AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 130
Core 5 213PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database currently records no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core 5 213PTE. However, the Intel part carries a full set of measured scores, and the AMD part is listed with an average benchmark score of zero and no individual test entries. This means the comparison must rely on the recorded performance of the Intel Core 5 213PTE and its position relative to other processors in the database.
The Intel Core 5 213PTE posts an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals in the database are tightly grouped: the Intel Core i7-12700 scores 32,942 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33,089 (0.5% higher). The only rival it edges out is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, which scores 32,812, a 0.3% deficit. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Intel Core 5 213PTE sits in a performance band where small margins separate it from several established desktop and mobile parts.
Within its own benchmark suite, the Intel Core 5 213PTE shows strong multi-threaded results. In Cinebench R23, it records 21,751 points in multi-core and 3,070 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 run shows 9,135 multi-core and 1,289 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2,192 multi-core and 309 single-core. PassMark tests reinforce this pattern: multi-thread score is 25,590, single-thread is 3,718, integer math reaches 93,109, and floating-point math hits 71,722. Data compression scores 261,083, and data encryption records 14,413. The extended instructions test returns 16,146, random string sorting 30,106, and the prime number search test 157. Physics simulation scores 2,199.
Since the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded benchmark scores, the data cannot show any direct wins for it. The Intel part, by contrast, delivers a complete performance profile, and its percentile ranking confirms it outperforms roughly 83% of all CPUs in the database. The absence of AMD measurements means the head-to-head section is, by necessity, one-sided: the only available numbers belong to the Intel Core 5 213PTE.
Architecture Differences
The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture on the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It is a mobile part with 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, and a 28 W TDP. Its socket is AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, and is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and a 45 W TDP. Its socket is Intel Socket 1700.
Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel design therefore offers more per-core L2 and a larger total L3 pool, which can benefit workloads with repeated access to moderate-sized data sets.
Memory support also splits the two. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports only DDR5, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with the same 76.8 GB/s bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part thus has a newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.
Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part is listed as mobile, the Intel part as desktop, which aligns with their sockets and TDP ratings. The AMD processor has a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no launch MSRP listed.
Release dates differ by roughly six months. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is dated September 30, 2025, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is dated March 8, 2026. Both are marked as active production parts.
The Verdict
The recorded data gives a clear but asymmetric picture. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is a fully measured processor with an average benchmark score of 32,924 and a percentile rank of 83. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, meaning it competes directly with the Intel Core i7-12700, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, while slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark scores in the database, so no measured performance can be attributed to it.
From the architecture data alone, the Intel part offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, more L2 and L3 cache, and a newer PCIe generation. The AMD part counters with a smaller process node (6 nm versus 10 nm), a lower TDP (28 W versus 45 W), and a higher base clock (2.90 GHz versus 2.10 GHz). For workloads that rely on multi-threaded throughput, the Intel part has a structural advantage: 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, plus a 5.20 GHz boost ceiling.
For workloads that depend on power efficiency and sustained operation at lower thermal envelopes, the AMD part has the advantage on paper, with its 28 W TDP and 6 nm process. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how that efficiency translates into real performance. The Intel part is the only one with measured results, and those results place it in the upper tier of the database.
The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only processor here with verified performance numbers, and those numbers show a strong mid-to-high-end desktop part. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 remains unmeasured, so any performance claim for it would be unsupported by the database.
FAQ
Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 130 have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. The database lists the AMD Ryzen 5 130 with an average benchmark score of zero and no individual test entries.
Q: What is the Intel Core 5 213PTE's percentile rank among all CPUs?
A: It sits at the 83rd percentile, based on an average benchmark score of 32,924.
Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700 scores 32,942, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core 5 213PTE's 32,924.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports only DDR5. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 boosts to 4.55 GHz.
Where Each One Wins
Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every measurable performance category. It has more cores (8 versus 6), more threads (16 versus 12), a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.55 GHz), more L2 cache per core (2 MB versus 512 KB), more shared L3 cache (24 MB versus 16 MB), and a newer PCIe generation (Gen 5 versus Gen 4). Its benchmark scores, where available, are all recorded and place it at the 83rd percentile.
The AMD Ryzen 5 130 wins on parameters that are structural rather than performance-tested. It has a lower TDP (28 W versus 45 W), a higher base clock (2.90 GHz versus 2.10 GHz), a smaller process node (6 nm versus 10 nm), and a smaller die size (210 mm² versus no recorded die size). It also uses the AMD Socket FP7, which targets mobile systems, whereas the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 for desktops.
For use cases that emphasize multi-threaded compute, the Intel part is the only one with data supporting it: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21,751 and PassMark multi-thread at 25,590. For use cases that prioritize low power draw and compact mobile integration, the AMD part has the specification advantage, but the database contains no measurements to confirm real-world performance. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only processor in this comparison with verified benchmark results, and those results define where it wins.