Intel Core 5 211E
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
Integrated GPU
ECC MemoryAt a Glance
IntelIntel Core 5 211E Specifications
Core 5 211E Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Core 5 211E features 10 physical cores and 16 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
5 211E Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Core 5 211E benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core 5 211E by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Core 5 211E Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the 5 211E processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core 5 211E's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Intel Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Core 5 211E is built on Intel's 10 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in 5 211E incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Core 5 211E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 65W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 1700 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Core 5 211E uses the Intel Socket 1700 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 1700 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the 5 211E define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core 5 211E determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Core 5 211E Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Core 5 211E includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the 5 211E provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Core 5 211E is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core 5 211E by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
About Intel Core 5 211E
Intel Core 5 211E is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, built on the 10 nm process with the Bartlett Lake codename. It posts an average benchmark score of 37,829, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, which indicates a strong upper-mid-range performer. The data shows it sits in an extremely tight competitive cluster, trading leads of less than a single percentage point with several AMD and Intel rivals, making its specific workload characteristics more important than its raw aggregate score.
Platform and Compatibility
The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Intel Socket 1700, a platform that has been widely adopted across Intel's desktop lineup. This socket compatibility means the processor can drop into a broad ecosystem of existing motherboards, which is a practical advantage for system builders who may already have a compatible board or want to avoid a platform transition. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility to choose between the two memory generations based on their motherboard and budget constraints. Memory is accessed through a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is sufficient for feeding the 10 cores and 16 threads without creating a noticeable bottleneck in most workloads.
For expansion, the processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This is the current high-bandwidth standard for connecting discrete graphics cards and NVMe storage, so the 211E is ready for modern high-end components. The 16 lanes are dedicated to CPU-attached devices, which is the standard allocation for a single GPU or a pair of storage drives. The processor also includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 730, which provides a basic display output capability without requiring a discrete GPU, a useful fallback for troubleshooting or for systems that do not need heavy graphical performance. ECC memory support is enabled, which is a notable feature for entry-level server or workstation builds where data integrity is critical.
The upgrade path is constrained by the socket and the active production status. Since the 211E uses Socket 1700, it is compatible with the range of motherboards designed for that socket, but the architecture is specific to this generation. The processor is currently marked as Active in production, meaning it is a current product, but the Socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel sockets, so future upgrades would require a motherboard change. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, which means overclocking is limited to adjustments on locked motherboards, but the base clock of 2.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz already provide a wide operating range. The release date is set for January 2025, positioning it as a recent addition to the market.
Power and Thermals
The Intel Core 5 211E carries a TDP of 65 watts, which places it in the mainstream power envelope for desktop processors. This TDP class is notable because it does not require exotic cooling solutions or high-end power delivery systems. A standard tower air cooler or a basic liquid cooler is more than sufficient to handle the thermal output under sustained loads, and the 65-watt rating suggests the processor can maintain its boost clocks without hitting thermal throttling thresholds in a well-ventilated case. For system integrators, this simplifies cooling design and reduces overall system cost, as the motherboard VRM requirements are modest compared to higher-TDP parts.
The 65-watt TDP also has implications for the power supply sizing. A typical 500-watt to 650-watt power supply is adequate for a system built around this processor, even when paired with a discrete GPU, because the CPU is not a power hog. The 10 nm process node contributes to this efficiency, as smaller process nodes generally reduce power leakage and improve thermal density. The die size is 257 mm², which is a relatively large die for a 10 nm part, but the power density remains manageable given the 65-watt envelope. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is high for a 65-watt part, indicating that Intel has tuned the power delivery to allow short bursts of high frequency without exceeding the thermal budget.
The cooling tier implied by the TDP is that of a mainstream desktop processor. It is not a low-power ultra-portable chip that requires passive cooling, nor is it a high-end enthusiast part that demands a 360mm radiator. The data suggests that the 211E operates comfortably with the stock cooler or any aftermarket cooler in the same class. For workload-intensive tasks like video encoding or software compilation that stress all 10 cores, the processor will generate more heat, but the 65-watt rating means that even under full load, the thermal output is well within the capabilities of standard cooling solutions. This makes the 211E a straightforward component to integrate into a build, with no special thermal considerations beyond what is standard for a mid-range desktop.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The benchmark data for the Intel Core 5 211E reveals a distinct split between single-thread and multi-thread performance, with the single-thread scores being relatively stronger compared to its multi-thread results. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 2,878 points in single-core and 20,389 points in multi-core. The ratio between these scores is roughly 7.1x, which is lower than the theoretical 10x scaling from 10 cores, indicating that the processor does not achieve perfect scaling in multi-threaded workloads. This is normal for a modern processor, as memory bandwidth and cache coherence overhead reduce scaling efficiency, but the 20,389 multi-core score is still a strong result that indicates the 10 cores are being utilized effectively.
The single-thread score of 2,878 in Cinebench R23 places the 211E in a competitive position for tasks that rely on high per-core performance. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the primary driver here, and the data shows that the processor can sustain high frequencies on a single core, which is critical for applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that are not optimized for many cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,006 confirms this strength, as it is a score that outpaces many older desktop processors and positions the 211E well for everyday responsiveness.
In contrast, the multi-thread behavior is characterized by the PassMark multithread score of 23,833, which is a strong result but not exceptional for a 10-core part. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,563 and the R15 multi-core score of 2,055 follow the same pattern. The implication for real workloads is that the 211E excels in mixed usage where single-thread performance matters, such as gaming, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck but the CPU still needs to process game logic and draw calls quickly. For highly parallel workloads like video rendering, the 10 cores provide a solid foundation, but the scaling is not linear, so the processor will not match the performance of higher-core-count parts in the same price range. The data suggests that the 211E is a balanced processor that leans slightly toward single-thread performance, making it a versatile choice for a general-purpose desktop.
How It Compares
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 5 211E are four processors from AMD and Intel, and the delta percentages show that the 211E is essentially tied with all of them in average benchmark score. Against the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, the 211E is 0.1% ahead, which is a negligible difference that falls well within run-to-run variance. This means that in aggregate performance, the two processors are indistinguishable, and the choice between them would come down to platform features, pricing, or specific workload optimizations rather than raw speed.
Versus the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, the 211E is 0.2% ahead, again a margin that is effectively a tie. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is a mobile-oriented part, so the comparison highlights that the 211E can match a newer AMD processor in raw compute despite being a desktop part with a different architecture. The benchmark data shows that the 211E holds its own against this rival, but the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 may have advantages in power efficiency or integrated AI features that are not captured in the average score.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a higher-end part, and the 211E is 0.2% behind it, which is again a negligible difference. This is surprising given that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is likely a more expensive processor with a higher core count, but the average benchmark score indicates that the 211E competes at the same level in the tests used to calculate the average. The data suggests that the 211E's high boost clock helps it close the gap in single-thread tests, while the multi-thread tests are close enough to keep the overall average within 0.2%.
Finally, against the Intel Core i9-14901E, the 211E is 0.2% behind. This is a direct Intel-to-Intel comparison, and the i9-14901E is a higher-tier part with presumably more cores, but the average score difference is minimal. The 211E's 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to stay competitive with the i9-14901E in the benchmark suite, which indicates that the 211E offers a strong price-to-performance proposition within the same socket. Overall, the 211E sits in a tightly packed performance band where all five processors are within 0.4% of each other, making the decision between them based on factors other than raw benchmark scores.
Benchmark Performance
Delving into the specific benchmark scores, the Intel Core 5 211E shows a consistent performance profile across different test suites. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2,055 and the single-core score is 289. The single-core score of 289 translates to a ratio of about 7.1x when compared to the multi-core score, which is a typical ratio for a 10-core processor. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 8,563 multi-core and 1,208 single-core, and in Cinebench R23, they are 20,389 multi-core and 2,878 single-core. The progression from R15 to R23 shows that the processor scales well with the increasing workload complexity in newer versions of the benchmark.
The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload types. The data compression score is 346,757, which is a very high score indicating strong performance in archiving and compression tasks that rely heavily on integer math and memory bandwidth. The data encryption score is 17,938, which is respectable but not extraordinary, suggesting that the AES-NI instructions are present but not the fastest available. The extended instructions score is 21,592, which covers SIMD operations like AVX and is a good indicator of performance in scientific and engineering applications. The floating point math score is 66,402, which is solid for tasks like 3D rendering and physics simulations.
The integer math score is 88,117, which is a strong result for general computing tasks and database operations. The find prime numbers score is 43, which is a low score that indicates the processor is not optimized for this specific type of single-threaded integer workload, but this is a niche test. The physics score is 702, which is relevant for gaming physics calculations and is a moderate result. The random string sorting score is 34,308, which tests memory access patterns and is a decent score. The single-thread score of 4,006 is a key metric, as it places the 211E in the upper range for single-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and legacy applications. The average benchmark score of 37,829 places the 211E at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 86% of processors in the database, a strong overall result.
Who Should Consider It
Based on the benchmark data, the Intel Core 5 211E is best suited for users who prioritize single-thread performance in a multi-threaded world. Gamers should consider this processor because the high single-thread score of 4,006 in PassMark and the boost clock of 4.90 GHz are critical for achieving high frame rates in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The 10 cores provide enough headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord while gaming, and the 65-watt TDP means it can be paired with a mid-range GPU without worrying about CPU bottlenecking. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 is a bonus for basic display output but not for gaming, so a discrete GPU is still required for a gaming build.
Content creators who work in applications like video editing or 3D rendering will find the 211E to be a capable but not leading-edge choice. The multi-core scores, such as 20,389 in Cinebench R23, are strong enough for occasional rendering jobs, but the scaling ratio of about 7.1x means that it will not match the performance of higher-core-count processors in sustained heavy workloads. However, for creators who also do a lot of single-threaded tasks like scripting, web development, or photo editing in tools that are not fully parallelized, the 211E offers a good balance. The data compression score of 346,757 is particularly high, making it an excellent choice for users who work with large archives or data pipelines.
Office and productivity users will see the most benefit from the 211E's single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,006 ensures that everyday applications like spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers feel snappy and responsive. The 10 cores handle multitasking smoothly, and the 65-watt TDP allows for quiet, low-power systems that are ideal for office environments. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for users who run critical applications or file servers. The processor is not unlocked for overclocking, so users who want to push performance beyond the stock boost clock will need to look elsewhere, but for the majority of desktop users, the 211E offers a compelling combination of speed and efficiency.
FAQ
Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core 5 211E?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Intel Socket 1700.
Q: Does the Intel Core 5 211E support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?
A: Yes, the processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.
Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core 5 211E and what cooling does it require?
A: The TDP is 65 watts, which means a standard air cooler or basic liquid cooler is sufficient for thermal management.
Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211E compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which is a negligible difference.
Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core 5 211E?
A: The boost clock speed is 4.90 GHz.
Q: Does the Intel Core 5 211E have integrated graphics?
A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 730 for basic display output.
Q: Is the Intel Core 5 211E unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the Intel Core 5 211E are below.
Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core 5 211E performs in parallel rendering workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performerscinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Core 5 211E handles tasks that can't be parallelized.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core 5 211E. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core 5 211E. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core 5 211E after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core 5 211E maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_data_compressionSource
Data compression measures how fast Intel Core 5 211E can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_data_encryptionSource
Data encryption tests how fast Intel Core 5 211E can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_extended_instructionsSource
Extended instructions tests Intel Core 5 211E performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_find_prime_numbersSource
Find prime numbers tests Intel Core 5 211E ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_floating_point_mathSource
Floating point math measures how Intel Core 5 211E handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_integer_mathSource
Integer math tests how fast Intel Core 5 211E processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_multithreadSource
PassMark multi-thread tests Intel Core 5 211E across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_physicsSource
Physics tests how Intel Core 5 211E handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_random_string_sortingSource
Random string sorting measures how fast Intel Core 5 211E can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_single_threadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core 5 211E across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
passmark_singlethreadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core 5 211E across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
The AMD Equivalent of Core 5 211E
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Core 5 211E Comparisons
See how the Core 5 211E stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs