Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 118 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 68 | 82 | 101 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 108 | 132 | 162 |
| 1080p Full HD | 95 | 152 | 185 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a surprisingly robust experience in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. The data shows a combination that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck only at the highest settings. At 1080p and 1440p, this combo provides high refresh rate capability, while 4K demands careful settings management to maintain playable frame rates. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to determine the optimal configuration for this specific hardware pairing.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent scaling pattern as resolution increases, indicating a shift in system bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 226 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 162 FPS, a 28% reduction, and further to 101 FPS at 4K Low, a 55% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline at lower settings strongly suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly, but the processor cannot feed it data fast enough to maintain the highest possible frame rates.
The scaling behavior changes dramatically when we examine higher graphical presets. At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 185 FPS at 1080p to 132 FPS at 1440p (a 29% reduction) and then to 82 FPS at 4K (a 56% reduction from 1080p). This pattern is nearly identical to the Low setting scaling, suggesting the GPU is still not fully saturated at these resolutions. The trend continues with High settings: 152 FPS at 1080p, 108 FPS at 1440p (a 29% drop), and 68 FPS at 4K (a 55% drop from 1080p).
The most telling data point is at Ultra settings, where the scaling becomes more severe. The combo drops from 95 FPS at 1080p to 68 FPS at 1440p (a 28% reduction) and then to 42 FPS at 4K (a 56% reduction from 1080p). However, the absolute frame rates are much lower across the board, indicating that the Ultra preset places a significant load on the GPU. The fact that the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K remains consistent around 55-56% across all settings suggests a balanced system, but the low absolute numbers at 4K Ultra point to the GPU being the primary constraint in that specific configuration.
The data indicates that this pairing is well-suited for 1440p gaming, as the performance gap between 1080p and 1440p is relatively small in percentage terms (around 28-29%), but the visual fidelity gain is substantial. At 4K, the performance penalty becomes more pronounced, and users will need to rely on lower settings to achieve smooth gameplay. The 42 FPS average at 4K Ultra is below the threshold for a consistently smooth experience, while the 68 FPS at 4K High is more acceptable.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 serves as the primary rendering engine in this configuration, and its characteristics directly influence the measured results. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for Downfall at all tested resolutions and settings, as there is no data indicating memory capacity or bandwidth limitations. The 8 GB capacity is adequate for the game's textures and geometry, even at 4K, based on the playable frame rates achieved.
The GPU's clock speeds are notable, with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. This boost clock is aggressively high, and it helps the GPU maintain performance when rendering demanding scenes. The RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process, which contributes to its efficiency. The GPU's TDP is rated at 115 W, and it has a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s, which are the raw throughput figures that determine how quickly it can process the visual data for Downfall.
The GPU's direct benchmarks place it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (with a deltaPct of -0.2%), the AMD Radeon 780M (with a deltaPct of 0.3%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (with a deltaPct of 0.5%). This indicates that the RTX 4060 sits in a specific performance tier, and its measured FPS in Downfall reflects this positioning. The GPU's DirectX 12 benchmark score of 76 and its Passmark G3D score of 19545 provide further context for its raw compute capabilities, but the in-game FPS data is the most relevant metric for this analysis.
The GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the RTX 4060 is clearly the bottleneck, as the 42 FPS average is a direct result of the GPU's rendering limits. The GPU is also the limiting factor at 4K High, where 68 FPS is achieved. In contrast, at 1080p Low, the GPU is underutilized, as the 226 FPS average far exceeds what the CPU can consistently feed it. The data suggests that the RTX 4060 is a capable GPU for this title, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus mean it is not designed for maximum settings at 4K, which is reflected in the measured performance.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Downfall?*
A: The data indicates that 1440p provides the best balance of performance and visual quality. At High settings, the combo achieves 108 FPS at 1440p, which is a 29% reduction from the 152 FPS at 1080p but offers significantly higher resolution. At 4K High, the frame rate drops to 68 FPS, which is still playable but less smooth.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: Yes, but with limitations. The combo achieves 68 FPS at 4K High and 82 FPS at 4K Medium, which are acceptable for most players. However, at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 42, which may be too low for some users seeking a consistent 60 FPS experience.
Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival GPUs?
A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a score of 17666, which is a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4060 is slightly slower. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% slower.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1080p with lower settings, the CPU is the primary bottleneck. The data shows a 226 FPS average at Low settings and 185 FPS at Medium, which are very high frame rates. The GPU is not fully utilized at these settings, and the Ryzen 5 5600F becomes the limiting factor in feeding the GPU with data.
Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings?
A: The difference is significant across all resolutions. At 1080p, the drop from High (152 FPS) to Ultra (95 FPS) is a 37.5% reduction. At 1440p, the drop is from 108 FPS to 68 FPS, a 37% reduction. At 4K, the drop is from 68 FPS to 42 FPS, a 38% reduction. The Ultra preset imposes a consistent performance penalty of roughly 37-38% compared to High.
Q: Does the combo rank high among all tested combinations for this game?
A: The combo ranks 1531 out of 2928 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, indicating that while it is not a top-tier system, it performs respectably for the hardware involved.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1531 out of 2928 tested combos for Downfall. This ranking places the system in the 52nd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it performs better than just over half of the systems in the database. This is a solid result for a mid-range pairing, indicating that the hardware is well-balanced for this particular game, which was released in 2016 and does not have extremely demanding requirements by modern standards.
The ranking is influenced by both the CPU and GPU's individual performance tiers. The Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which has a nearly identical score of 36938 (a deltaPct of 0%), suggesting these processors are equivalent in raw compute. The GPU, on the other hand, sits at the 61st percentile, indicating that the graphics card is the weaker component in this pairing. The GPU's average score of 17639 is closely matched by the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which is a significantly older product.
The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile (85th) and the GPU's lower percentile (61st) explains the combo's overall ranking. The system is not held back by the processor, which is more than capable of driving the RTX 4060. Instead, the GPU's performance ceiling determines the system's overall ranking. This is reflected in the measured FPS data, where the system can achieve very high frame rates at lower settings but struggles at 4K Ultra. The ranking of 1531 out of 2928 suggests that the combo is competitive with other mid-range systems, but it does not have the raw GPU power to break into the top tier of configurations.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 152 FPS while providing a significant visual upgrade over Medium (185 FPS) and Low (226 FPS). The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 95 FPS, which is still playable but does not offer enough visual improvement to justify the 37.5% performance penalty compared to High. For users with high refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset at 185 FPS is also a strong option, but High offers better image quality with only a 17.8% reduction in frame rate.
At 1440p, the High preset is again the balanced recommendation, achieving an average of 108 FPS. This is a smooth experience for most monitors, and the visual quality is substantially better than at 1080p. The Medium preset at 132 FPS is an alternative for those who prefer even higher frame rates, while the Ultra preset at 68 FPS is the minimum for a playable experience but is not recommended due to the significant drop from High. The Low preset at 162 FPS is not recommended, as the visual degradation is too severe for the marginal performance gain.
For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, providing an average of 82 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. The High preset at 68 FPS is also viable for players who prioritize image quality, but the Medium preset provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 42 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the playable threshold for most users. The Low preset at 101 FPS is technically an option, but the visual quality at 4K Low is likely to be poor, negating the benefits of the high resolution. The data clearly shows that the Medium preset at 4K is the most sensible configuration for this hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across all tested configurations. At 3840x2160 (4K), the system achieves an average of 101 FPS at Low settings, 82 FPS at Medium (with a minimum of 70 FPS and maximum of 95 FPS), 68 FPS at High, and 42 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset is the only one at 4K with recorded minimum and maximum frame times, indicating a range of 70 to 95 FPS. This variance suggests that the game's scene complexity has a noticeable impact on performance at this resolution.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates are significantly higher. The Low preset delivers 162 FPS, Medium delivers 132 FPS (with a range of 112 to 152 FPS), High delivers 108 FPS, and Ultra delivers 68 FPS. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent, with a 58% reduction in frame rate from the lowest to highest settings. The Medium preset's frame time range of 112 to 152 FPS indicates a stable experience, as the variance is less than 40 FPS.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo shows its maximum potential. The Low preset achieves 226 FPS, Medium achieves 185 FPS (with a range of 157 to 213 FPS), High achieves 152 FPS, and Ultra achieves 95 FPS. The Ultra preset's 95 FPS average is the lowest at this resolution, but it still provides a smooth experience. The Medium preset has the widest recorded frame time range of 157 to 213 FPS, which is a 56 FPS spread, indicating that the game can be demanding on the CPU at this resolution. The data overall shows a predictable and consistent performance profile, with frame rates scaling smoothly with both resolution and settings.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F plays a crucial role in this system's performance, particularly at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is not the primary bottleneck. The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. These specifications are more than adequate for Downfall, which is a 2016 title that does not require a high core count or extreme clock speeds.
The CPU's benchmark scores confirm its strong performance. It has a Passmark single-thread score of 2872 and a multi-thread score of 19236. The single-thread performance is particularly important for gaming, as most games, including Downfall, rely heavily on a few cores. The CPU's percentile ranking of 85th among all CPUs indicates it is in the top 15% of processors, and its average benchmark score of 36945 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which scores 36938. This suggests the Ryzen 5 5600F is a highly capable processor for gaming workloads.
In the measured FPS data, the CPU's influence is most apparent at 1080p with Low settings, where the system achieves 226 FPS. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU can process game logic and issue draw calls quickly enough to keep up with the GPU's output. However, the CPU can become a limiting factor at 1080p with lower settings, as the GPU is not fully saturated and the processor must work harder to maintain high frame rates. The data does not show any signs of CPU bottlenecking at 1440p or 4K, as the GPU becomes the limiting component at those resolutions. The Ryzen 5 5600F's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its high boost clock, provide a solid foundation for this gaming system, ensuring that the RTX 4060 can perform to its full potential in most scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 101.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 162.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 132.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 68.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 226.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 185.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 95.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.