Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 148 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 59 | 73 | 97 | 121 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 136 | 172 | 206 |
| 1080p Full HD | 161 | 197 | 214 | 232 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: How does this CPU+GPU combo rank in Fivem among all tested combinations?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 243rd out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 13.5% of all configurations tested for this game.
Q: What is the best performance this combo achieves at 1080p?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 232.3 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Ultra settings, the combo still delivers a strong 160.6 FPS at the same resolution.
Q: How does performance scale from 1080p to 4K at High settings?
A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 197 at 1920x1080 to 136 at 2560x1440, then down to 72.5 at 3840x2160. This represents a 63.2% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Does the integrated graphics in the CPU affect this game's performance?
A: The Ryzen 5 4600G includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, but since the system uses the discrete RTX 4080 SUPER, the integrated GPU does not influence the measured FPS in this configuration.
Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13,593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, has a nearly identical average benchmark score with a 0% delta.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors in raw compute?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score of 53,610 puts it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and 2.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, ranking it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing, and the Fivem data reflects that clearly. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a multiplayer title that can be sensitive to texture streaming and draw distances. The GPU's base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2550 MHz, combined with 10,240 shading units, give it enormous raw throughput — 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.
What is striking about the measured FPS is how much headroom the GPU has at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 232.3 FPS, and even at 4K Low it maintains 121.1 FPS. This suggests the RTX 4080 SUPER is never the primary bottleneck in this game until you push to 4K Ultra, where it drops to 59.4 FPS. The GPU's 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are largely irrelevant for Fivem's rendering workload, but the sheer rasterization power of the Ada Lovelace architecture (5 nm process, 45,900 million transistors) carries the performance.
The GPU's memory configuration deserves attention. With 16 GB of VRAM, there is no indication from the FPS scaling that memory capacity becomes a limiting factor at any tested resolution or setting. The bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s is more than adequate for the game's demands, evidenced by the relatively smooth scaling from 1080p to 4K rather than a cliff-like drop that would indicate memory starvation.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals where the bottleneck shifts. At Low settings, performance goes from 232.3 FPS at 1080p to 206 at 1440p (an 11.3% drop) and then to 121.1 at 4K (a 41.2% drop from 1440p). This pattern shows that at 1080p and 1440p Low, the CPU is likely the limiting factor — the GPU has so much headroom that frame rates are constrained by the Ryzen 5 4600G's ability to feed the pipeline.
At Ultra settings, the scaling tells a different story. From 160.6 FPS at 1080p to 107.3 at 1440p (a 33.2% drop) and then to 59.4 at 4K (a 44.6% drop from 1440p), the GPU becomes increasingly the bottleneck as resolution rises. The 4K Ultra figure of 59.4 FPS is the only measured result below 60 FPS in the entire dataset, indicating that this setting pushes the RTX 4080 SUPER to its limits in Fivem.
The Medium settings curve sits between these extremes: 213.9 FPS at 1080p, 172.3 at 1440p, and 96.7 at 4K. The fact that 4K Medium still delivers nearly 100 FPS while 4K Ultra drops to 59.4 suggests that the Ultra preset includes some particularly expensive effects that disproportionately impact the higher resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 243 out of 1792 tested combinations in Fivem puts it in the top 13.5% of all configurations. This is an interesting result when you consider the components individually. The RTX 4080 SUPER sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 4600G manages only the 75th percentile of all CPUs. The combination ranks slightly below what the GPU alone would suggest, which points to the CPU holding back the system in Fivem.
Fivem is a multiplayer modification framework for a game originally released in 2017, and its performance characteristics are known to be CPU-sensitive in many scenarios. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 232.3 FPS, but the RTX 4080 SUPER is capable of far more in less CPU-bound titles. The gap between the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the combo's 13.5% position (roughly 86.5th percentile) reflects this CPU limitation.
Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing sits in a solid mid-to-high tier. The 243rd rank out of 1792 means there are 242 configurations that perform better in Fivem, but it also means this combo outperforms over 1,500 other pairings. For a CPU with a 65 W TDP paired with a 320 W GPU, the balance is heavily skewed toward the graphics card.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance for the best experience across resolutions. At 1920x1080, every preset delivers playable frame rates, with Ultra at 160.6 FPS being the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The jump from High (197 FPS) to Ultra (160.6 FPS) costs 18.5% performance but likely brings meaningful visual improvements.
At 2560x1440, Ultra still maintains 107.3 FPS, which is above the 100 FPS threshold that many players consider ideal for a multiplayer game. High at 136 FPS offers a comfortable margin, but Ultra remains the best balance of fidelity and performance at this resolution.
The 3840x2160 resolution is where compromises become necessary. Ultra drops to 59.4 FPS, which is borderline for competitive multiplayer. High at 72.5 FPS is playable, but Medium at 96.7 FPS provides a much smoother experience while still maintaining good visual quality. For 4K gaming, Medium is the recommended preset, as it delivers nearly 100 FPS and avoids the steep performance penalty of Ultra settings.
Across all resolutions, Low settings are unnecessary for this GPU — even at 4K, Low produces 121.1 FPS, indicating that players can comfortably use Medium or High without worrying about frame rate drops.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low averages 232.3 FPS, Medium 213.9 FPS, High 197 FPS, and Ultra 160.6 FPS. The performance gap between Low and Ultra is 71.7 FPS, or 30.9% of the Low figure. This indicates that even the heaviest preset at 1080p leaves substantial headroom.
At 2560x1440, the results are 206 FPS on Low, 172.3 FPS on Medium, 136 FPS on High, and 107.3 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 11.3% at Low to 33.2% at Ultra, showing that higher settings amplify the resolution penalty.
At 3840x2160, the figures are 121.1 FPS on Low, 96.7 FPS on Medium, 72.5 FPS on High, and 59.4 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more severe, with reductions of 41.2% at Low and 44.6% at Ultra. The 4K Ultra result of 59.4 FPS is the only sub-60 FPS measurement in the entire dataset, underscoring the demanding nature of that configuration.
The pattern across all resolutions shows diminishing returns from lower settings as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 71.7 FPS; at 1440p, it is 98.7 FPS; at 4K, it is 61.7 FPS. This non-linear behavior suggests that at 1440p, the CPU is particularly effective at keeping frame rates high even at Low settings, while at 4K, the GPU workload dominates regardless of quality preset.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture (Renoir codename) built on TSMC's 7 nm process. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz, combined with 8 MB of shared L3 cache, provide adequate compute for Fivem, but the data reveals that this CPU is the limiting factor in this pairing at lower resolutions.
The CPU's benchmark results paint a picture of a mid-range processor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,593 and single-core score of 1,919 place it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, matches its average score almost exactly (0% delta), while the Intel Core i3-13100F trails by 1%. This positioning suggests the 4600G is competitive with modern budget and mid-range parts.
In Fivem specifically, the CPU's influence is most visible at 1080p Low, where the combo achieves 232.3 FPS. The RTX 4080 SUPER is theoretically capable of much higher frame rates in this scenario, but the Ryzen 5 4600G's single-thread performance — a PassMark single-thread score of 2,653 — sets the ceiling. The 12 threads help maintain consistent frame pacing in multiplayer scenarios, but the game's primary rendering thread appears to be the constraint.
The 65 W TDP of the CPU, paired with the 320 W TDP of the GPU, creates an interesting power dynamic. The system's total power draw is dominated by the graphics card, and the CPU's modest 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth (dual-channel DDR4) is sufficient for Fivem's needs. The CPU's PCIe Gen 3 interface with 20 lanes does not bottleneck the GPU, as evidenced by the strong performance at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.
The data implies that in Fivem, this CPU is the bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p Low settings, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at 4K and at higher quality presets. Players seeking higher frame rates at 1080p would benefit more from a stronger CPU, while those targeting 4K Ultra would see improvements from a more powerful GPU. This pairing is best suited for 1440p gaming, where the balance between CPU and GPU utilization appears most even.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 121.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 72.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 59.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 206.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 172.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 232.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 213.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 197.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 160.6 |
Fivem with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 4080 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + RTX 4080 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.