AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H as the stronger overall performer for most workloads. With an average benchmark score of 34,485 and a percentile rank of 84 among all CPUs, the Intel chip sits in a much higher performance tier than the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, which holds a percentile rank of 50 and has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel processor also has a clear lead in threaded workloads, as its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,991 and PassMark multithread score of 28,545 demonstrate substantial throughput capacity.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, while lacking direct performance scores in the database, is positioned as a lower-power, embedded-focused part with an 8-core, 16-thread configuration based on Zen 4 architecture. Its 45 W TDP is higher than the Intel chip's 25 W TDP, which suggests it is designed for sustained industrial or embedded workloads rather than raw performance leadership. For applications that require ECC memory support, the AMD part is the only choice, as the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not support ECC memory.

Choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H for general mobile computing, multi-threaded productivity, and single-thread responsiveness. Choose the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS for embedded systems, edge deployments, or any scenario where ECC memory error correction is mandatory. The data shows the Intel processor is the performance winner, while the AMD processor is the reliability-focused alternative with a different architectural foundation.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins decisively in every recorded benchmark category. Its 16-core, 16-thread configuration with Panther Lake architecture delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,991, which is a strong result for mobile processors. The PassMark multithread score of 28,545 reinforces this lead, and the single-thread performance is equally impressive: a PassMark single-thread score of 4,013 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,387. These results indicate the Intel chip excels in both heavily threaded applications and lightly threaded tasks such as web browsing, office work, and software compilation.

The Intel chip also dominates in specialized workloads. Its PassMark data compression score of 280,340 shows very high throughput for archiving and compression tasks, while the floating point math score of 82,415 and integer math score of 62,070 indicate strong computational capability for scientific and financial workloads. The extended instructions score of 24,542 suggests solid performance for SIMD-heavy code, and the random string sorting score of 34,402 reflects efficiency in data organization tasks.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its advantages are structural rather than performance-based. It supports ECC memory, which is critical for error-sensitive embedded and server-like workloads. It also uses a 4 nm TSMC process node with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors, which indicates a dense, modern design. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel chip's 4.60 GHz boost clock, and its base clock of 3.80 GHz is substantially higher than the Intel's 1.90 GHz, which may benefit workloads that rely on sustained clock rates rather than burst performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture on the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 8000 series. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors and a die size of 178 mm². Its cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. The chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses AMD Socket FP8, supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, and offers 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The integrated graphics is Radeon 780M, and the chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes on the CPU.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is built on the Panther Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 3 generation. It uses a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry, though transistor count and die size are not recorded. The cache configuration is notably different: 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3 cache. The chip has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it uses a hybrid design with more physical cores but no hyperthreading. Its base clock is 1.90 GHz and boost clock is 4.60 GHz. It uses Intel BGA 2540 socket, supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration, and offers a higher memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The integrated graphics is Intel Xe3 Graphics, and the chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes on the CPU.

The memory bandwidth difference is significant: the Intel chip's 115.2 GB/s is about 29% higher than the AMD chip's 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the AMD chip does not list. The PCIe generation difference is also notable: Intel moves to Gen 5 while AMD remains on Gen 4, though Intel has fewer lanes (12 versus 20). The AMD chip's ECC memory support is a clear architectural differentiator, as the Intel chip does not support ECC.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads, meaning the Intel chip does not use simultaneous multithreading while the AMD chip does.

Q: Which chip has higher clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has both a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 1.90 GHz) and a higher boost clock (5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz) compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Intel chip ranks at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 34,485. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700HX (0.2% lower score), Intel Core i5-13450HX (0.4% higher score), AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (0.7% higher score), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.8% higher score).

Q: Which chip has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS's 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip also supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5.

Q: What are the manufacturing process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, as the AMD chip has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel chip's performance can be evaluated against its nearest rivals in the database, which provides context for its standing.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,991, which is a strong result for a mobile processor. Its single-core score of 3,387 in the same test shows balanced performance. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 10,076 multicore and 1,422 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results are 2,418 multicore and 341 single-core.

In PassMark tests, the Intel chip shows notable strength in data compression with a score of 280,340, which is roughly 13 times its integer math score of 62,070 and more than 3 times its floating point math score of 82,415. The data encryption score of 21,291 and extended instructions score of 24,542 are both substantial. The find prime numbers score of 299 is comparatively low, which may reflect the hybrid core design's behavior on this specific workload. The physics score of 2,682 and random string sorting score of 34,402 round out the PassMark suite.

The nearest rivals for the Intel chip are all within a narrow performance band. The Intel Core i7-13700HX scores 34,554, which is 0.2% higher than the Core Ultra 5 336H's average of 34,485. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34,333, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34,260, which is 0.7% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34,222, which is 0.8% lower. These deltas show that the Core Ultra 5 336H is tightly clustered with established mid-range desktop and mobile processors, sitting essentially at parity with the i7-13700HX while slightly ahead of the other three rivals.

Because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark scores, a direct numerical comparison is impossible. The data indicates that the Intel chip's 16-core design, higher memory bandwidth, and 3 nm process node give it a structural advantage in most compute-intensive scenarios. The AMD chip's higher clock speeds and ECC support are its recorded strengths, but without benchmark results, its performance level cannot be quantified in the database.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores; Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores.
• Threads: Both have 16 threads, but the AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading while the Intel chip does not.
• Base clock: AMD is 3.80 GHz; Intel is 1.90 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD is 5.10 GHz; Intel is 4.60 GHz.
• TDP: AMD is 45 W; Intel is 25 W.
• Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8; Intel uses Intel BGA 2540.
• Architecture: AMD uses Zen 4; Intel uses Panther Lake.
• Codename: AMD is Hawk Point; Intel is Panther Lake.
• Process node: AMD is 4 nm at TSMC; Intel is 3 nm at Intel foundry.
• Transistors: AMD has 25,000 million; Intel has no recorded value.
• Die size: AMD is 178 mm²; Intel has no recorded value.
• L1 cache: AMD is 64 KB per core; Intel is 192 KB per core.
• L2 cache: AMD is 1 MB per core; Intel is 2.5 MB per core.
• L3 cache: AMD is 16 MB shared; Intel is 18 MB shared.
• Memory support: AMD supports DDR5; Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD is 89.6 GB/s; Intel is 115.2 GB/s.
• ECC memory: AMD supports it; Intel does not.
• PCIe: AMD is Gen 4 with 20 lanes; Intel is Gen 5 with 12 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 780M; Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics.
• Release date: AMD was released on 2024-04-01; Intel was released on 2026-01-04.
• Part number: AMD is unknown; Intel is SA4RD.

Both processors are active production parts, mobile market segment, have no unlocked multiplier, and have no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel chip's newer release date and larger core count, combined with its higher memory bandwidth and smaller process node, indicate a more recent and more capable design for general mobile workloads. The AMD chip's ECC support and higher clock speeds remain its distinguishing features for embedded applications.