AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS
Core 5 211E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 211E
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS contains no benchmark entries, while the Intel Core 5 211E carries a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. The comparison is therefore one-sided in terms of measurable scores, but the available data still allows for a detailed analysis of where each processor stands.
The Intel Core 5 211E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,389 and a single-core score of 2,878. Its Cinebench R20 results are 8,563 multi-core and 1,208 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2,055 multi-core and 289 single-core. These scores place the Core 5 211E at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 37,829.
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 5 211E provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804, a delta of 0.1 percent relative to the Core 5 211E. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37,762, also a 0.2 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Core 5 211E, and the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37,911, also 0.2 percent higher. These deltas are tiny, indicating that the Core 5 211E sits in a tightly packed performance cluster where a few points separate competitors.
PassMark results for the Intel Core 5 211E show a multi-thread score of 23,833 and a single-thread score of 4,006. Integer math scores 88,117, floating point math scores 66,402, and extended instructions score 21,592. Data compression scores 346,757, while data encryption scores 17,938. Prime number finding scores 43, random string sorting scores 34,308, and physics scores 702.
Because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no head-to-head wins to assign to either processor. The wins counter shows zero for both. The practical takeaway is that the Intel part has verified performance data, while the AMD part does not, so any direct score comparison between the two is impossible from the recorded information.
The Verdict
The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 211E is the only one of the two processors with measured benchmark results. Its 86th percentile ranking and average score of 37,829 place it among competitive desktop-class parts, with nearest rivals all within 0.2 percent of its score. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile rating, and an average benchmark score of zero, meaning the database contains no evidence of its performance under these tests.
For a buyer choosing based strictly on recorded data, the Intel Core 5 211E offers proven multi-core and single-core figures. The AMD part cannot be evaluated from the database, as no scores exist for any Cinebench or PassMark test. The Intel processor also carries a launch MSRP of $221, which is a factual specification rather than a value judgment.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS does have architectural advantages that are documented in the specifications, including a 4 nm process node versus the Intel 10 nm node, a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 2.70 GHz, and a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. These specifications suggest the AMD part may perform competitively, but the database contains no benchmark scores to confirm that.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 211E wins in every category where benchmark data exists, simply because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no entries. In multi-core workloads, the Intel part records 20,389 in Cinebench R23 and 23,833 in PassMark multi-thread. In single-core work, it scores 2,878 in Cinebench R23 and 4,006 in PassMark single-thread. These are the only recorded wins available.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS wins on paper in clock speed, with a 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost against the Intel 2.70 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. It also uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD processor has a smaller die at 178 mm² versus 257 mm², and it has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s.
For use cases involving heavy multi-threaded rendering or encoding, the Intel Core 5 211E has the only verified scores, and they are strong enough to place it near competitors like the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel Core i9-14901E. For workloads that depend on raw clock speed or memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS specifications indicate potential advantages, but no measured confirmation exists in the database.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37,829, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has an average score of zero with no recorded benchmark entries.
Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211E compare to its closest rivals?
A: It is within 0.2 percent of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel Core i9-14901E, and within 0.1 percent of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and 0.2 percent of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435.
Q: What is the core and thread count difference?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: Which processor supports faster memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and supports DDR5, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 76.8 GB/s and supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, and the Intel Core 5 211E uses a 10 nm process from Intel.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 5 211E support ECC memory.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, part of the 8000 series and the Ryzen Embedded generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation, on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a 257 mm² die and no transistor count listed.
Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. Both lack 3D V-Cache, and neither has a listed total L3 figure separate from the shared amount.
Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700.
PCIe support differs: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Production status is Active for both. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
Specification Differences
Clock speeds: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS runs at 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, versus 2.70 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost for the Intel Core 5 211E.
TDP: the AMD part is rated at 45 watts, the Intel part at 65 watts.
Cores and threads: the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads.
Process node: the AMD part uses 4 nm at TSMC, the Intel part uses 10 nm at Intel.
Die size: the AMD part measures 178 mm², the Intel part 257 mm². Transistor count is 25,000 million for AMD and not listed for Intel.
Memory support: the AMD part supports DDR5 only, the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. Both use dual-channel memory buses and both support ECC.
PCIe: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.
Integrated graphics: the AMD part uses Radeon 780M, the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.
Socket and market segment: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8 and is a mobile part, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part.
Release dates: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS was released on 2024-04-01, the Intel Core 5 211E on 2025-01-12. The AMD part has no launch MSRP, the Intel part lists $221. The AMD part has no part number listed, the Intel part has part number SRQERQ65F. Both have production status Active and neither has an unlocked multiplier.