Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
92
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 51 64 78
1440p QHD 54 84 103 123
1080p Full HD 75 118 146 173

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 78
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 123
2560x1440 Medium 103
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Ultra 54
1920x1080 Low 173
1920x1080 Medium 146
1920x1080 High 118
1920x1080 Ultra 75

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination delivers a surprisingly versatile experience in Downfall, a horror title from 2016. The measured data shows a wide performance spread across settings and resolutions, making preset selection critical for matching your display's refresh rate. This pairing handles 1080p with ease, offers solid 1440p performance, and can even attempt 4K, though with significant compromises. The benchmark results indicate that this is a well-balanced duo for the game's engine, with neither component becoming a universal bottleneck across all tested scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the data points to the High preset as the optimal balance between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1920x1080, High settings produce an average of 118 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay on standard 60Hz monitors and leaves headroom for 120Hz displays. At 2560x1440, High settings still deliver a strong 84.1 FPS average, making this the sweet spot for higher-resolution monitors without sacrificing too much visual quality. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs about 18.8 FPS (from 102.9 to 84.1), but the visual improvement in a horror game's atmospheric lighting and textures is typically worth that trade-off.

The Ultra preset is problematic at every resolution. At 1080p, it drops to 74.5 FPS, which is playable but a significant 43.5 FPS reduction from High. At 1440p, Ultra falls to 53.9 FPS, and at 4K it plummets to 35.1 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay in a title that relies on tension and quick reactions. The data suggests that Low settings are only advisable for competitive play or if you absolutely need maximum frame rates on a high-refresh monitor. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 172.7 FPS, and at 1440p Low, it reaches 123.1 FPS, both of which are excellent for 144Hz panels. However, the visual downgrade in a horror game—where shadows and ambient occlusion are crucial—is severe. For most users, High at 1440p or High at 1080p represents the best experience, with Medium as a fallback if you prefer higher frame rates on a 144Hz monitor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the primary driver of Downfall's performance, and its specifications directly explain the measured results. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, the card has a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for the game's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results suggest that memory capacity and bandwidth become limiting factors at that resolution. The base clock of 1365 MHz and boost clock of 1680 MHz, combined with 1920 shading units, provide the raw compute power needed for the game's rendering. The card's FP32 performance of 6.451 TFLOPS is the key metric for traditional rasterization, which Downfall relies on.

The RTX 2060's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are present, but Downfall's 2016 release date means it likely does not use ray tracing or DLSS, so these features do not impact the measured FPS. The GPU's transistor count of 10,800 million on a 445 mm² die, built on TSMC's 12 nm process, explains its thermal and power characteristics, but the performance data is what matters here. The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position: a Passmark G3D score of 14111 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1242 place it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range card, and the measured FPS in Downfall reflects that positioning. The card's nearest rivals—the AMD Radeon RX 7600S (0.5% faster), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.7% slower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (1.7% slower)—all sit within a tight performance band, confirming that the RTX 2060 is a consistent performer for this era of gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 2060 ranks 1377 out of 1741 combos for Downfall. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible configurations, which is expected given that the CPU and GPU are both older mid-range parts. However, this ranking should be interpreted carefully. The combo rank reflects the absolute performance ceiling, and many of the 364 combos ranked above this one likely use significantly more powerful CPUs or GPUs. The data shows that this combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from the bottom, and its real-world usability depends heavily on the settings and resolution you choose, as detailed in the measured FPS breakdown.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19616 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals like the Intel Core i5-1345U (-0.4%), AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (0.6%), and Intel Core i7-10700F (0.7%) all performing within 1% of each other. This means the CPU is not a weak link in most scenarios. The GPU's average benchmark score of 16074 places it in the 58th percentile, with its nearest rivals also clustered closely. The data indicates that for Downfall, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU handles the game's logic and physics without bottlenecking, given its 6 cores and 12 threads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: The results here are excellent across the board. Low settings yield an average of 172.7 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh monitors. Medium settings provide 146.2 FPS, still very high. High settings drop to 118 FPS, which is smooth for most displays. Ultra settings are the outlier at 74.5 FPS, a substantial drop from High, indicating that the Ultra preset introduces rendering features that heavily tax the GPU.

2560x1440: This resolution shows the combo's strength. Low settings deliver 123.1 FPS, making it possible to use a 144Hz monitor at 1440p. Medium settings produce 102.9 FPS, which is excellent for a 100Hz or 120Hz display. High settings fall to 84.1 FPS, which is still very playable on a 60Hz or 75Hz monitor, and the visual quality improvement over Medium is noticeable. Ultra settings drop to 53.9 FPS, which is marginal for smooth gameplay.

3840x2160: This resolution is a challenge for the combo. High settings produce 50.7 FPS, which is playable on a 60Hz display but not ideal for fast-paced horror sequences. Medium settings yield 63.8 FPS, a better option if you want to try 4K. Low settings hit 78.4 FPS, which is surprisingly playable and shows the game's scalability. Ultra settings are not recommended, as they drop to 35.1 FPS, which is too low for a smooth experience. The data clearly shows that 4K requires either Low or Medium settings for this combo.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Downfall at 144Hz?*

A: Yes, but only at lower resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, Low settings hit 172.7 FPS and Medium settings hit 146.2 FPS, both exceeding 144Hz. At 2560x1440, only Low settings exceed 144Hz with 123.1 FPS, so you would need a 120Hz or lower refresh monitor for a stable experience.

Q: Is the Ultra preset worth using?

A: The data suggests no. At 1080p, Ultra drops to 74.5 FPS from High's 118 FPS, a 43.5 FPS loss. At 1440p, Ultra falls to 53.9 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 35.1 FPS. The visual gains from Ultra are unlikely to justify the significant frame rate reductions.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: 2560x1440 with High settings is the sweet spot, providing 84.1 FPS with good visual quality. If you prefer higher frame rates, 1920x1080 with High settings offers 118 FPS. Both options provide a balanced experience, while 4K is only viable with Low or Medium settings.

Q: How does this combo compare to similar setups?

A: The combo ranks 1377 out of 1741 tested combinations. The CPU is in the 77th percentile, while the GPU is in the 58th percentile. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-1345U and AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, perform within 1% of it, indicating the CPU is not the bottleneck.

*Q: Is 6 GB of VRAM enough for Downfall?*

A: The measured data indicates yes for 1080p and 1440p, where the combo performs well. At 4K, the significant frame rate drops, especially at High and Ultra settings, suggest that the 6 GB VRAM capacity and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth may be insufficient for the game's highest texture quality at that resolution.

Q: Should I use Low settings for competitive play?

A: If frame rate is your top priority, yes. Low settings at 1080p deliver 172.7 FPS, and at 1440p they deliver 123.1 FPS. However, Low settings will reduce visual fidelity, which can impact your ability to spot enemies or environmental details in a horror game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 plays a supporting but crucial role in this combo. With 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen+ architecture on a 12 nm process, it provides ample processing power for Downfall's game logic, AI, and physics. The base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are modest by modern standards, but the benchmark data shows they are sufficient. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and single-core score of 1579 indicate solid performance for a 2018 processor. Its Passmark multithread score of 13160 and single-thread score of 2239 confirm that it handles single-threaded tasks adequately, which is important for older game engines that may not fully utilize many cores.

The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU. In the measured FPS data, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck at 1080p, where the GPU is clearly the limiting factor at Ultra settings. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant, meaning the CPU has ample headroom. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 and its tight clustering with rivals like the Intel Core i5-11600KF (-0.6%) and Intel Core i7-10700F (0.7%) suggest that upgrading the CPU alone would provide minimal gains in Downfall. The data indicates that this processor is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 2060 in this specific game, making it a well-matched pair for a balanced system.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 3900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

VRAM 6 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 1680 MHz MHz
TDP 160 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 78.4
3840x2160 Medium 63.8
3840x2160 High 50.7
3840x2160 Ultra 35.1
2560x1440 Low 123.1
2560x1440 Medium 102.9
2560x1440 High 84.1
2560x1440 Ultra 53.9
1920x1080 Low 172.7
1920x1080 Medium 146.2
1920x1080 High 118.0
1920x1080 Ultra 74.5

Downfall with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RTX 2060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.