AMD Ryzen 5 5600F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H occupy very different positions in the processor landscape, and the recorded data reflects that split. The AMD chip is a desktop part built on the Zen 3 architecture, while the Intel chip is a mobile processor using Panther Lake. Across the head-to-head benchmarks in the database, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins every single test, taking 11 of 11 comparisons. The Ryzen 5 5600F, however, holds a higher average benchmark score of 36945 compared to the Intel chip’s 34485, and it also sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs versus the Intel part’s 84th percentile. This creates an interesting dynamic where the desktop chip has a higher overall standing in the database, but the mobile chip delivers superior performance in every recorded workload category.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the dominant performer in the head-to-head data, winning all 11 recorded benchmark comparisons. The largest margins come in compute-heavy workloads. In floating point math, the Intel chip scores 82415 against the AMD chip’s 34548, a delta of 58.1 percent. Physics simulation shows a similar gap, with the Intel part at 2682 versus 1043 for the AMD part, a 61.1 percent difference. The Intel chip also leads in prime number finding, scoring 299 versus 120, a 59.9 percent advantage. These results indicate that the Intel processor is substantially stronger in raw mathematical and physics-based tasks.

Data compression and encryption also favor the Intel chip, though by smaller margins. The Intel part scores 280340 in data compression versus 232836 for the AMD part, a 16.9 percent lead. In data encryption, the Intel chip scores 21291 against 13839, a 35 percent advantage. Extended instruction workloads show the Intel chip at 24542 versus 16266, a 33.7 percent lead. The Intel chip also wins in random string sorting, scoring 34402 versus 23422, a 31.9 percent difference, and in multithread performance, scoring 28545 versus 19236, a 32.6 percent lead.

The smallest Intel win comes in integer math, where the Intel chip scores 62070 versus 59339 for the AMD chip, a slim 4.4 percent margin. Single-thread performance also favors Intel, with the Core Ultra 5 336H scoring 4013 versus 2872, a 28.4 percent lead. Despite the Intel chip winning every head-to-head benchmark, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F still posts a higher average benchmark score in the database, 36945 versus 34485. That higher average comes from the AMD chip’s overall benchmark profile, which includes a broader set of results beyond the head-to-head list.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F uses Zen 3, codenamed Vermeer, and is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses Panther Lake, codenamed Panther Lake, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. This process difference is significant, as the Intel chip uses a newer and smaller manufacturing node.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has more cores but no hyperthreading, resulting in a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio. The AMD part relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach 12 threads from 6 cores. Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger L1 and L2 per core, but the AMD part has more total L3.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD chip supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part also has integrated graphics, using Intel Xe3 Graphics, while the AMD chip has no integrated graphics. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. PCIe generations also differ, with the AMD chip using Gen 4 with 20 lanes and the Intel chip using Gen 5 with 12 lanes.

The AMD chip is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM4 with an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is a mobile part on Intel BGA 2540 with a locked multiplier. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock but a much lower base clock. Thermal design power also differs, with the AMD chip rated at 65 watts and the Intel chip at 25 watts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F supports DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has Intel Xe3 Graphics, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485.

Q: Which processor wins the head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons in the database.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H differ across nearly every major specification. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 1.90 GHz for the Intel chip, while boost clocks are 4.00 GHz and 4.60 GHz respectively. The AMD chip has a TDP of 65 watts, the Intel chip 25 watts. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM4, the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 2540. The AMD chip is built on Zen 3 with the Vermeer codename, the Intel chip on Panther Lake with the Panther Lake codename.

The process node differs, with the AMD chip at 7 nm from TSMC and the Intel chip at 3 nm from Intel. The AMD chip has 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, while the Intel chip has no recorded transistor or die size data. L1 cache is 64 KB per core for the AMD chip and 192 KB per core for the Intel chip. L2 cache is 512 KB per core for the AMD chip and 2.5 MB per core for the Intel chip. L3 cache is 32 MB shared for the AMD chip and 18 MB shared for the Intel chip. The AMD chip supports DDR4, the Intel chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for the AMD chip and 115.2 GB/s for the Intel chip. ECC memory is supported on the AMD chip but not on the Intel chip.

PCIe configuration differs, with the AMD chip using Gen 4 with 20 lanes and the Intel chip using Gen 5 with 12 lanes. Integrated graphics are absent on the AMD chip and present as Intel Xe3 Graphics on the Intel chip. The AMD chip is a desktop part with an unlocked multiplier, the Intel chip is a mobile part with a locked multiplier. The AMD chip has the part number 100-000001903, the Intel chip has SA4RD. Release dates also differ, with the AMD chip released in 2025 and the Intel chip in 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark, and the margins reveal where the architectural differences matter most. The largest Intel win is in physics, where the Intel chip scores 2682 against the AMD chip’s 1043, a 61.1 percent advantage. Floating point math shows a 58.1 percent lead, with the Intel chip at 82415 and the AMD chip at 34548. Prime number finding is another strong Intel result, with the Intel chip at 299 versus 120, a 59.9 percent difference. These three workloads are heavily compute-bound, and the Intel chip’s 16 cores and 3 nm process likely contribute to the large margins.

Data encryption favors the Intel chip by 35 percent, with a score of 21291 versus 13839. Extended instructions show a 33.7 percent Intel lead, with scores of 24542 and 16266. Multithread performance is 32.6 percent higher on the Intel chip, scoring 28545 versus 19236. Random string sorting gives the Intel chip a 31.9 percent edge, with 34402 versus 23422. Single-thread performance is 28.4 percent higher on the Intel chip, with scores of 4013 and 2872.

The closest contest is integer math, where the Intel chip scores 62070 and the AMD chip scores 59339, a lead of just 4.4 percent. Data compression is the second closest, with the Intel chip at 280340 and the AMD chip at 232836, a 16.9 percent margin. Despite the Intel chip’s sweep of the head-to-head tests, the AMD chip holds a higher average benchmark score in the database at 36945 versus 34485. The AMD chip also has a higher percentile ranking, sitting at the 85th percentile of all CPUs compared to the Intel chip’s 84th percentile. The AMD chip’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with an average score of 36938, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D at 37018, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37093. The Intel chip’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700HX at 34554, the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333, and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260.