Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Evolve, but the data shows a sharp performance cliff at 4K Ultra. The measured FPS across resolutions reveals a system that is clearly GPU-limited at higher settings, while the CPU provides ample headroom to push high frame rates at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against the component specifications, and provides clear guidance on how to optimize the experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a predictable and steep decline as resolution increases, but the rate of decline varies significantly based on the selected graphics preset. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 190 FPS at 1920x1080 to 127 FPS at 2560x1440, a 33% reduction, and then to 72 FPS at 3840x2160, a further 43% reduction. This substantial drop at 4K Low indicates that even at the lowest graphical load, the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck, though the CPU is still able to feed it enough data to maintain a playable frame rate.

The scaling behavior changes dramatically at High settings. Average FPS falls from 115 at 1080p to 77 at 1440p (a 33% drop) and then to 44 at 4K (a 43% drop from 1440p). This pattern suggests that as the resolution increases, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth of the RTX 4060 become the limiting factors. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, appears to be a constraint at 4K, as the data shows a consistent inability to maintain high frame rates at that resolution regardless of the preset.

The most telling data point is at Ultra settings. The frame rate drops from 80 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to a mere 31 FPS at 4K (a 43% reduction from 1440p). This is a clear indication that the RTX 4060 is overwhelmed by the combined demands of 4K resolution and Ultra settings. The performance curve is not linear; it is a series of steep drops that point to the GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity and its 128-bit memory interface as the primary architectural limits for this title at high resolutions.

The data indicates that the limiting component shifts from the CPU at 1080p Low to the GPU at 1440p and 4K. At 1080p Low, the 190 FPS average is close to what the CPU can deliver, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering capabilities are the sole constraint. The 31 FPS result at 4K Ultra is a stark illustration of this, showing that the combination is not suited for 4K gaming with maximum settings in Evolve.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate for this combo at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS, indicating a very smooth experience with no significant frame time spikes.

Q: How does the combo perform at 2560x1440 with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 77. This is a significant drop from the 115 FPS seen at 1080p, highlighting the GPU's workload increase at a higher resolution.

*Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming in Evolve?*

A: The data shows it is only playable at 4K Low settings, where it averages 72 FPS. At 4K Medium, it drops to 56 FPS, and at 4K High, it falls to 44 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average is just 31 FPS, which is often considered too low for a smooth experience.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The measured difference is substantial. The average FPS at Low is 190, while at Ultra it drops to 80. This represents a 58% decrease in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: Based on the data, what is the best resolution for a high-refresh-rate monitor?

A: For a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, 1080p is the clear choice. The data shows that High settings (115 FPS) and Medium settings (147 FPS) can both take advantage of such a display, while even Ultra settings (80 FPS) provide a playable experience.

Q: What is the GPU's Passmark G3D score, and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4060 has a Passmark G3D score of 19545. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, has an average score of 17666, which is a 0.2% difference, indicating they are statistically equivalent in that specific benchmark.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the central component in this analysis, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS patterns. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a likely contributor to the significant performance drop at 4K, as the game's assets may exceed the available VRAM, forcing the system to rely on slower system memory. The data shows that at 4K, even with Low settings, the average FPS is 72, which is a 62% reduction from the 190 FPS seen at 1080p Low, suggesting a severe bandwidth limitation.

The GPU's clock speeds are a key factor in its performance. It has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. These relatively high clocks help the 3072 shading units deliver strong performance at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the 190 FPS at 1080p Low. However, the boost clock cannot compensate for the memory bandwidth limitations at higher resolutions. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is substantial, but it is underutilized at 4K due to the memory bottleneck.

The RTX 4060's performance data shows a clear trend of being a 1080p-centric card. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 780M, has a score of 17588, a 0.3% difference, which shows they perform similarly in synthetic benchmarks. However, in Evolve, the measured FPS data indicates that the card is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates, but it struggles to maintain playable performance at 4K with high or ultra presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates excellent performance. The average FPS ranges from 80 on Ultra to 190 on Low. The Medium preset delivers an average of 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 and a maximum of 169 FPS, showing a stable frame time. The High preset averages 115 FPS. These results indicate that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, with even the most demanding preset (Ultra) staying above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are significant. The Low preset averages 127 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Medium preset averages 99 FPS, with a minimum of 84 FPS. The High preset averages 77 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. However, the Ultra preset averages only 54 FPS, dipping below the 60 FPS target for a smooth experience. This data shows that 1440p is viable for all settings except Ultra, where compromises may be necessary.

At 3840x2160, the combo is clearly out of its comfort zone. The Low preset averages 72 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS, indicating some stutter. The High preset averages 44 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages just 31 FPS. These results show that 4K gaming is only feasible with the Low preset, and even then, the experience is not as fluid as at lower resolutions. The data suggests that this resolution is best avoided for a consistent, high-quality experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2003 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the 54th percentile, meaning it performs better than a slight majority of all tested systems. This is a moderate ranking, reflecting the fact that while the combo is capable, it is not a top-tier performer, especially at higher resolutions.

This ranking is consistent with the component specifications. The CPU has an 85th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, showing it is a strong processor. The GPU has a 61st percentile ranking versus all GPUs, showing it is an average-to-good graphics card. The combo's overall rank of 2003 is a blend of these two, but the game's performance is heavily weighted by the GPU. The data shows that the combo is better than 1700 other tested combos, but worse than 1697, indicating a very middle-of-the-pack result.

The ranking suggests that while this setup is a competent 1080p machine, it is not competitive with high-end systems that feature more powerful GPUs. The low rank is primarily due to the GPU's limitations at 4K, as the CPU is more than capable of supporting higher frame rates. This is a classic example of a balanced mid-range system that excels at its intended resolution but falls behind when pushed to extreme settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The CPU's performance is strong, as indicated by its Passmark multithread score of 19236 and single-thread score of 2872. This places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, has an average score of 36938, which is a 0% difference from the 5600F's average benchmark score of 36945.

In Evolve, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (190 FPS) shows that the CPU is capable of delivering very high frame rates, but it is not the limiting factor. The data shows that at 1080p, the frame rate is more heavily influenced by the GPU's settings, as changing from Low to Ultra drops the FPS from 190 to 80. This demonstrates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

However, the CPU's capabilities are still important. The 12 threads and 32 MB of shared L3 cache help ensure consistent frame pacing, as seen in the Medium preset's minimum FPS of 125 at 1080p. The CPU's high single-thread performance is also beneficial for a game like Evolve, which is an FPS title that often relies on a single primary thread for game logic. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 5600F is more than sufficient for this game, and it does not present a bottleneck until the GPU is pushed to its absolute limits.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate.

For 1920x1080 with a 144Hz or higher monitor, the Medium preset is the best choice. It delivers an average of 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience without the graphical quality loss of the Low preset. The High preset is also viable, averaging 115 FPS, but the Medium preset offers a better balance of performance and visual fidelity, as the 147 FPS average is closer to the refresh rate ceiling of most high-end monitors.

For 1920x1080 with a standard 60Hz monitor, the Ultra preset is recommended. The average of 80 FPS is well above the 60 FPS target, allowing for maximum visual quality without sacrificing playability. The data shows that the combo has enough headroom to handle the most demanding settings at this resolution.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the best option. It averages 77 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for a smooth experience. The Medium preset also works (99 FPS), but High offers a better visual experience. The Ultra preset should be avoided, as the 54 FPS average will result in noticeable stuttering and a less fluid experience. For 4K, only the Low preset is recommended, as it is the only one that maintains an average FPS above 60 (72 FPS). All other presets at this resolution fall below the playable threshold, with the Ultra preset being particularly poor at 31 FPS.