AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 contains no benchmark scores, so the comparison relies entirely on the Intel Core i7-14700T results and the rival deltas. The Intel part achieves an average benchmark score of 41,914, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals confirm the competitive positioning: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41,963, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Intel part trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779, a delta of 0.3%, so the i7-14700T leads that rival by a narrow 0.3%. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42,055, a delta of -0.3%, indicating the Intel part is 0.3% behind. The Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41,650, a delta of 0.6%, the largest advantage in this group.

The i7-14700T delivers 25,980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,667 in single-core. The R20 results are 10,911 multi-core and 1,540 single-core. The R15 results are 2,618 multi-core and 369 single-core. PassMark results show 30,571 in multithread, 3,905 in single-thread, 113,854 in integer math, 79,042 in floating point math, 354,216 in data compression, 21,277 in data encryption, 20,052 in extended instructions, 145 in find prime numbers, 1,946 in physics, and 38,546 in random string sorting. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no entries in the benchmark database, so no direct score can be compared.

Because the AMD part has no recorded measurements, the head-to-head is one-sided. The Intel i7-14700T shows a percentile rank of 88, while the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero. The delta values against rivals suggest the Intel CPU is tightly clustered with four other processors, all within a 0.9 percentage point spread. The largest margin is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE, and the smallest is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T has measurable wins across every benchmark category in the database. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 25,980 and single-core score of 3,667 indicate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The R20 multi-core result of 10,911 and single-core result of 1,540 follow the same pattern. The R15 results of 2,618 multi-core and 369 single-core reinforce this.

The PassMark suite shows where the Intel part performs best. Integer math scores 113,854, which is higher than floating point math at 79,042, suggesting the CPU handles integer-heavy tasks more efficiently. Data compression scores 354,216, the highest single metric in the entire recorded set, indicating a particular strength in compression workloads. Data encryption scores 21,277, extended instructions score 20,052, and random string sorting scores 38,546. Physics scores 1,946, and find prime numbers scores 145, the lowest metric.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark scores in the database, so it cannot be credited with any wins. The architecture suggests potential differences, but the absence of data prevents any quantitative claim. The Intel part is the only one with recorded performance, so it holds every measurable advantage.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700T compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel part scores 41,914 on average. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41,963), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41,779), 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42,055), and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE (41,650).

Q: What is the strongest benchmark result for the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The highest recorded score is 354,216 in PassMark data compression. The next highest is 113,854 in integer math, followed by 79,042 in floating point math.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array is empty, the average score is zero, and the percentile rank is 50. The Intel Core i7-14700T has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results with an average score of 41,914 and a percentile rank of 88.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 3,905, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3,667. The R20 single-core score is 1,540, and the R15 single-core score is 369.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700T perform in Cinebench R23?

A: It scores 25,980 in multi-core and 3,667 in single-core. The multi-core result is more than seven times the single-core result, which reflects the benefit of its 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495?

A: The AMD part has a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s with quad-channel LPDDR5X support. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth value.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core i7-14700T differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.10 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 1.30 GHz. Both have a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The AMD TDP is 55 watts, and the Intel TDP is 35 watts. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP11, and the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700.

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD L2 is 1 MB per core, and the Intel L2 is 2 MB per core. The AMD L3 is 64 MB, and the Intel L3 is 33 MB shared. The AMD die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², and the Intel die size is 257 mm². The AMD process node is 4 nm at TSMC, and the Intel process node is 10 nm at Intel.

Memory support differs. The AMD part uses LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no recorded bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe generations differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part has a Radeon 8065S, and the Intel part has UHD Graphics 770.

Market segments differ. The AMD part is mobile, and the Intel part is desktop. Release dates differ. The AMD part released on 2026-05-19, and the Intel part released on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Both have locked multipliers. The part numbers are 100-000002124 for AMD and SRN41 for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename with a generation listed as Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5). The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R and the generation Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The AMD part has no architecture field listed, but the codename and generation specify the Zen 5 design.

The core counts reflect different design philosophies. The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads, all based on Zen 5. The Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads, which indicates a hybrid layout with performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake. The thread count difference is notable: the AMD part has 32 threads from 16 cores, while the Intel part has 28 threads from 20 cores, meaning not every Intel core contributes a second thread.

Cache architecture differs. The AMD L3 is 64 MB, double the 33 MB shared L3 of the Intel part. The Intel L2 is 2 MB per core, double the 1 MB per core of the AMD part. The AMD L1 is 80 KB per core, matching the Intel L1. The larger AMD L3 suggests a design optimized for data reuse across many threads, while the larger Intel L2 per core suggests efficiency for individual core workloads.

Process technology differs. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm node at TSMC, while the Intel part is built on a 10 nm node at Intel. The die sizes reflect this: the AMD die is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², and the Intel die is 257 mm². The smaller AMD process node allows for a smaller die area.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The AMD part uses quad-channel LPDDR5X with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 with no recorded bandwidth. The AMD memory bandwidth figure is more than double what a dual-channel DDR5 configuration would typically provide, though no Intel bandwidth number exists in the database to confirm the exact ratio. PCIe support also differs: the AMD part provides Gen 4 lanes, while the Intel part provides Gen 5 lanes, both with 16 lanes available to the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes a Radeon 8065S, a mobile-class GPU. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770, a desktop-class iGPU. No benchmark scores exist for either GPU in the database. The AMD part is classified as mobile, and the Intel part is classified as desktop, which aligns with their sockets and memory types. The AMD part uses soldered LPDDR5X, and the Intel part supports socketed DDR4 or DDR5 modules, though the database does not specify the module type directly.