Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT combination delivers a mid-range experience in Control, ranking 2141 out of 2888 tested combos. This places the pairing in the 26th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating that while it handles the game, a substantial portion of the tested hardware pool outperforms it. The data positions this combo as a solid 1080p performer, with capabilities extending into 1440p at reduced settings, but it struggles to maintain playable framerates at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2141 out of 2888 tested combinations places it firmly in the lower-middle tier of the benchmark database. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is outclassed by roughly 74% of all tested combos in Control specifically. The rank reflects a system that can play the game comfortably at standard high-refresh 1080p monitors, but it is not positioned for high-end 4K experiences or maxed-out settings at higher resolutions.

The ranking is a direct consequence of the two components’ relative standing in their respective categories. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all tested processors, which is a strong showing for the Ryzen 5 5600F. The GPU, however, is at the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, which drags the overall combo ranking down. This discrepancy is the defining characteristic of this pairing: a capable processor that is held back by a mid-tier graphics solution in a graphically demanding title like Control.

In practical terms, the rank means that users with this combo should expect performance typical of a 1080p-oriented system. The combination is not competitive with high-end builds, but it is far from the bottom of the pile. For the specific workload of Control, the data shows that the GPU is the primary constraint, and any attempt to push beyond 1080p will yield diminishing returns.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the dominant factor in determining this combo’s performance in Control. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data shows it becomes a limiting factor at 4K where the average frame rates drop below the playable threshold.

Clock speeds for the RX 5700 XT are listed with a base clock of 1605 MHz, a game clock of 1755 MHz, and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. The gap between the base and boost clocks indicates the card’s ability to scale under load, but the benchmark results show that this scaling is not enough to overcome the demands of Control at higher resolutions. The GPU’s raw compute capability is rated at 9.754 TFLOPS FP32, which is modest by modern standards and is reflected in the measured frame rates.

The GPU’s performance in Control follows a clear pattern: it scales well from Low to Medium settings, but the jump to High and Ultra settings exacts a heavy toll. At 1080p, the card moves from 115 FPS on Low to 63 FPS on Ultra, a drop of 45%. At 1440p, the range is 87 FPS on Low down to 48 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results are the most telling, with the card only managing 59 FPS on Low and falling to 32 FPS on Ultra. This indicates that the GPU’s 8 GB frame buffer and compute resources are simply overwhelmed at 4K.

The GPU’s percentile rank of 59 among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16361, places it in the mid-range category. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, show a delta of less than 1% in average score, suggesting that the RX 5700 XT is at a performance plateau where small architectural differences do not yield meaningful FPS gains in this game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F serves as the supporting component in this pairing, and its role is largely to ensure the GPU is not starved of data. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, the CPU provides a solid foundation for gaming. The base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.00 GHz are adequate for the single-threaded workloads that Control primarily relies on.

The CPU’s performance metrics are strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236. The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that the Ryzen 5 5600F is a high-performing processor that should not bottleneck the RX 5700 XT in most scenarios. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache is particularly beneficial for gaming, as it reduces memory latency and improves frame pacing.

However, the benchmark data for Control suggests that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in this combo. The frame rates are primarily dictated by the GPU’s capabilities, especially at higher resolutions where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become critical. At 1080p with Low settings, the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to push the GPU to its maximum output of 115 FPS, but the GPU’s ceiling is reached well before the CPU’s capacity is exhausted.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, show a delta of 0% or less in average benchmark score, indicating that the 5600F is competitively positioned. In the context of Control, the CPU is a non-issue; the data shows that upgrading the GPU would yield far greater FPS gains than upgrading the CPU, as the combo’s rank is dragged down by the graphics card’s 59th percentile standing.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this combo?*

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, with average FPS ranging from 63 on Ultra to 115 on Low. At 2560x1440, performance drops to a range of 48 to 87 FPS, while 3840x2160 is only playable on Low with 59 FPS.

Q: Can this combo handle Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, but just barely. The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold often considered smooth. For a more consistent experience, High settings at 1440p yield 55 FPS, while Medium provides a more comfortable 62 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945, which is within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093). This indicates near-identical synthetic performance among these processors.

Q: Is the GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: Yes, the data strongly suggests this. The GPU ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile. The measured FPS drops are consistent with GPU limitation, especially at 4K where the card cannot maintain playable frame rates even on Medium settings.

Q: What is the expected FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 82 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 94 FPS. This is the most balanced setting for maintaining high frame rates without sacrificing too much visual quality.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 2141 out of 2888 tested combos in Control. This places it in the lower-middle tier, meaning that while it can play the game, a majority of tested systems deliver higher frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 73 to 55, a reduction of 24.7%. Scaling from 1440p to 4K at the same settings yields a more severe drop, from 55 FPS to 37 FPS, a 32.7% reduction.

This scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component. The CPU’s performance is largely resolution-independent, so the FPS drop is directly attributable to the RX 5700 XT’s inability to maintain fill rate and memory bandwidth at higher pixel counts. The 8 GB frame buffer is also a factor, as higher resolutions require more memory for textures and buffers, which can lead to performance cliffs.

The data shows that the scaling is not linear. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 115 FPS to 59 FPS, a 48.7% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 63 FPS to 32 FPS, a 49.2% reduction. This consistent percentage drop across settings suggests that the GPU is operating at its absolute limit at 4K, regardless of the graphical workload.

The resolution scaling analysis points to a system that is well-suited for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p, but 4K is not a viable option for smooth gameplay. If the user wishes to play at 4K, the data suggests that only Low settings are playable, and even then, the frame rate hovers near the 60 FPS mark. The limiting component is unambiguously the GPU, as the CPU’s strong single-thread performance is not the bottleneck at any resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s resolution and frame rate preferences. For a 1080p display, the data shows that High settings provide an average of 73 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. Medium settings increase the average to 82 FPS, which is preferable for competitive play or high-refresh monitors, but the visual difference between Medium and High is noticeable in a game like Control with its detailed environments.

For 1440p, the data recommends Medium settings as the best compromise. The average FPS at 1440p Medium is 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. High settings at 1440p yield only 55 FPS, which may be acceptable for some users but is below the ideal threshold. Ultra settings at 1440p should be avoided, as the 48 FPS average will result in visible stuttering and a less responsive experience.

At 4K, the data shows that only Low settings are playable, with an average of 59 FPS. Medium settings drop to 42 FPS, which is not recommended for sustained gameplay. High and Ultra settings at 4K are not viable, with averages of 37 and 32 FPS respectively. Users with a 4K display should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience, or accepting the visual compromises of Low settings.

The best experience per the measured rows is achieved at 1080p with High settings. This provides a stable 73 FPS average, which is well within the range for smooth gameplay, while retaining a high level of visual fidelity. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, 1080p Medium at 82 FPS is the recommended choice. The data does not support any setting above High at 1440p, nor any setting above Low at 4K, for a consistently smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Control with this combo provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. The following breakdown details the exact numbers from the benchmark results.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 115, which is the highest recorded value for this combo. Medium settings yield an average of 82 FPS, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 94. High settings produce an average of 73 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to an average of 63 FPS. All 1080p settings are playable, with even the lowest average (63 FPS on Ultra) remaining above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance decreases noticeably. Low settings still provide a solid 87 FPS average, but Medium drops to 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 and a maximum of 71. High settings average 55 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 48 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is playable at Medium and below, but High and Ultra settings will result in sub-60 FPS averages that may be noticeable during fast-paced action sequences.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings are the only option that reaches near 60 FPS, with an average of 59 FPS. Medium settings drop to 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 and a maximum of 48. High settings average 37 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 32 FPS. The 4K results clearly demonstrate that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming, as even the lowest settings barely reach the playable threshold.

The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor, and the CPU provides ample headroom. The FPS breakdown highlights that this combo is best utilized at 1080p, where it can deliver high frame rates across all settings, and at 1440p with Medium settings for a balanced experience. The 4K results serve as a cautionary note for users expecting high-resolution performance from this mid-range pairing.