Hz+ on a 4K panel, but the visual quality loss is severe. Overall, the data suggests that the High preset at 1440p provides the best experience, combining strong visual fidelity with a 128.8 FPS average that is smooth on most displays.