AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a full set of measurements. This asymmetry makes direct score-to-score comparisons impossible. However, the Intel part's position within the database can be assessed using its percentile and rival deltas.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,924. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-12700 scores 32,942 (a delta of -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 (a delta of +0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079 (a delta of -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33,089 (a delta of -0.5%). The Core 5 213PTE is effectively at parity with all four, within a half percentage point in either direction.

Looking at the specific workload scores recorded for the Intel chip, the strongest result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21,751 points. Single-core performance in the same test reaches 3,070 points. In Cinebench R20, multi-core scores 9,135 and single-core scores 1,289. The older Cinebench R15 run shows 2,192 multi-core and 309 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part include a multi-thread score of 25,590 and a single-thread score of 3,718. Integer math reaches 93,109, floating-point math reaches 71,722, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 16,146. Data compression scores 261,083, data encryption scores 14,413, and random string sorting scores 30,106. Physics simulation scores 2,199, and finding prime numbers scores 157.

Because the AMD part has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison defaults to the Intel chip's known results standing unopposed. The database shows zero wins for the AMD side and zero wins for the Intel side in the head-to-head field, reflecting the lack of paired measurements rather than an actual performance verdict.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE demonstrates clear strengths in sustained multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,751 places it among higher-tier desktop processors, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 25,590 reinforces that positioning. The R20 multi-core result of 9,135 and R15 multi-core result of 2,192 follow the same pattern. For workloads that scale across all 16 threads, such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific computation, the recorded data shows the Intel chip delivers strong results.

Single-thread performance on the Intel side is also solid, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,718 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,070. This suggests responsive performance in lightly threaded applications such as legacy software, everyday desktop use, and certain simulation tasks. The integer and floating-point math scores of 93,109 and 71,722 respectively indicate balanced general-purpose compute capability.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no workload-specific wins can be assigned to it. Its specification sheet suggests a different market focus: it is a mobile-class processor with an integrated Radeon 780M GPU, whereas the Intel part is a desktop-class chip with UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip's integrated graphics likely offers stronger GPU compute, but no measured scores exist in the database to confirm that. The Intel chip's data compression score of 261,083 and encryption score of 14,413 are notable, but without AMD measurements, a comparative use-case split cannot be quantified.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture on the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 8000 series. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation. The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts match at 8 cores and 16 threads for both. Cache layouts differ notably. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip carries 50% more L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) and twice the L2 per core, which can aid in cache-sensitive workloads.

Clock speeds also diverge. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. While the AMD part starts from a much higher base frequency, the Intel part's boost ceiling is slightly higher. Both have a 45 W TDP.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD part's higher peak memory bandwidth could matter for memory-bound workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, while the AMD part has more lanes at the older generation.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The AMD chip uses Radeon 780M, which is a higher-end integrated GPU. The Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730, a more basic integrated solution. For systems relying on the integrated GPU, this is a significant differentiator.

The AMD chip is a mobile-market processor on AMD Socket FP8, released in April 2024. The Intel chip is a desktop-market processor on Intel Socket 1700, released in March 2026. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD chip's multiplier is locked, and the Intel chip's multiplier is also locked. The Intel part has a known part number (SA4QM), while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS at 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 5 213PTE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, a difference of 8 MB.

Q: Which processor uses a newer PCIe standard?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 only. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE averages 32,924, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-12700, 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, and 0.5% below both the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS | Intel Core 5 213PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Bartlett Lake (Core 5) |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die size | 178 mm² | Not recorded |

| Base clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-04-01 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part number | Unknown | SA4QM |

| Benchmark scores | None recorded | 17 tests recorded |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 32,924 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 83 |

Both processors have 8 cores, 16 threads, 45 W TDP, dual-channel memory buses, ECC support, and locked multipliers. The Intel chip has a newer release date by nearly two years and carries a desktop socket, while the AMD chip targets mobile platforms with a more advanced process node and higher memory bandwidth.