Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 lands at position 1020 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top 27.5 percent of all recorded combos. That rank reflects a system built around a mid-range CPU from 2020 and a high-end GPU from 2023, and the data shows the pairing is far more capable at 1080p than at 4K. The combo outperforms roughly 72 percent of all tested setups in this specific multiplayer title, which is respectable given the CPU's age and the game's known sensitivity to single-thread performance.

The Ryzen 5 4600G's benchmark percentile sits at 71 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17507. Its nearest rivals in the CPU database are the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE at 17482 (0.1 percent faster), the Intel Core 7 150U at 17395 (0.6 percent slower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE at 17614 (0.6 percent slower in the opposite direction). These are marginal differences, meaning the 4600G is essentially in a dead heat with several modern low-power chips despite being several generations old. The Intel Core i3-14100T sits just 0.8 percent ahead, which underscores that the 4600G's Zen 2 architecture still holds its own in synthetic CPU workloads.

For the GPU, the RTX 4070 posts an average benchmark score of 37648, with a percentile of 81 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37628 (0.1 percent faster), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37507 (0.4 percent slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 (1.3 percent faster). The delta between the RTX 4070 and the RTX 4080 Mobile is small enough that in Fivem specifically, the desktop card's higher sustained clocks may matter more than raw compute differences.

The combo's overall rank in Fivem is not defined by GPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions; rather, the data suggests the CPU becomes the limiting factor as frame rates climb past 150 FPS. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 233 FPS average, which is close to what the CPU can feed, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 47 FPS, a figure that aligns with GPU saturation. The rank of 1020 out of 3707 is thus a blend of strong GPU headroom and modest CPU throughput, with the final score depending heavily on resolution and preset.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the AD104 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across 294 mm², with a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The card ships with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 1313 MHz base with 21 Gbps effective speed, while the GPU core operates at 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost.

The shader configuration includes 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 46 dedicated RT cores, and 184 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. Pixel fill rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, texture fill rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, and the card achieves 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). The card is rated at 200 W TDP with a dual-slot cooler, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and the manufacturer suggests a 550 W power supply. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The card measures 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

In Fivem, the GPU's role is most apparent at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 delivers 60 FPS on High, 75 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 64 and maximum of 86), 95 FPS on Low, and 47 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 48 FPS, a 102 percent increase, which shows the card's scaling with preset quality. The 12 GB VRAM buffer is ample for Fivem's typically modest texture demands, even at 4K, so memory capacity is not a bottleneck in these measurements.

At 2560x1440, the GPU still carries significant load: 108 FPS on High, 135 FPS on Medium (min 115, max 156), 171 FPS on Low, and 84 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p Ultra result is 27 FPS lower than 1440p High, indicating that Ultra settings impose a heavy cost on the shading units. At 1920x1080, the GPU becomes less dominant: 164 FPS on High, 205 FPS on Medium (min 175, max 236), 233 FPS on Low, and 128 FPS on Ultra. The 1080p Low result of 233 FPS is the highest recorded average for this combo, and it suggests the CPU is nearing its limit.

The GPU's benchmark results reinforce this picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3854; in Geekbench OpenCL, 154858; and in Geekbench Vulkan, 174152. Passmark G3D gives 26927, while GPU compute yields 14720. The DirectX 10 score of 139, DirectX 11 of 244, and DirectX 12 of 103 are lower-level API tests that show the card's strengths are in modern workloads. The percentiles and rival deltas place the RTX 4070 slightly above the RX Vega 56 and just below the RTX 4080 Mobile, but in Fivem's specific rendering path, the card's raw rasterization power translates directly to the FPS numbers seen above.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 4000 series, based on the Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. Base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost of 4.20 GHz, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 in dual-channel configuration, with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU features PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, though this combo relies on the discrete GPU. It has an unlocked multiplier, and its launch MSRP was $154.

The CPU's synthetic benchmarks show a balanced profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13593 multi-core and 1919 single-core; in R20, 5709 multi-core and 805 single-core; and in R15, 1370 multi-core and 193 single-core. Geekbench gives 6637 multi-core and 1460 single-core. 3DMark results include 4863 for 16 threads, 4889 for max threads, 4138 for 8 threads, 2732 for 4 threads, 1430 for 2 threads, and 726 for single-thread. Passmark results are 15992 for multithread, 2653 for single-thread, 50723 for integer math, 29947 for floating-point math, 231426 for data compression, and 13572 for data encryption.

In Fivem, the CPU's influence is most visible at lower resolutions where the GPU can push very high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 233 FPS; that number is close to the practical ceiling for this processor's single-thread throughput in a multiplayer environment with many entities. The 1080p Medium result of 205 FPS and High result of 164 FPS show that as GPU load increases, the CPU has more room, but the Low preset reveals the CPU's constraint. The 4600G's single-core score of 726 in 3DMark and 1919 in Cinebench R23 are modest by modern standards, yet they are sufficient to keep Fivem above 120 FPS at 1080p even on Medium.

At 2560x1440, the CPU becomes less of a factor. The 1440p Low result of 171 FPS is still high, but the gap to 1440p Medium (135 FPS) and High (108 FPS) is driven more by GPU load. At 4K, the CPU is nearly irrelevant: the 4K Low result of 95 FPS versus 4K Medium at 75 FPS and 4K High at 60 FPS shows the GPU is the primary limiter. The CPU's 12 threads help with background tasks and multiplayer server communication, but Fivem's core simulation often runs on fewer threads, making the 4600G's single-thread performance the deciding factor.

The nearest CPU rivals underscore the 4600G's position. It is 0.1 percent faster than the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, 0.6 percent slower than the Ryzen 3 8300GE, and 0.6 percent faster than the Core 7 150U. These differences are within noise, meaning the 4600G offers competitive compute for its age. The CPU's 71st percentile rank indicates it outperforms most installed processors, but it is not a high-end part. In Fivem, the practical takeaway is that the 4600G can feed the RTX 4070 up to roughly 230 FPS at 1080p, but beyond that, the CPU will cap performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with average FPS for all combinations and min/max values for Medium settings only.

At 3840x2160, the combo averages 95 FPS on Low, 75 FPS on Medium (min 64, max 86), 60 FPS on High, and 47 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 48 FPS, a 102 percent reduction. The Medium preset shows a 22 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, indicating some frame pacing variability at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 47 FPS is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, suggesting that Ultra is not viable at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 171 FPS on Low, 135 FPS on Medium (min 115, max 156), 108 FPS on High, and 84 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 1440p has a 41 FPS range, which is wider than at 4K, likely due to CPU involvement at higher frame rates. The 1440p Low result is 76 FPS higher than 4K Low, showing the resolution's impact on GPU load. The 1440p Ultra result of 84 FPS is playable for most users, but the gap to High (108 FPS) is 24 FPS, a 22 percent penalty for Ultra settings.

At 1920x1080, the averages are 233 FPS on Low, 205 FPS on Medium (min 175, max 236), 164 FPS on High, and 128 FPS on Ultra. The 1080p Medium preset shows a 61 FPS range between min and max, the largest spread in the dataset, which reflects the CPU's fluctuating load in multiplayer scenarios. The 1080p Low result of 233 FPS is the highest of any tested combination, and the 1080p Ultra result of 128 FPS is still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset is consistent: Low drops by 62 FPS (27 percent), Medium by 70 FPS (34 percent), High by 56 FPS (34 percent), and Ultra by 44 FPS (34 percent). From 1440p to 4K, the drops are larger: Low by 76 FPS (44 percent), Medium by 60 FPS (44 percent), High by 48 FPS (44 percent), and Ultra by 37 FPS (44 percent). This consistent 44 percent reduction from 1440p to 4K suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at those resolutions, while the 27-34 percent reduction from 1080p to 1440p indicates a more balanced load.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 on High provides 108 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. At 1920x1080, the combo exceeds 128 FPS even on Ultra, but the CPU becomes a factor at Low settings (233 FPS).

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648, which is 0.1 percent faster than the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628), 0.4 percent faster than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507), and 1.3 percent slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135). In Fivem, the 4070's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for all tested presets.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 4600G a bottleneck for the RTX 4070?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 233 FPS, which is near the CPU's practical limit; the 4600G's single-core 3DMark score is 726. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiter, so the CPU is only a bottleneck at very high frame rates. The 4600G's 6 cores and 12 threads handle Fivem's multiplayer load without issue.

Q: What settings provide the smoothest experience at 4K?

A: The 4K Medium preset averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K High preset averages 60 FPS exactly, while 4K Ultra averages 47 FPS, which is too low for smooth gameplay. For a consistent 60+ FPS, Medium is the highest viable preset at 4K.

Q: How does this combo rank overall in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1020 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 27.5 percent of all tested setups. The rank reflects the CPU's 71st percentile and GPU's 81st percentile, with the final position heavily influenced by resolution and preset choice.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 233 FPS while Ultra averages 128 FPS, a difference of 105 FPS (45 percent reduction). The Medium preset averages 205 FPS with a minimum of 175 FPS, and High averages 164 FPS. The scaling is not linear, with the largest relative drop between High and Ultra (36 FPS, 22 percent).

Settings Recommendations

For a 60 FPS target at 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest viable option, delivering 75 FPS average with a minimum of 64 FPS. The High preset at 4K averages exactly 60 FPS, which leaves no headroom for demanding scenes, while Ultra drops to 47 FPS and should be avoided. At 2560x1440, the High preset provides 108 FPS, which is smooth for most displays, and the Ultra preset at 84 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz monitors. The 1440p Medium preset at 135 FPS is ideal for 144 Hz panels, with a minimum of 115 FPS ensuring minimal dips.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 128 FPS is the best choice for high-refresh displays, as it stays above 120 FPS. The Medium preset at 205 FPS is overkill for most monitors but offers a 175 FPS minimum, which is still excellent. The Low preset at 233 FPS is only useful for competitive play with very high refresh rates, but it sacrifices visual fidelity for minimal gains. The data suggests the sweet spot for this combo is 2560x1440 on High, as it balances the GPU's capabilities with the CPU's limits, while 1080p Ultra offers the best visual experience without dropping below 120 FPS. For 4K users, Medium is the recommended preset, as it maintains a 64 FPS minimum and avoids the frame pacing issues seen at higher settings.