Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 56 | 68 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 89 | 109 | 133 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 125 | 153 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
# Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT produces a fascinating split personality in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. The data reveals a combo that handles 1080p and 1440p with authority but begins to show strain at 4K, particularly under the Ultra preset. This pairing ranks 2169 out of 2928 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the field. The measured frames per second tell a story of a GPU that remains the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the six-core CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 187 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 133 FPS, a reduction of 54 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 83 FPS. This progression reveals that even at the least demanding preset, resolution scaling exacts a significant toll—the jump from 1080p to 4K at Low settings represents a 104 FPS loss, or roughly a 56% reduction in frame rate.
The Medium preset tells a similar story with a slightly different slope. At 1080p Medium, the average is 153 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 109 FPS, and at 4K Medium, the average settles at 68 FPS. The delta between 1080p and 1440p Medium is 44 FPS, while the delta between 1440p and 4K Medium is 41 FPS. This near-linear scaling suggests the rendering pipeline is handling the increased pixel count predictably, with no sudden bottlenecks emerging until the Ultra preset is applied.
Ultra settings dramatically alter the scaling curve. At 1080p Ultra, the combo produces 78 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, that drops to 56 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average collapses to 35 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 1440p Ultra is 22 FPS, but the gap between 1440p and 4K Ultra is also 21 FPS. However, the absolute numbers at 4K Ultra are low enough to suggest the GPU is running out of headroom entirely. The 35 FPS average at 4K Ultra is barely playable for a horror title where smooth motion matters for atmosphere.
The scaling pattern indicates that the limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames fast enough to reach 187 FPS at Low, but the GPU becomes the ceiling as settings increase. At 4K, the GPU is unquestionably the bottleneck across all presets, with the 56 FPS at High and 35 FPS at Ultra showing that pixel throughput is the primary constraint. The data implies that this combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming in Downfall, with 4K reserved for Low or Medium settings if playable frame rates are the goal.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 2169 out of 2928 tested combinations in Downfall, which places it in the 74th percentile of all combos tested—meaning roughly 74% of tested pairings perform better. This ranking sits notably lower than what the raw FPS numbers might suggest, because many higher-ranked combos likely feature more recent GPUs or CPUs that handle the game's demands with greater ease.
Contextualizing this rank against the individual components provides insight. The Ryzen 5 5600F holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs in general benchmark data, while the RX 5700 XT sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The combo's in-game rank of 2169 out of 2928 is thus dragged down by the GPU's lower relative standing. The CPU is clearly the stronger component in this pairing, but the game's frame rates at higher resolutions are governed by the GPU.
The nearest rivals in general CPU benchmarks show how close the Ryzen 5 5600F sits to its competition. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938, essentially identical to the Ryzen's 36,945 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018, a 0.2% advantage. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093, 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112, 0.5% ahead. These tiny deltas suggest the 5600F is well-matched against its peers, yet the combo's overall rank in Downfall is constrained by the GPU's 59th percentile standing.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a similarly tight cluster. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16,351, a 0.1% gap from the RX 5700 XT's 16,361 average. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408, 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16,415, also 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, 0.9% ahead. These margins are negligible in general benchmarks, but in Downfall's measured data, the RX 5700 XT's performance at 4K Ultra (35 FPS) versus 1080p Low (187 FPS) shows the GPU's architectural limits under heavy load.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture with the Navi 10 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It packs 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU's base clock runs at 1605 MHz, with a game clock of 1755 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in Downfall at 4K. The game's horror environments often feature dense textures and atmospheric effects that consume memory. At 4K Ultra, the combo averages only 35 FPS, which suggests the GPU is not only compute-bound but potentially memory-constrained. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K data shows the GPU struggling to maintain fluid frame delivery.
The pixel rate of 121.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 304.8 GTexel/s provide theoretical throughput that the measured FPS data confirms. At 1080p Low, the GPU achieves 187 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 35 FPS—a 152 FPS difference. This five-fold reduction in frame rate across a four-fold increase in pixel count (1920x1080 has approximately 2.07 million pixels, while 3840x2160 has roughly 8.29 million) indicates the GPU is scaling close to the expected rate, with no unexpected inefficiencies.
The GPU's FP32 performance of 9.754 TFLOPS places it as a mid-range card from 2019, and the measured results in Downfall align with that positioning. The passmark G3D score of 16,277 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,134 provide additional context. The GPU's percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs means it outperforms a majority of cards, but the measured FPS at 4K Ultra suggests that modern horror titles with heavy effects can push it to its limits.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which preset delivers the best experience. At 1080p, all four presets produce playable frame rates: Low averages 187 FPS, Medium averages 153 FPS, High averages 125 FPS, and Ultra averages 78 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p still maintains a smooth 78 FPS, making it the recommended choice for players with 1080p displays who want maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. Low averages 133 FPS, Medium averages 109 FPS, and High averages 89 FPS, all of which remain comfortably playable. Ultra at 1440p drops to 56 FPS, which is borderline for a horror game where sudden movements and quick camera pans benefit from higher frame rates. For 1440p, High settings at 89 FPS offer the best balance between visual quality and performance, though Medium at 109 FPS provides a safety margin for scenes with heavy particle effects.
At 4K, the options narrow considerably. Low averages 83 FPS, which is playable but visually sparse. Medium averages 68 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS and maximum of 78 FPS, providing a more immersive experience while staying above the 60 FPS threshold on average. High drops to 56 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS, which is likely too choppy for a horror game that relies on tension and atmosphere. For 4K, Medium settings at 68 FPS are the recommended choice, offering the best measured balance of visual fidelity and fluidity.
The data shows that the Medium preset provides the most consistent frame delivery across all resolutions. The measured minimum and maximum values for Medium settings—58 to 78 FPS at 4K, 93 to 126 FPS at 1440p, and 130 to 176 FPS at 1080p—indicate stable frame pacing without severe dips. This consistency makes Medium the safest choice for players who prioritize smoothness over maximum visual detail.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. Low settings average 187 FPS, the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium settings average 153 FPS with a range of 130 to 176 FPS. High settings average 125 FPS, and Ultra settings average 78 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 109 FPS, showing that settings have a substantial impact even at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the averages shift downward noticeably. Low settings produce 133 FPS, Medium produces 109 FPS with a range of 93 to 126 FPS, High produces 89 FPS, and Ultra produces 56 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at each settings tier is consistent: Low loses 54 FPS, Medium loses 44 FPS, High loses 36 FPS, and Ultra loses 22 FPS. The diminishing absolute losses at higher settings suggest that the GPU's shading units become the limiting factor rather than memory bandwidth.
At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens considerably. Low settings average 83 FPS, Medium averages 68 FPS with a range of 58 to 78 FPS, High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 35 FPS is the lowest measured value in the entire dataset, and it highlights the GPU's inability to handle maximum settings at this resolution. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K is 83, 68, 56, and 35 FPS—a steep decline that accelerates at the highest preset.
The Medium preset's measured minimum and maximum values provide insight into frame consistency. At 1080p, the range is 130 to 176 FPS, a 46 FPS spread. At 1440p, the range is 93 to 126 FPS, a 33 FPS spread. At 4K, the range is 58 to 78 FPS, a 20 FPS spread. The narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes more consistently saturated, reducing the variance in frame delivery.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It runs on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 512 KB per-core L2 cache provide ample capacity for game data.
In Downfall, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but at 1080p Low, the CPU's capabilities become evident. The 187 FPS average at 1080p Low suggests the 5600F can feed frames quickly enough to keep the GPU busy. The PassMark single-thread score of 2,872 and multithread score of 19,236 indicate strong single-core performance, which is critical for game logic and draw call processing.
The CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its strength, but the combo's 2169th rank in Downfall out of 2928 combos shows that the pairing as a whole is held back by the GPU. The nearest rivals' benchmark scores—all within 0.5% of the 5600F's 36,945 average—demonstrate that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this configuration. At 4K Ultra, the GPU's 35 FPS average is clearly the bottleneck, as the CPU has ample headroom to process the game's logic at far higher frame rates.
The 7 nm process node and 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die size give the 5600F excellent efficiency characteristics. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the RX 5700 XT's PCIe 4.0 x16 connection. The measured FPS data at 1080p Low—187 FPS—is close to what the GPU can theoretically output, suggesting the CPU is not introducing any meaningful frame pacing issues. The CPU's 12 threads handle Downfall's horror-game workloads comfortably, with no evidence of thread saturation in the measured results.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Downfall with this combo?
A: The data shows 1080p delivers the highest frame rates across all settings, with Ultra averaging 78 FPS. At 1440p, High settings provide 89 FPS, and at 4K, Medium settings yield 68 FPS. For the best balance of visual quality and smoothness, 1440p High at 89 FPS is the strongest measured option.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Downfall?
A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 4K Low, the average is 83 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it is 68 FPS. High drops to 56 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS, which is likely too choppy for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the RX 5700 XT's 8 GB VRAM affect performance?
A: The measured data shows significant frame rate drops at 4K Ultra (35 FPS) compared to 1080p Ultra (78 FPS). The 8 GB capacity, combined with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, appears sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K with high-detail textures.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600F a bottleneck for the RX 5700 XT in this game?
A: No. The CPU's 85th percentile rank and the high frame rates at 1080p Low (187 FPS) indicate it can feed the GPU effectively. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at higher resolutions, particularly at 4K Ultra where the GPU averages only 35 FPS.
Q: What is the combo's rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: This combo ranks 2169 out of 2928 tested combinations in Downfall. This places it in the lower-middle portion of all tested combos, influenced primarily by the GPU's 59th percentile standing rather than the CPU's 85th percentile rank.
Q: Which settings preset provides the most consistent frame delivery?
A: The Medium preset shows the most stable measured ranges across all resolutions: 130 to 176 FPS at 1080p, 93 to 126 FPS at 1440p, and 58 to 78 FPS at 4K. This consistency makes Medium the safest choice for avoiding frame dips.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 133.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 187.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 153.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 125.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 78.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RX 5700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.